PLANNING, ANALYSIS

AND DESIGN OF IT
PARK
 BATCH MEMBERS
 Hitangshu Bhoumick (42007103312)
 P. Manju (42007103012)
 S. Saranya (42007103027)

GUIDED BY:
Mr. K.VIJAYASRINIVASAN
(ASSISTANT PROFESSER)
INTRODUCTION

 Information technology (IT) Park has emerged as the

most effective driver in the fast century.
Transforming all sphere of life. During the period,
India software engineer and professionals have made
significant contribution to the technological
advancements in the field.
 OBJECTIVE

 TO Prepare plan of an IT building (IT park) using

Auto CAD D.
 TO Analysis the Structure using STADD PRO.
 To Design the Structural elements manually such as
 Foundation
 Columns
 Flat Slab
 Stair case etc.,
 CONTINUED.,
 To Design the building as an earthquake
resistant structure.
(Study an seismic design)
 To design the building as a green building.
 STUDY AREA
 LOCATION : RATHINAMAGALAM
 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

• Referred :
Visit an Tata consultancy
service at (seruseri)
 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
 J.A.Rodegriguez and J.Dario (1999) reported that an
analytical model by which the theoretical strength of R.C
Column of an arbitrary cross-section subjected to axial force
and biaxial moment can be determined.
 Amir Mirmiran, reported that the variation in tensile strength
of typical FRP bars does not affect slenderness of R.C
Columns and the yielding phenomenon of reinforcing bars, in
and of itself, does not affect slenderness of R.C.Columns.
 John F.fleming and Stuart D. Werner (1965) presented a
simplified ultimate strength method of design for column
subjected to bending about both principle axes and a set of
non-dimensional design curves for one particular section
geometry is given for commonly encountered values of steel
percentage, concrete strength and steel yield stress.
 Continued,
 Elizabeth A. Young, Standardizing Design Fires For Residential
Buildings. The introduction of standardized design fires will
improve the design and approval process of fire safety designs. This
will ensure that individual and society expectations regarding the
levels of fire safety provided in residential buildings are more
likely to be achieved in practice.

 Ms. Noushin Ehsan, in 2000 has evoked awareness of space and

developed features to improve the quality of our man-made
environment. She has been a keynote speaker and lecturer in many
universities, national and international conferences in the US, China,
Japan, Thailand, Singapore, Iran, Russia, Turkey, Bulgaria, Czech
Republic, Croatia, Slovenia, Ireland, England, Italy, Germany, and
South Africa.
 Continued.,

 Krishna Raju, N., 2009 “Design of Reinforced Concrete

Structures”, CBS Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi.

Jain, A.K.,2007 “Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete

Structures”, Nemchand Publications, Rourkee.

Sinha, S.N., “Reinforced Concrete Design”, Tata McGraw-

Hill Publishing Company Ltd., New Delhi.

 We also referred Pune IT Park for facilities and other

information in IT park.
 NEED FOR STUDY
 Development of infrastructure.
 Job opportunities.
 Economical development of country.
 METHODOLOGY

 Planning the IT Park as a multi storied

building using the software AUTO CADD.
 The structure ha been analyzed using the
software STAAD.PRO
 The material used in the structure is concrete
M 20, steel Fe 415.
 Continued,
 By considering the load on the structure, such
as dead load ( self weight of the slab, wall
load, parapet load, self weight of the stair case)
live load ( slab, live load on the stair
case)seismic load(in X-direction, Z-direction,-
X direction,-Z direction) wind load(in X-
direction, Z-direction,-X direction,-Z
direction).
 The above given loads are combined as
 Continued,
 1.5 dead load +1.5 live load
 1.5 dead load +1.5 wind load in X direction
 1.5 dead load +1.5 wind load in Z direction
 1.5 dead load +1.5 wind load in -X direction
 1.5 dead load +1.5 wind load in -Z direction
 0.9dead load +1.2 live load +1.2 wind load
 Continued,
 0.9dead load +1.2 live load +1.2 wind load in X
direction
 0.9 dead load +1.2 live load +1.2 wind load in X
direction
 0.9 dead load +1.2 live load +1.2 wind load in -Z
direction
 1.5 dead load +1.5 seismic load in X direction
 1.5 dead load +1.5 seismic load in Z direction
 1.5 dead load +1.5 seismic load in- X direction
 Continued,
 1.5 dead load +1.5 seismic load in-Z direction
 1.2 dead load +1.2 live load + 1.2 seismic load
in X direction
 1.2 dead load +1.2 live load + 1.2 seismic load
in Z direction
 1.2 dead load +1.2 live load + 1.2 seismic load
in -X direction.
 Continued.,
 The building is planned and design as a green
building, to fulfill the Indian green building
council rules and regulations.

 Design the building for wind load as per code

IS 875 part III.
 Special features of building
 Environmental Friendly
Green building
Maximum use of wind
Solar energy
Natural ventilation
Water treatment
Compact structure
Land scapping
Fire protection system.
Smoke free environment
Electrical safety
Emergency exit
Treated water for irrigation
Interior decoration
 Functional
Innovation
World class quality
Creative environment
Efficiency
Service in centre
Open office planning
Training facility
Customer care center
Club house
Phases
Conference hall
Gym
Amphitheater
Co2 emission check in underground parking
Creativity
 ABOUT FACILITIES
 Well equipped auditorium for the use of
occupant and other trade organization.
 Premises & Facility management by
multinational agency.
 Conference hall for seminar, workshop, and
training programmer.
 Green atmosphere.
 Including extension area.
 Reducing carbon footprints.
 DATA COLLECTION

 Safe bearing capacity of soil of our location is

200 kN/m2.
 Depth of water table is 3m.
 Depth of foundation 2.1m (we refered existing
Buildings surrounding our plot)
Structural Drawing
 PROPERTY DETAILS
 Plot area = 5 acre =20250sq.m ( 1 acre=
4050sq.m)
 Total built up area = 12320 sq.m
 Site extent = shall not be less then 2000sq.m
 N
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SECOND FLOOR PLAN N
 N

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

FRONT ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
SECTION B-B
 OUR BUILDING IS
ANALYSISED BY
USING STAAD.PRO
SOFTWARE
The result obtained from software
Stad.pro was obtained satisfactorily
 STAAD OUTPUT
MEMBER END FORCES OF COLUMNS
3D MODEL OF IT BUILDING
 Structural Design
DESIGN OF FLAT SLAB
 Column size = 500 x 500mm
 Center to center distance between column is
4000mm
 Size of drop = (2 x 2)m
 Depth of slab =150mm
 Depth of drop of slab =225mm.
 Provide 10mm ф at 200mm c/c for drop.
 Ast provided for drop = 393.5mm2
Positive reinforcement in column strips:
 Ast provided= 244.4mm2

 Assuming 10mmф at 300mm spacing

Reinforcement of the middle strips:

Negative reinforcement in middle strip:
 Assuming 10mmф bar at 300mm spacing

 Ast provided=160.71mm2

Positive reinforcement in the middle strip:

 Assuming 10mm ф bar at 300mm c/c spacing

 Ast provided = 174.44mm2

Reinforcement Detail of Flat
Slab
Reinforcement Detail of Flat
Slab
 DESIGN OF FOOTING
 COLUMN SIZE = 500 X 500
 LOAD = 986 kN
 MOMENT =Mx = 193.26 kN-m
My = 182.49 kN-m
 S.B.C = 200 kN/m2
 M20,Fe415
 Continued,
 Provide 2.4 x 2.4 m footing.
 Assume overall depth = 650 mm
 Effective cover = 30 + 10 = 40 mm
 Actual effective depth = d = 650 – 40 = 610
mm
 16 mm Dia ,10 bars
 Ast provided = 2010 mm2
 DESIGN OF SQUARE COLUMN
WITH BIAXIAL BENDING
 Size of column = 50x50 cm
 Concrete mix = M20
 Characteristic strength of reinforcement = 415
N/mm2
 Factored load Pu = 827.45 kN
 Factored moment acting parallel
 to the large dimension, MuX = 191.285 kN
 Factored moment acting parallel
 to the shorter dimension,Muy = 42.6 kN
 p = 1.2%
 Ast = 3000 mm2
 Assume 20 mm dia
No of bars = 9.5 say 12 nos
 LATERAL TIES:
 Assume 8mm dia
 Spacing:
 500 mm
 16 x 16 = 256mm
 300mm
 provide 8mm dia 250 mm c/c
REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
OF COLUMN & FOOTING
 DESIGN OF STAIR CASE
 Size of stair = 5.5m x 5.5m
Vertical distance between the floor = 4m
 Live load = 4kN/m2
 Use fe415 steel and M20 grade of concrete
 provide 150mm riser.
 Number of riser required = 13 numbers.

Number of threads in each flight = 12
numbers.
 Width of steps = 270mm
 Continued,
 Horizontal length of the steps = 0.27 x 12
= 3.6m
 Assume the width of landing= 1.9m

 Let the thickness of waist slab = 150mm.

 Adopt 8 mm diameter bars at 250 mm c/c.
With Ast provided = 1145.34 mm2
 CONCLUSION
The design of IT park had been designed by
using “limit state method” .
 Since Chennai falls on seismic zone IV, we
had design the structure as a seismic resistance.
 As the building height is 17m, we are
considering wind load for wind action.
For IT Park we have designed flat slab, footing,

column, stair case.

 REFERANCE
Bureau of Indian Standards – Indian Standards – Code of
Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete: IS 456 – 2000” New
Delhi.

“Bureau of Indian Standards – Design Aids for Reinforced

Concrete to IS: 456-2000”, New Delhi.

Varghese, P.C., 2009 “Limit State Design of Reinforced

Concrete Structures”, Prentice Hall of India, Pvt. Ltd., New
Delhi.

Krishna Raju, N., 2009 “Design of Reinforced Concrete

Structures”, CBS Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi.
 Continued
Jain, A.K.,2007 “Limit State Design of Reinforced
Concrete Structures”, Nemchand Publications,
Rourkee.

Sinha, S.N., “Reinforced Concrete Design”, Tata

McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd., New Delhi.

Unnikrishna Pillai, s., Devadas Menon, 2008

“Reinforced Concrete Design”, Tata McGraw-Hill
Publishing Company Ltd., New Delhi.