Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Data Use Nov 18 9am
Data Use Nov 18 9am
• Implement activities
• Monitor progress
• Identify problems
Policy to Program Operations
• Implement activities
• Monitor progress
• Implement activities
• Monitor progress
CULTURE
SYSTEMS TECHNICAL
APPROACH APPROACH
What do we do next?
What information do we need?
How can we ensure that
information is being used to make
diagnoses and inform decisions?
Context of decision-making
Information
Decision-
Decisions
makers
How?
Context of decision-making
Information
Decision-
Decisions
makers
How?
Who can use data and information?
Who are your stakeholders?
Information
Decision-
Decisions
makers
How?
Decisions
Facilitate use of data by stakeholders
….
Can you provide other examples?
Program Design
….
Can you provide other examples?
Management & Operations
Decision-
Decisions
makers
Data and Information
Census
Vital events data
HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria surveillance data
Household surveys
Facilities level service statistics
Mapping of health facilities and services
Behavioral surveillance
National health accounts
Financial and management information
Modeling, estimates and projections
Health research
Different Needs for Different
Stakeholders: Program Managers & Staff
What M&E measures: What decisions are guided
by M&E results:
Quality of activities and/or services
Resource allocation
Why some sites are more successful
Replication and scaling up of
Program coverage intervention
Fund-raising
What M&E results identify: Motivating staff
Priorities for strategic planning Policy advocacy
Training and supervision needs
How to improve reporting to funding
agency
Feedback from clients
Why program is not accomplishing
what it set out to do
Different Needs for Different Stakeholders:
Funding Agencies & Policy Makers
Description
Helps identify and prioritize key decisions and the
information needed
Timeline for monitoring the decision-making
process
Part A. Policy, planning and advocacy decisions
Incorporate demand One time Permanent Secretary, Ministry Analysis of Information, Review draft Review policy
creation for family of Health Education and Reproductive Health draft August-
planning in the new Family planning non- Communication (IEC) Policy and identify November 2005
Reproductive Health governmental organizations trends from the places to insert Publish final
Policy (NGOs) and donor agencies Demographic and Health recommendations for Reproductive
Surveys (DHS) demand creation. Health Policy in
Revised IEC and Advocacy February 2006
Strategy
Convene conference One time Division of Reproductive Analysis of CBD trends Prepare a concept Complete concept
to review community- Health, Ministry of Health from the DHS surveys paper for the paper January
based distribution Family planning NGOs and Inventory of current CBD conference. 2006
(CBD) strategies for development partners programs Mobilize resource to Convene
Kenya Studies on cost and hold the conference. conference
benefits of CBD programs October 2006
Finalize agreement One time Development partner: Japan Analysis of IEC trends Prepare detailed Negotiations from
with development (on contract International Cooperation Revised IEC and Advocacy project agreement August-December
partner on the renewal, every Agency (JICA) Strategy and implementation 2005
Population Education three years) Division of Reproductive plan. Signed agreement
and Advocacy Project Health, Ministry of Health Finalize negotiations in December 2005
Family planning NGOs with JICA.
Kenya Institute of Mass
Communications
Working Toward a Culture of
Information
Commitment and support for high quality data and
information use at all program levels
Depends on objectivity and a willingness to be self-
critical
Sharing information between levels in info system
Information becomes an integral part of decision
making processes, including planning, problem solving,
choosing alternatives, feedback, etc.
Empowers people to ask questions, seek improvement,
learn, and improve quality through useful information
To sum up
In order to make information useful, we need:
To engage others to discuss what decisions they make
and what information they may find helpful.
Understanding of how programs work, how they collect
and report information.
Training and supervision to support reporting and
documentation.
Common understanding among those who deliver
services and report on them, those who analyze the
data and those who need the information.
Key Messages
Decisions based on evidence lead to better health outcomes
We all have a role in M&E – partners in progress
Involve new counterparts beyond M&E specialists
High quality information is needed for decision-making at
policy, planning and program levels
Purpose of M&E is not just to produce more information but
to improve action
Investments made to improve information systems will be
wasted if it is not used to inform policy and program
decisions
THANK YOU!
MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency
for International Development (USAID) through
Cooperative Agreement GPO-A-00-03-00003-00 and
is implemented by the Carolina Population Center at
the University of North Carolina in partnership with
Futures Group, John Snow, Inc., ORC Macro
International, and Tulane University.