This document discusses two methods for interpreting student assessment results: norm-referenced interpretation and criterion-referenced interpretation. Norm-referenced interpretation compares a student's performance to others in a known group, while criterion-referenced interpretation measures a student's mastery of specific skills or knowledge based on clearly defined tasks. The key differences are that norm-referenced assessments rank students and measure a large number of students over a long period, while criterion-referenced assessments provide a score as a percentage of mastery and measure a small number of students within a single class period.
This document discusses two methods for interpreting student assessment results: norm-referenced interpretation and criterion-referenced interpretation. Norm-referenced interpretation compares a student's performance to others in a known group, while criterion-referenced interpretation measures a student's mastery of specific skills or knowledge based on clearly defined tasks. The key differences are that norm-referenced assessments rank students and measure a large number of students over a long period, while criterion-referenced assessments provide a score as a percentage of mastery and measure a small number of students within a single class period.
This document discusses two methods for interpreting student assessment results: norm-referenced interpretation and criterion-referenced interpretation. Norm-referenced interpretation compares a student's performance to others in a known group, while criterion-referenced interpretation measures a student's mastery of specific skills or knowledge based on clearly defined tasks. The key differences are that norm-referenced assessments rank students and measure a large number of students over a long period, while criterion-referenced assessments provide a score as a percentage of mastery and measure a small number of students within a single class period.
Methods of Interpreting the results Norm-referenced Interpretation • It is used to describe students performance according to relative position in some known group • In this method of interpretation, it is assumed that the level of performance of the students will not vary much from one class to another class. Criterion-referenced Interpretation • It is used to described students performance according to a specified domain of clearly defined learning task. • This method of interpretation is used when the teacher wants to determine how the students have learned specific knowledge or skills in a certain course or subject matter. Norm-referenced Criterion-referenced • To rank students based on test • To measure the skills and achievement. knowledge a student has mastered. • Scores are given as a rank based on • Student scores are given as a other students scores. percent. • Assesses a large number of • Assesses a small number of students. students. • Usually takes a long period a time • Usually lasts only about a class for a students to complete. period. • Developed on a state or national • Developed individually, mostly level. created by the classroom teacher.