This document discusses counterproductive behaviors and employee discipline in Philippine organizations. It begins by defining counterproductive behaviors as actions that undermine an organization's goals. Common counterproductive behaviors discussed include tardiness, absenteeism, substance abuse, and antagonistic behaviors. The document then examines how Filipino culture, which values interpersonal relationships and group cohesion, relates to counterproductive behaviors in the workplace. Several studies are referenced that link factors like job fit, organizational commitment, workload, and control to employee turnover, burnout, and other issues. Specific counterproductive behaviors discussed include relational aggression, spreading rumors, backstabbing, sexual harassment, discrimination, internet use, gossiping, and favoritism. The document concludes by outlining
Original Description:
Original Title
Counterproductive behaviors and employee discipline.pptx
This document discusses counterproductive behaviors and employee discipline in Philippine organizations. It begins by defining counterproductive behaviors as actions that undermine an organization's goals. Common counterproductive behaviors discussed include tardiness, absenteeism, substance abuse, and antagonistic behaviors. The document then examines how Filipino culture, which values interpersonal relationships and group cohesion, relates to counterproductive behaviors in the workplace. Several studies are referenced that link factors like job fit, organizational commitment, workload, and control to employee turnover, burnout, and other issues. Specific counterproductive behaviors discussed include relational aggression, spreading rumors, backstabbing, sexual harassment, discrimination, internet use, gossiping, and favoritism. The document concludes by outlining
This document discusses counterproductive behaviors and employee discipline in Philippine organizations. It begins by defining counterproductive behaviors as actions that undermine an organization's goals. Common counterproductive behaviors discussed include tardiness, absenteeism, substance abuse, and antagonistic behaviors. The document then examines how Filipino culture, which values interpersonal relationships and group cohesion, relates to counterproductive behaviors in the workplace. Several studies are referenced that link factors like job fit, organizational commitment, workload, and control to employee turnover, burnout, and other issues. Specific counterproductive behaviors discussed include relational aggression, spreading rumors, backstabbing, sexual harassment, discrimination, internet use, gossiping, and favoritism. The document concludes by outlining
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIORS - Define as behaviors that explicitly run counter to the goals on an organization (JEX 2002) - The most commonly studied counterproductive behaviors have been tardiness and absenteeism and their impact on organizational commitment and withdrawal (SHAIRA- LISHCHINSKY AND EVAN ZOHAR 2011) - Alcoholism and its relationship with increased absence from work (BACHARACH, BAMBERGER AND BIRON 2010), and the effect of substance abuse on work performance and increasing antagonistic behaviors (JEX 2002) COUNTERPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR IN THE PHILIPPINE ORGANIZATION FELIPE LANDA JOCANO Being a collectivist in a society, Filipinos give higher importance to interpersonal relations than westerns. Employee consider workmates as friend and that relationships go to beyond work to affect personal lives. An example is the Filipino value of “pakikisama”, which means to concerned about, to be supportive of and to concede to public opinion in social situations in order to achieve group cohesion. SAITO ET AL - Suggested that Filipinos tend to be motivated and productive when working when group or teams with face to face interaction. Given this collectivist culture, counterproductive behaviors may involve interaction with other people or may be motivated by social relationships. THIS VALUE HAS TWO FACES: One that allows smooth interpersonal relationships to occur.
The other may create groupthink or
cohesion so strong, it may actually encourage counterproductive behavior. EMPLOYEE TURNOVER Employee turnover refers to the number or percentage of workers who leave an organization and are replaced by new employees. Measuring employee turnover can be helpful to employers that want to examine reasons for turnover or estimate the cost-to-hire for budget purposes. According to the 2011 Labor Turnover Survey conducted among 700 large enterprises in Metro Manila, turnover rate across industries is at 8.5 percent.
However, the story is different in the call
center industry where about 27 percent of call center agents leave their companies only after six months to a year service. Turnover, Job Fit, and Organizational Commitment
A number of local studies have found that other factors such
as job fit and organizational commitment have strong impact on turnover. A study conducted among 140 employees of multinational company in the Philippines found that poor organizational commitment, job satisfaction, supervision, and teamwork contribute to turnover intent.
Too reduce turnover, there must be an increase in
self – worth, competency, and meaning task required. Burnout is define as a “syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduce personal accomplishment” (Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner and Schaufeli 2001) There are number of variables found to influence burnout. For example, a study done by Cera (2005) among 124 teachers that found that educators’ experiences of emotional exhaustion are negatively related to workload, control, reward, community, and values. Tis means that these factors lead to varying levels of job burnout or emotional exhaustion which influence the teachers, to quit. Relational Aggression Relational aggression demonstrated between groups or individual with the intention of destroying relationship structures in the organization. It can take the form of verbal and non – verbal action meant to utilize sociability processes to create animosity. Spreading rumors can be either positive or negative. However, the majority of rumors are typically negative, sometimes leaning on the offensive or the derogatory. These rumors can range from valid and reliable facts, to the false information aimed to destroy reputations. Backstabbing The study also looked at individuals who were the subject of rumors. They were reported to have low sociability scores that may have led to interaction with other members of the organization. Since they cannot spread rumors because of the lack of people who will listen, they end up demonstrating behaviors meant to sabotage tasks or duties of the in – group. Sexual Harassment Considered as one of the severe forms of the counterproductive behavior, sexual harassment takes various forms: it can begin at cracking sexual jokes, sexual statement such as sharing one’s sexual activities, passing notes with sexual innuendo, and can move on to making sexual advances, asking sexual favors, or even the extreme touching oneself sexually in front of the one being harassed. DISCRIMINATION Discrimination is define as “the applied prejudice is which negative social definitions are translated into action” (Feagin and Eckberg 1980). Those perceived to have less influence, power or authority in a social setting tend to be more prone to discrimination. The most common in the Philippine workplace appears to be related to gender identity, and school discrimination. Gender Discrimination One of the most common type of discrimination in organizations leveled against women workers. For instance, according Bureau of Labor and Employment Statistics released in 2011, the rate of unemployment for women in 2010 is lower on the average compared to men.
The study showed that women felt discriminated against in terms of
promotion. They perceived that “connections’ or “palakasan system” was at play for promotions: men who knew people or had connections with top management officials were the first to received raises or increase or job levels. Women felt discriminated because they lacked padrinos (patron) or were not favored by their supervisors (Edralin 2003) Another common discrimination occurring the organization based on perceptions and biases on schools. A study conducted by Ortega – Go, Drilon, and Mier in 2008 on job advertisement for entry – level managerial positions showed that 37 percent expressed implicit preference for particular schools tagged as “reputable’ or prestigious”. Seven percent of these organization mentioned the “Big 3” schools – Ateneo de Manila University, De Lassale University, and the Univeersity of the Philippines as preferred with the occasional addition of the University of Santo Tomas and the University of Asia Pacific. TARDINESS
A survey conducted by the authors among sixty
participants from various industrial, academic, government, and non – profit organizations showed that participants observe tardiness as the most prevalent counterproductive behavior. When asked what counterproductive behaviors they themselves are doing, the participants admitted that being tardy at work tops their list. A common reason cited for tardiness is commuting and traffic. Gossiping Second in the survey was gossiping among members of the organization. This rooted from the societal and collectivist nature of the Filipino, as described earlier in this chapter. Internet use Ranked third was accessing social networking sites while working. Though most good consider this a way of de – stressing during work brakes, this eats away at company time. When an employee engrossed in accessing a site, is causes prolonged breaks. Some employees deliberately access such social websites even during regular work hours resulting in lowered productivity. Absenteeism The fourth behavior most prevalent is absenteeism. This is related to tardiness, where the employee may need time away from work to deal with family affairs or care for young children. The employees admitted that their reasons for absenteeism are similar to what they observe from their officemates. Favoritism The fifth, interestingly, is the occurrence of favoritism in the workplace. This is particularly evident when employees struggle for the same or limited positions within an organization. By playing favorites with their bosses, they, at the very least, become familiar to their superiors, and at most are considered during succession planning. DEALING WITH COUNTERPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR Respondents in the study shared that the time – tested process of talking directly to the person is still the number one choice for correcting counterproductive behavior this is done by inviting the erring individual to his or her direct superiors office, to the Employee Relations office, or to any higher office as necessary as an alternative, superiors can talk to the employee on the spot to rectify the actions. Management has the legal right to: 1. Hire employee as a subjected to the limitations found in law, collective bargaining agreement and general principles of fair play and justice. 2. Change the working hours of the employees for the advancement of the employers interest and not for the purpose of defeating the rights of the employees. 3. Prescribe rules as deemed necessary and proper for the conduct of its business and to provide certain disciplinary measures implementing this to assure they will be complied to. If the rules are violated, then management has the right to discipline its employees. 4. Transfer or reassign employees provided there is no demotion in rank or diminution of salary, benefits and other privileges. 5. Demote any employee provided is not tainted with unfair labor practice. Employees can be demoted, but without reduction in salary due to figure to observe proper diligence at work, habitual tardiness and indolence.
6. Dismiss an employee pursuant to
the company rules and regulations,, this must be done without abuse of discretion. On the other hand, specific right of the employees are: 1. Self organization as mentioned in Article 243 of the labor code; this right to organize cannot be bargained away and in fact middle managers can form their own labor organizations as they fit. 2. Conduct collective bargaining or negotiation with management, as stipulated in Article 255 of the labor code. 3. Engage is concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law. 4. Enjoy security of tenure which is a right of paramount value recognized and guaranteed under the Philippine Constitution. 5. Work under humane conditions. 6. Living wage or the amount of family income needed to provide. 7. Participate in policy decision – making process affecting their rights to and benefits as may provided by the law. Implications This chapter shed light on various western and Philippine studies on counterproductive behaviors. It discussed common behaviors and conceptual differences between the literature: Western studies have focused more on the individualistic practices of counter – productivity while Filipino literature has stressed how social and interpersonal relationships come into play. Philippine studies on job turnover and burnout, relational aggression, discrimination and sexual harassment were discussed, and a study conducted by the authors highlighted the current trends in counterproductive behaviors. Although it may be impossible to totally eliminate counterproductive behaviors, there are measures and organizations may take to decrease and discourage these behaviors.