Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented To: Prof. Muhammad Amanullah Khan Presented By: Maryam Nisa CMS # 26538
Presented To: Prof. Muhammad Amanullah Khan Presented By: Maryam Nisa CMS # 26538
A top down
A bottom up
approach
approach to
focusing on
identify which
conceptual
principles were
guidance for
“working” and,
the recognition
therefore,
and
should be
measurement
retained in the
of revenues.
new standard.
Challenges faced by two boards
• IFRS’s have been issued as general guidance of basic accounting principles, lacking
specific guidance on a transaction level. U.S. GAAP on the other hand consists of
specific rules and transaction level guidance on many issues that IFRSs leave to
interpretation.
• A second major issue lies in the difference between the two boards’ definition of
what gives rise to revenue.
According to IFRS, revenue is to be recognized when future economic benefits are
expected to inflow to the entity that can be measured reliably.
Whereas, under the FASB’s guidance revenue is recognized when cash is realized or
realizable and such revenue has been earned, without regard to the balance sheet
implications of the transaction.
A step towards a unified standard on
revenue recognition
• In December 2008, IASB and FASB issued a discussion paper entitled “Preliminary
views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customers.”
• In the proposed standard the boards are adopting an asset-liability approach.
• In June 2010, a revision of exposure draft is issued. The new document left the basis
of the proposal the same and added implementation guidance and a tentative date
for adoption.
Revenue Recognition: A five step process
• Recognizing revenue under the standard would be a five-step process:
1. Identify the contract with a customer.
2. Identify the separate performance obligations in the contract.
3. Determine the transaction price.
4. Allocate the transaction price.
5. Recognize revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied.
Recommendations
• To accommodate the specific needs of financial statement preparers and users of
various countries and industries, a degree of flexibility should be provided in the
new worldwide standard.
• IASB should establish international subcommittees to develop industry specific
modifications to the overriding standard.
• International subcommittees would be able to address the structure of customer
contract under the new standard to ensure consistent application of the standard.