studies regarding its affects at workplace is very deficient. Although its high prevalence results in a number of negative effects (Judge & Cable, 2011) but still there is dearth of literature on stigma at workplace and especially when it comes to HCV stigma because very little attention has been given towards this issue. Contextual gap
In previous studies of stigma, there has not been
direct assessment across cultural contexts (Kalichmanet al., 2005; Reidpath, Brijnath, & Chan, 2005). Brohan, Slade , Clement , Thornicroft (2010) argued that a logical assessment about the stigma research shows that only 5 out of 57 studies have been performed on Asian population which shows that in Asia the research on stigma has been highly neglected. Hofstede (1980) and Triandis (1995) argued it as a main error in existing literature that there is lack of context specific research