Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 - Process Validation 89-2-16
3 - Process Validation 89-2-16
:
Part 3: Process validation
Amir Mehdizadeh, Ph.D.
VMP :
CV :
PV :
EQ :
AMV :
:
:
HVAC
:
:
-1
Principle
.
Scope -2
How to write Protocol for
PV General -3
process validation in non-
sterile products 4. Prospective validation
5. Concurrent validation
6. Retrospective validation
How to write Protocol for
Revalidation -7
sterile products
8. Change control
GMP 4 )GMP
.(
Validation is an essential part of good manufacturing practices
(GMP).
.
It is, therefore, an element of the quality assurance programme
associated with a particular product or process.
:
Quality, safety and efficacy must be designed and built into the product.
.
Quality cannot be inspected or tested into the product.
.
Each critical step of the manufacturing process must be validated.
: 1975 1980
.
Sterility Test
.
Extension
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 7
Dr. Mehdizadeh
FDA
FDA
) (
.
Other steps in the process must be under control to maximize the
probability that the finished product consistently and predictably meets all
quality and design specifications.
.
Validation of processes and systems is fundamental to achieving these
goals.
SOP
Standard operating procedures (SOPs)
Specifications
VMP
Validation master plan (VMP)
Qualification protocols and reports
Validation protocols and reports.
The implementation of validation work requires considerable
resources such as:
: -1
.
Time: generally validation work is subject to rigorous time schedules.
: -2
.
Financial: validation often requires the time of specialized personnel
and expensive technology.
: -3
.
Human resources validation requires the collaboration of experts from
various disciplines
: :
(e.g. a multidisciplinary team, comprising QA, QC, R&D, engineering,
manufacturing and other disciplines, depending on the product and
process to be validated).
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 13
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Validation Master Plan
Collaboration of experts
Budget
GMP
Meticulous and careful planning
Validation
Representatives
Validation Manager
Quality Assurance Manager
Member from production
)Members from Engineering (Utilities
Member from Maintenance
HVAC
)(
.
All validation activities should be planned according to a pre-written ,
pre-approved and pre-authorized schedule.
. VMP
The key elements of a validation program should be clearly defined
and documented in a VMP or equivalent documents.
.VMP
VMP should be a summary document which is brief, concise and
clear.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 17
Dr. Mehdizadeh
VMP
VMP & Process Validation
: VMP
The VMP should contain data on at least the following:
1) validation policy;
2) organizational structure of validation activities;
3) summary of facilities, systems, equipment and processes to
be validated;
4) documentation format: the format to be used for protocols &
reports;
5) planning and scheduling;
6) change control;
7) reference to existing documents.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 18
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-1
.
Process validation provides documented evidence that a process is
capable of reliably and repeatedly rendering a product of the
required quality.
.
The principles of planning, organizing and performing process
validation are similar to those for qualification.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 19
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
)(
.
Process Validation is the means of ensuring, and providing
documentary evidence that processes(within their specified
design parameters) are capable of repeatedly and reliably
producing a finished product of the required quality.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 20
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-1
.
The requirements and principles outlined in these recommendations are
applicable to the manufacture and packaging of non-sterile
pharmaceutical dosage forms.
.) (
They cover the initial validation of new processes, subsequent validation
of modified processes and Re-validation.
.
It should be done in accordance with process validation
protocols;
.
data should be collected and reviewed against predetermined
acceptance criteria, and reflected in process validation reports.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 22
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Setting Limits
Validation limits
2-1
Suspensions Syrups
Ointments
Tablets
2-2
)
.(
2.2 Normally process validation should cover at least the critical
steps and parameters (e.g. those that may have an impact on the
quality of the product) in the process of manufacturing a
product.
3-1
VMP
3-2
. qualification
.OQ IQ
3.2 Process validation should normally begin only once qualification of support
systems and equipment is completed.
.
In some cases process validation may be conducted concurrently with
performance qualification, PQ.
Revalidation
Installation Qualification
Operational Qualification
Monitoring
Maintenance Performance Qualification
Change Control
HV AC
Water Treat ment System
Validation Report
29
Process validation
General -3
3-3
)
.(prospective validation
3.3 Process validation should normally be completed prior to the
manufacture of finished product that is intended for sale
(prospective validation).
( )
Process validation during routine production may also be
acceptable (concurrent validation).
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 30
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-4
Prospective validation
4-1 )
(
.
4.1 Critical factors or parameters that may affect the quality of the
finished product should be identified during product development.
P.2.3.2
.
3.2.P.2
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 32
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation & MAA
To achieve this, the production process should be broken
down into individual steps,
.
and each step should be evaluated (e.g. on the basis of
experience or theoretical considerations).
Feedback
procedure
Risk
Sub-Sub- Sub- analysis
process process
Start
Start
.Etc
End
End
End 42
December 14, 2017
Process validation
-4 Prospective validation
4-2
worst-case challenge .
4.2 The criticality of these factors should be determined through
a worst-case challenge where possible.
QRM
Desired
State
)
(
To move from fire fighting to management of risk
ICH Q9
QRM
QRM
Where QRM can add value
Q10 Q8 Q9
Q8, Pharmaceutical Development
Q9, QRM, Quality Risk Management, QRM
Q10, Pharmaceutical Quality Systems
risk-based
concepts and
principles
Q8
Q9 Q10
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 47
Dr. Mehdizadeh
...
The new paradigm
Pharmaceutical Development (Q8)
Changed
Past: Data transfer / Variable output
Paradigm Present: Knowledge transfer / Science
based / Consistent output
(Q10)
Q8
Q9
Process
Understanding Process Process
Understanding Understanding
CMC CMC
regulatory
regulatory
Oversight CMC CMC
regulatory
(Submission)
oversight regulatory
Oversight
(Submission)
oversight CMC
regulatory
oversight
cGMPcGMP
regulatory
regulatory
oversight Q8 cGMPcGMP
regulatory
regulatory
oversight Q10 cGMP
regulatory
(Inspection)
oversight
& (Inspections)
oversight
& oversight
Companys
Quality system
Q9 Companys Q9 Companys
Quality system
Quality system
Post
Approval
approval
Change Continuous
PAC to
PAC to Improvement
change
(PAC)
Continuous
Continuous
Risk
Ris Improvement Risk
Improvement
(perceived
(P/R)& real) Risk
k
December 14, 2017 49
Risk from Manufacturing site How Q9 interacts with Q8 and Q10
Opportunities to impact
risk using quality risk
Design management Q9
Process
Materials Manufacturing
Facilities
Distribution
Patient
Q8 Q10
FDA 21 GMP
FDAs 21st Century GMP Initiative
: FDA
- 1
Q10
Q9 QRM
1- FDA seeks to integrate quality systems and risk management
approaches into the existing programs and encourages adoption of
modern and innovative manufacturing technology.
-2
FDA
GMP
2- intended to enhance the integration of pre-approval review
and cGMP programs and achieve more consistent application
across agency organization components.
- 3
QRM
3- use existing and emerging science and analysis to ensure that
limited resources are best targeted to address important quality issues,
especially those associated with predictable or identifiable health risks.
:
desired state
current state
FDA
ICH Q9 Impact
Medication or Device
Known Side Effects Product Defects
Error
Avoidable Unavoidable
ICH Q9
Efficacy Quality
Safety Preventable
Adverse
Events
Unexpected Injury or
Consequences Death
Public Health
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 57
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Need to be determined
Need to be monitored during validation
.
May affect the quality of the product
Method to assess and characterize the critical parameters in
the functionality of an equipment or process
.
The evaluation of the risk to quality should ultimately link back
to the protection of the patient
Risk
Probability Harm
severity
Combination of the probability of the occurrence of the harm and the
severity of that harm
Harm
Harm
ICH Q9 Quality Risk Management
QRM
:
Medical devices, ISO 14971
Food, HACCP
lagged
Implementation is patchy
QRM
It is often not fully integrated with rest of the Quality System
.
making do with insufficient time, money, or people,
.
providing an excuse not to do the right things,
deciding what to do based on what might be observed during an
inspection.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 63
Dr. Mehdizadeh
:Risk Management is NOT about
Risk Management does NOT provide an excuse to be out of
compliance with applicable regulations.
knowing our manufacturing processes (and business),
understanding whats truly important,
not spending time on a low risk activity, process, event, or system
.
Because It Just Doesnt Matter!
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 65
Dr. Mehdizadeh
:Risk Management IS about
.
focusing our money, time, energy, and people on the things that
are really important; i.e.,
focusing our efforts and resources on the things that provide
quality assurance to our customers (patients).
; demonstrate that we understand what is important about our business
; have a documented, approved rationale for our decisions
.
be proud to share these with regulatory agencies because they demonstrate
our knowledge and logical thought processes.
We have to do our Risk management properly.
Poor Risk Management will not impress regulators.
At best, they will think we do not know whats really important.
If we dont know whats trivial, how can we know whats
important?
.
If everything is critical, nothing is critical.
A rational approach has to begin with the question
.
What is the impact on the patient?
: 21
Guidelines on
Quality
Expert Working
Groups (EWG) Chemical and
pharmaceutical QA
Safety
Efficacy
Risk Identification
Risk
Assessment
Post Production
Information
Risk Assessment
Risk Identification
Risk Analysis
Risk Evaluation
Risk Control
Risk Reduction
Risk Acceptance
Risk Review
Review Events
RPN
Refers to
Refers to
past today future time
Dimensions of a risk based approach
.
Parameters
for
evaluating risks
hi
gh
probability
m
ed
iu
m
ty
ili
ab
lo
w
ct
te
de
ri s
k severity
78
Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effects & Criticality Analysis (FMECA)
SxO Criticality
10 10
Occurrence Probability
Severity of Effect
9 9 1
8 8 2
7 7 3
6 6 SOD
S O 4 SxOxD
5 5 or Risk
5
4 4 Number
6
3 3 *Detection
7
2 2 8
1 1 9 Higher detection ability*
10 .lowers risk score
RT
A
CH
LE
P
M
SA
80
Risk Assessment Classification
Frequency
Severity Rarely Occasional Frequent
High
Injury, recall Moderate Major Critical
Medium
Complaint Minor Moderate Major
Low
Cosmetic defects No Risk Minor Moderate
High
Risk
Mediu
m Risk
Low
Risk
Hospitalization LowA B
Medium High Risk
Medium High High
1. Introduction
2. Scope
3. Principles of Quality Risk Management (QRM)
4. General Quality Risk Management Process
5. Risk Management Tools
6. Integration of QRM process into industry & regulatory operations
7. Glossary
8. References
Annex I: Potential opportunities for conducting QRM
This guideline provides a framework that may be applied to all
aspects of pharmaceutical quality, including:
development
manufacturing
distribution
Research
Preclinical
Phase
Clinical
Phases
Launch
Manufacturing
& Distribution
GLP Safety
GCP Efficacy
GMP Quality
GDP ICH Q9
88
-3
Principles of Quality Risk Management .3
Two primary principles:
-1
1. The evaluation of the quality risk should ultimately link back to the
potential harm to the patient.
QRM - 2
.
2. The level of effort, formality and documentation of the QRM
process should be commensurate with the level of risk.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 89
Dr. Mehdizadeh
:
Concept: Link Back to Patient Risk
Opportunities to impact
risk using quality risk
management
Design
Process
Materials Manufacturing
Facilities
Distribution
Patient
/
Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effects & Criticality Analysis (FMECA)
Fault tree analysis (FTA)
Hazard Analysis of Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Hazard Operability Analysis (HAZOP)
Risk Ranking and Filtering
Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA)
Supporting statistical tools
HACCP
.
HACCP is a systematic, proactive, and preventive tool for assuring
product quality, reliability, and safety.
HACCP
.
It is a structured approach that applies technical and scientific principles
to analyze, evaluate, prevent, and control the risk or adverse
consequence(s) of hazard(s) due to the design, development, production,
and use of products.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 93
Dr. Mehdizadeh
HACCP 7
-1
(1) conduct a hazard analysis and identify preventive measures
for each step of the process;
-2
(2) determine the critical control points;
-3
(3) establish critical limits;
- 4
(4) establish a system to monitor the critical control points;
- 5
).
(
(5) establish the corrective action to be taken when monitoring
indicates that the critical control points are not in a state of control;
(6) establish system to verify that the HACCP system is working
effectively; (Inspection, supervision, training, validation)
(7) establish a record-keeping system. (Documentation)
Gain experience
:Analyse root cause ?Failure) Risk of(
Continuous Manufacture
improvement
Quality Risk
Management
Improve it (QRM) Do, what you say
Update Approval
information
QRM
Companies can choose whether to use formal quality risk
management
.
If used it should enable regulators to adopt a more flexible
approach to their oversight of a site
.
It will be acceptable to continue to use informal approaches to
managing risk
.
Quality risk management is likely to become best practice
over time
QRM
Significant risk management knowledge gap
Both in industry and regulatory authorities
ICH
ICH EWG plan to produce training guidance
MOH
. QRM
Industry and regulatory authorities will need to initiate programs to
Educate broadly on quality risk management
QRM
Train a cadre of experts who can facilitate implementation of
the risk management process
MOH QRM
.
Quality Risk Management provides a useful process that
enables both industry and regulators to focus on what is
important for patients.
QRM
.
Integration of Quality Risk Management into existing systems and
regulatory process will take time.
)
(
Fill volume
Turntable speed
Dwell time
Tablet compression parameters
Mass
Hardness
Moisture
Friability
Disintegration
Dissolution
Thickness
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 105
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Temperature, humidity
Variations in electrical supply
Vibration
Environmental contaminants
Light
Human factors
Variability of materials
Wear and tear of
equipment
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 107
Dr. Mehdizadeh
) ( Chopper
Impeller
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 108
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Determining critical control point
XV Sieve 3/
sieve with sieve type 1
5 I Q/OQ/PQ
XVI Blend Cleaning Critical Cleaning, and Blend
3/5 validation control uniformity required to be
mixer (speed 1, 1 minute)
granulate point established during validation
XVI Blend 2 mixer (speed 1, 30
with 3/5 seconds)
granulate
Risk
Low
No
Impact Low High
. :
SOP
facilities )
(
sample size
attributes to be monitored
.
.
failure investigation
root cause analysis
corrective action .
Change Variation
rationale
documented.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 115
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-4 Prospective validation
same size
full-scale production.
assumptions .
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 116
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
Prospective validation -4
Extensive testing
various stages
.
:
Extensive tests: viscosity, rheology, particle size distribution,
compresibility, flowability, angle of repose, contact angle,
volume of settlement
Homogeneity in blending the key to quality!
Sampling strategy
Sample sites, label, container
Storage of sample
Sample thief
In situ analysis
Methods of analysis
Statistical analysis
inter-batch
intra-batch
within-sample
: /
.
) (
.
SOP
.
Actions
OOS .
GMP
marketing authorization .
authorized person
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 129
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-5 Concurrent validation
routine production
.
authorized personnel .
.
.
validation
report .
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 130
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-6 Retrospective validation
Retrospective validation
historical data
.
exceptional preferred
cases .
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 131
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-6 Retrospective validation
indication
immediate future .
standard processes using conventional equipment
under control.
:
SOP
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 133
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Process validation
-8 Change control
.
:
) (
)
(
)
(
Change control
Prospective validation
SUMMARY
Concurrent validation
Revalidation
Retrospective validation
Change control
Group Session
critical steps
.
Process Validation
Sterile Pharmaceutical Products
Objectives
GMP
To review basic GMP requirements in the manufacture of sterile
pharmaceutical products
To review air classifications for activities related to the
manufacture of sterile products
To review the different types of sterilization methods
To review quality assurance aspects in the manufacture and
control of sterile products
GMP
Additional rather than replacement
:
The emphasis of all the extra requirements for sterile production is
to minimizing risks of contamination
microbiological
particulate matter
Pyrogen
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 143
Dr. Mehdizadeh
GMP
GMP Requirements for Sterile Products
.
This is because sterile products are administered to
particularly sensitive parts of the body, whether intravenously
or intramuscularly as an injection, as an eye ointment or as a
wound dressing.
Production in clean areas, Appropriate standard of cleanliness,
.
Filtered air supplied
.
Airlocks for entry
Personnel and/or equipment
Materials
:
Separate areas for operations
- 1
1- component preparation (containers and closures)
-2
2- product preparation,
-3
3- Filtration and filling,
-4
4- Thermal sterilization, etc.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 146
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Premises, Sterile Production
Design
Avoid unnecessary entry of supervisors and control personnel.
.
Operations observed from outside
:
Smooth, impervious, unbroken
Minimize shedding and accumulation of particles, MO
Permit cleaning and disinfection
No un-cleanable recesses, ledges, shelves, cupboards,
equipment
Sliding doors undesirable
False ceilings sealed
.
Proper installation of pipes and ducts, no recesses, no
unsealed openings
B A
.
Sinks & drains avoided, (excluded in Grade A and B areas)
:
Where installed, design, location, maintenance
.Trap
Effective cleanable traps
.Air break
Air breaks preventing backflow
Changing rooms
Designed as airlocks
Effective flushing with filtered air
Separate rooms for entry and exit desirable
Hand washing facilities
Interlocking system for doors
Visual and/or audible warning system
Use filtered air supply to maintain pressure cascade
15 10
Pressure differential approximately 10 to 15 Pascales
Zone of greatest risk immediate environment
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 152
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Premises, Sterile Production
:
Pathogenic, highly toxic, radioactive materials
Pressure cascade may be different
Decontamination procedures air, equipment, garments
Qualification including airflow patterns
No risk to the product
Warning system to indicate failure in air supply
Pressure indicators results regularly recorded
Restricted access e.g. use of barriers
Equipment
Conveyer belts
Effective sterilization of equipment
Maintenance and repairs from outside the clean area
If taken apart, re-sterilized before use
Use clean instruments and tools
Planned maintenance, validation and monitoring
Equipment, air filtration systems, sterilizers, water
treatment systems
WFI
Water treatment plants and distribution system
Design, construction, maintenance
Operation and design capacity
Testing programme
Water for Injection (WFI)
Produced, stored, distributed prevention of growth of
microorganisms
Constant circulation at temperature above 70, or not
more than 4 degrees Celsius
Environmental Monitoring - I
Microbiological
Air samples
Surface swabs
Personnel swabs
Environmental Monitoring - II
Physical
Particulate matter
Differential pressures
Air changes, airflow patterns
Environmental Monitoring - II
Clean-up time/recovery
Filter integrity
Temperature and relative humidity
Airflow velocity
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 158
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Sanitation
Frequent, thorough cleaning of areas necessary
Written programme
Regular monitoring to detect resistant strains of MO .
Chemical disinfection
Monitoring of disinfectants and detergents
Dilutions
Clean containers, stored for defined periods of time
Sterilized before use, when used in Grade A or B areas
Grade D
hair, beard, moustache covered
Protective clothing and shoes
Grade C
Hair, beard, moustache covered
Single or 2-piece suit (covering wrists, high neck), shoes
no fibres to be shed
Grade A and B
Headgear, beard and moustache covered, masks, gloves
No shedding of fibres, and retain particles shed by operators
. C B
Outdoor clothing not in change rooms leading to grade B and C
rooms
Change at every working session, or once a day (if supportive data)
Change gloves and masks at every working session
Disinfect gloves during operations
Washing of garments separate laundry facility
No damage, and according to validated procedures
Terminally sterilized
prepared, filled and sterilized
Aseptic preparation
some or all stages
HEPA-filtered air
Processing
Minimise contamination all stages including before
sterilization and during processing
No unsuitable materials, e.g. live microbiological organisms
Minimize activities
staff movement controlled and methodical
avoid shedding of particles
Temperature and humidity comfortable
Containers and materials in the area
Processing
Water sources, water treatment systems and treated water
Monitored regularly
Chemicals
Biological contamination
Endotoxin
Water specification
Records of results and action taken
Processing
Components, bulk product containers and equipment
fibre generation
no recontamination after final cleaning
stage properly identified
sterilized when used in aseptic areas
Used in clean areas, passed through double-ended sterilizers or
use triple wrapping
Gas used to purge solution or blanket a product passed
through a sterilizing filter
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 176
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Processing
Sterile Production
Bioburden monitored
Products: Before sterilization
Working limits established
Solutions to be filtered before filling (especially LVP)
Pressure release outlets hydrophobic microbiological
air filters
Starting materials microbiological contamination should be
minimal
Monitored as per specification
Methods of sterilization
Moist or dry heat
Irradiation (ionizing radiation)
Sterilizing gaseous agents (e.g. ethylene oxide)
Filtration with subsequent aseptic filling
Whenever possible: Terminal sterilization by heat in their final
container - method of choice
Sterilization
Validation
All sterilization processes
Special attention when non-pharmacopoeia methods are used
Non-aqueous or oily solutions
Before the method is adopted its suitability and efficacy
demonstrated with desired conditions:
All parts of the load
Each type of load
Physical measurements and biological indicators (where
appropriate)
Verified at least annually and after change
Records maintained
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 180
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Sterilization
Sterilization
For effective sterilization:
Whole of the material subjected to the treatment
Biological indicators:
Additional method of monitoring
Storage and use, quality checked through positive control
Risk of contamination
Sterilization
Differentiation between sterilized and not-yet-sterilized
products
Each basket/tray or other carrier, properly labelled
Name of material
Batch number
Sterilization status
Use of autoclave tape
Sterilization records for each run approved as part of the
batch release procedure
Sterilization by heat
Sterilization by moist heat
Sterilization by dry heat
Sterilization by radiation
Sterilization by gases and fumigants
Sterilization by heat
Recording of each cycle, e.g. time and temperature chart
Temperature: validated coolest part
Check from second independent probe
Additional chemical or biological indicators
Heating phase: Sufficient time for the whole load
Determined for each load
Cooling phase: After sterilization cycle
Precautions to prevent contamination
Sterilized cooling fluid/gas
Sterilization by radiation
Suitable for heat-sensitive materials and products
confirm suitability of method for material
ultraviolet irradiation not acceptable
Contracting service ensure validation status, responsibilities
Measurement of dose during procedure
Dosimeters independent of dose rate
quantitative measurement
number, location and calibration time-limit
Biological indicators only as additional control
Radiation sensitive colour discs
Aseptic processing
Objective is to maintain the sterility of a product, assembled
from sterile components
Operating conditions so as to prevent microbial contamination
What do you think are the aspects that require careful
attention?
Validation to include
Time taken to filter a known volume
Pressure difference to be used across the filter
Significant differences to be noted and investigated, recorded
in batch records
Integrity of gas and air vent filters checked after use, other
filters at appropriate intervals
Same filter not used for more than one working day, unless
validated
No filter interaction with product, e.g.
removal of ingredients
releasing substances into product
Not possible to define a perfect sterility assurance level for aseptic
processing
( )
Process is validated by simulating the manufacturing process using
microbiological growth medium (media fill)
Process simulation includes formulation (compounding),
filtration and filling with suitable media using the same
processes involved in manufacture of the product
.
modifications must be made for different dosage forms e.g.
lyophilized products, ointments, sterile bulks, eye drops filled
into semi-transparent/opaque containers, biological products
Media fill program should include worst case activities
.
Factors associated with longest permitted run (e.g. operator fatigue)
.
Representative number, type, and complexity of normal interventions,
non-routine interventions and events (e.g. maintenance, stoppages,
etc)
Worst case activities (cont)
Number of personnel and their activities, shift changes, breaks,
gown changes
.
Representative number of aseptic additions (e.g. charging
containers, closures, sterile ingredients) or transfers
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 208
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Validation of Aseptic Processing
Aseptic equipment connections/disconnections
Aseptic sample collections
Line speed and configuration
.
Written batch record documenting conditions and activities
.
Should not be used to justify risky practices
Duration
Depends on type of operation
BFS, Isolator processes - sufficient time to include manipulations
and interventions
For conventional operations should include the total filling time Size
5000 - 10000 generally acceptable or batch size if <5000
For manually intensive processes larger numbers should be filled
Lower numbers can be filled for isolators
Environmental conditions
Representative of actual production conditions (no. of personnel,
activity levels etc)
HVAC
no special precautions (not including adjustment of HVAC)
if nitrogen used for overlaying/purging
Media
.
Anaerobic media should be considered under certain
circumstances
.
Should be tested for growth promoting properties (including
factory isolates)
Incubation
35-30 20-25
If two temperatures are used, lower temperature first
Inspection by qualified personnel.
.
All integral units should be incubated.
.
Should be justification for any units not incubated.
.
Units removed (and not incubated) should be consistent with
routine practices (although incubation would give information
regarding risk of intervention)
Batch reconciliation
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 216
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Validation of Aseptic Processing
Interpretation of Results
. 5000
When filling fewer than 5000 units:
.
no contaminated units should be detected
1
.
One (1) contaminated unit is considered cause for revalidation,
following an investigation
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 217
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Validation of Aseptic Processing
10000 5000
When filling from 5000-10000 units
One (1) contaminated unit should result in an investigation, including
consideration of a repeat media fill
Two (2) contaminated units are considered cause for revalidation,
following investigation
10,000
When filling more than 10000 units
.
One (1) contaminated unit should result in an investigation
.
Two (2) contaminated units are considered cause for revalidation,
following investigation
Interpretation of Results
QC
) .
.
Media fills should be observed by QC and contaminated units
reconcilable with time and activity being simulated (Video may
help)
.
.
Ideally - no contamination.
Any contamination should be investigated.
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 220
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Validation of Aseptic Processing
Any organisms isolated should be identified to species level
(genotypic identification)
Invalidation of a media fill run should be rare
.
Process and environmental control activities should be included in batch
records and reviewed as part of batch release
IPQC
.
In-process and laboratory control results
.
Environmental and personnel monitoring data
December 14, 2017 Process Validation 222
Dr. Mehdizadeh
Validation of Aseptic Processing
HVAC WFI HEPA
.
Output from support systems(HEPA/HVAC, WFI, steam generator)
Equipment function (batch alarm reports, filter integrity)
. :
Interventions, Deviations, Stoppages - duration and associated time
.SOP
Written instructions regarding need for line clearances
.
Disruptions to power supply