Texas Instrument's home computer prices fell from $650 in the mid-1980s to $99 in 1983 due to competitive pressures and technology improvements. As prices fell below TI's $100 variable cost, the firm stopped production but had 500,000 unsold computers. TI dumped the remaining inventory at $49 per unit to minimize losses, as transportation and marketing costs were less than keeping the unsold stock. Other smaller computer firms also exited the market when continuing production meant greater losses than shutting down.
Texas Instrument's home computer prices fell from $650 in the mid-1980s to $99 in 1983 due to competitive pressures and technology improvements. As prices fell below TI's $100 variable cost, the firm stopped production but had 500,000 unsold computers. TI dumped the remaining inventory at $49 per unit to minimize losses, as transportation and marketing costs were less than keeping the unsold stock. Other smaller computer firms also exited the market when continuing production meant greater losses than shutting down.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Texas Instrument's home computer prices fell from $650 in the mid-1980s to $99 in 1983 due to competitive pressures and technology improvements. As prices fell below TI's $100 variable cost, the firm stopped production but had 500,000 unsold computers. TI dumped the remaining inventory at $49 per unit to minimize losses, as transportation and marketing costs were less than keeping the unsold stock. Other smaller computer firms also exited the market when continuing production meant greater losses than shutting down.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
• In mid 1980, Texas Instrument (TI) was selling its
basic home computer for $650. But cost reducing technology and intense competition from firms such as Atari, Commodore, and Tandy drove market prices steadily downward. • By mid 1982, TI had been forced to cut its price to $ 249/- and by early 1983, the firms’ basic computer could be purchased for just $ 149. • Still, because the TI’s variable cost per unit was about $ 100, the firm better off continuing to produce, even at this low price • But improved technology and competitive pressures continued to push prices even lower. By the fall of 1983, market conditions required TI to reduce its price to $ 99. Because this level was less than the $ 100 variable cost, the firm stopped producing home computers. However, at the time of shutdown decision, the company had almost 500000 unsold computers on hand. TI finally got out of the home computer business by dumping its remaining inventory onto the market at $ 49 per unit. • If the variable cost of produing a computer was $ 100, why would the firm be willing to sell its remaining machines for less than that amount? The explanation is that $ 100 was a variable cost before the computers were produced, but a sunk cost afterward. Thus, the firm was better off selling the computers than keeping them as long as the $ 49 price was greater than the transporation and marketing expenses of selling each unit. • TI was not alone in its exit from the home computer market. Dozens of smaller companies also determined that their losses would be less if they shut down than if they continued to produce. Calculating the shutdown price • A lamp manufacturer faces horizontal demand curve. The firm’s total cost are given by the equation • TVC = 150Q – 20 Q2 + Q3 • Where Q is quantity. Below what price the firm shut down its operations? Problems • Suppose the market supply and demand equations for plywood are given by • Qs = 20000 + 30 P • Qd = 40000 – 20 P (a) Determine the equilibrium price and quantity? (b) Suppose an increase in housing starts results in a new demand equation Qd1 = 50000 – 20 P what is the new equilibrium price and quantity? • 2. Use the above market demand and supply schedules? The Plywood industry is perfectly competititve, and the marginal cost equation for one firm Lucknow Plywoods,is given by MC = 200 + 4 Q (a) What is the short run profit maximising output rate for Lucknow plywoods? (b) Average cost is given by AC = 1000/Q + 200 + 2Q. In the short run how much economic profit will the firm earn?