WORKSHOP:

MEPA SIMULATION
The 10-20-70 or the Principle of
Learning Continuum upholds
‘Learning by doing principle.’
 WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES
• At the end of the WORKSHOP, the participants are
expected to:

a. Make a Completed Staff Work (CSW) for the 1st

Quarterly SMEPA using both the qualitative and
quantitative tools (School Heads);
b. Prepare a presentation based on the given dashboard;
c. Simulate the conduct of SMEPA by observing the
essential processes, Term of Reference (TOR) of the
persons involved, and facilitation and synthesizing
skills; and
d. Develop deeper understanding on the importance of
SMEPA in enhancing efficiency and effectiveness of
governance of basic education delivery.
WORKSHOP TASK: BY GROUP

Group • Focus on Quality

1 • Quarter 1: NAT

Group • Focus on Access

2 • Quarter 2: Enrolment

Group • Focus on Access

3 • Quarter 3: Drop-out
 TASK TO DO
1. Make a Completed Staff Work (CSW)
for the Quarterly SMEPA using both
the qualitative and quantitative tools.
2. Prepare a presentation based on the
given dashboard.
3. Simulate the conduct of SMEPA by
observing the essential processes,
Term of Reference (TOR) of the
persons involved, and facilitation and
synthesizing skills.
 TASK TO DO
I. Information Requirements on KPIs for
Quality
A. Dashboard
• Presents a three year data on achievement (2011-
2014) broken-down per level & subject (Grade 3 &
Grade 6 /Year IV).
• Shows comparative graphs and tables to provide
MPS by subject: Aral. Pan. Filipino, English, Math
and Science.
• Performance of school will be presented using the
achievement quartile ratio (how many students
belong to the following Quartile: 0-25; 26-50; 51-
75; 76-100).
 TASK TO DO
I. Information Requirements on KPIs for Quality
B. Segmentation
• Make Data map showing the performance and mean
percent score (MPS) (ex. by Gender & Tribe)
C. Analyses
• Describes the programs and/or practices implemented
leading to improve performance or achievement.
• Explains the context (environmental factors)
contributing to poor pupils/students
performance/achievement.
• Explains why the school is unable to improve
achievements despite programs on related to quality
education.
 TASK TO DO
I. Information Requirements on KPIs for
Quality
D. Proposed Actions
• Describes measures to undertake to sustain
DepED programs on quality.
• Provides suggestions on how to improve programs
on quality to minimize effects of environmental
factors contributing to MPS.
• Suggests actions or measures that will address the
limitations or weaknesses of DepED programs on
quality.
• Suggests new policies and/or enhancements in
DepED policies and systems related to quality.
 TASK TO DO
II. Implementation status of the AIP; 15 Programs,
Projects, Activities (PPAs) and Foreign Assisted
Projects (FAP) including NGO Projects, if any:
• Using S-Curve, the school will report the
implementation of the following in term of its
Physical and Financial accomplishment (Actual vs
Target – just make assumption only for the first
month of 2015):
1. AIP Implementation,
2. Implementation Status of the 15 PPAs (SPED, MG,
Madrasah, etc.) and
3. Any Foreign-Assisted Projects (FAP) including NGO
Projects: Save the Children, UNICEF, Pasali, Plan
International, etc.
 TASK TO DO
III. Agenda affecting program design, policy,
standard, system and technical assistance
needed.
• Provides suggestions on how to improve programs
on quality to minimize effects of environmental
factors contributing to KPI on Quality.
• Suggests actions or measures that will address the
limitations or weaknesses of DepED programs.
• Suggests new policies and/or enhancements in
DepED policies and systems related to KPI on
Quality.
 PRESENTER BY BATCH
Batch II-A: Elementary
• Cluster A: North Cotabato, Sarangani, Cotabato City
• Cluster B: North Cotabato: Group 1, 2 & 3

Batch II-B: Elementary

• Cluster A: GSC, South Cotabato, Kidapawan
• Cluster B: Sultan Kudarat, Koronadal, Tacurong

Batch III: Secondary

• Cluster A: North Cot., GSC, Kidapawan City
• Cluster B: Sultan Kudarat, Cotabato City, Koronadal,
Sarangani, Tacurong, South Cotabato
 ROLE OF THE SCHOOL PLANNING TEAM (SPT)
& SCHOOL HEAD IN THE SMEPA AS CONVENOR
SMEPA DESIGN
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION PERSONS IN-
CHARGE
1. Opening Presentation of Objectives, Activity flow and EMCEE & Opening
Roll call of attendance Speaker
2. Presentation by Each of the Grade Level / Department Heads Curriculum Level /
Grade Level / presents their findings on the KPI , Physical & Department Heads
Department Heads Financial Accomplishments of (AIP)

3. Discussion of Discussion leader pose questions to the School Discussion

Presentation presenter to clarify essential points every after Leaders
presentation.

4. Synthesis of A synthesizer listens to all presentations and School Synthesizer

Discussion discussions and gives the summary of the & Documenter
main points. The synthesizer list down all the
issues and concerns on which decisions need
to be made.
5. Agreement The SH discusses the issues listed and leads SH/PSDS
the group in coming up with agreements on
program adjustments, Policy Directions to be
flagged to SDO as well as TA needs
SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: QUALITY (1st Quarter)

Eng. SGC
Coord.

Math SGC
Coord.

Legend:
Sci PSDS – Public Schools District Supervisor
SGC
Coord.
SCH – Secondary Cluster Head
BLGU – Barangay LGU
SH – School Head
SGC – School Governing Council
Fil. SGC
Coord. PTA – Parents-Teachers Association
GC – Guidance Counselor (Designate)

PTA
AP Pres.
Coord.

Special
PSDS
Program GC SH BLGU
Coord. /SCH
SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: ACCESS ELEMENTARY
(Big SCHOOL)
Kin-
der SGC

Grade
1
Level SGC
Chair
Legend:
Grade PSDS – Public Schools District Supervisor
2
Level SCH – Secondary Cluster Head SGC
Chair
AP – Assistant Principal
AH – Academic Head
Grade BLGU – Barangay LGU
3
Level SGC – School Governing Council SGC
Chair PTA – Parents-Teachers Association
GC – Guidance Counselor (Designate)
Grade
4
Level PTA
Chair Pres.

Grade Grade
5 6 AP/ Prin- PSDS
GC BLGU
Level Level AH cipal /SCH
Chair Chair
SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: ACCESS SECONDARY

Grade
7 SGC
Chair

Grade
8
Level SGC
Chair
Legend:
Grade
9 SCH – Secondary Cluster Head SGC
Level
Chair
AP – Assistant Principal
AH – Academic Head
BLGU – Barangay LGU
Grade
10 SGC – School Governing Council
Level
SGC
Chair
PTA – Parents-Teachers Association
GC – Guidance Counselor (Designate)

PTA
GC Pres.

AP/ Prin-
SCH BLGU
AH cipal
 SIMULATION TIME ALLOTMENT:
1. Opening Program ……………………………. 5 minutes
2. Presentation …………………………………… 20 Minutes
Part I:
Group 1: Quality: NAT MPS by Subject (Subject Coordinator)
Group 2: Access: Enrolment Pattern (Grade Level Chairman)
Group 3: Access: Drop-out - PARDOs/SARDOs (Grade Level Chairman)
Part II: (Only if applicable)
* AIP Implementation (School Head)
* 15 nationally-funded PPAs: SPED/SPA/SPS (Coordinator)
* Other PPAs from FAP or NGOs (School Head)
Part III: Agenda affecting program design, policy, standard,
system and technical assistance needed (School Head)
3. Interpellation/Discussion…………………………. 7 minutes
4. Synthesis ……………………………………………… 2 minutes
5. Agreement …………………………………………….. 3 minutes
 ANALYSIS

1.How did you find the activity?

2. What went well in the
simulation activity?
3.What did not go well?
4.What needs to be improved?
Why?
5.What learning insights have you
gained from the activity?
TIME TO REFLECT
In DepEd XII we uphold
the Principle:
 One Message,
 One Character,
 One Direction!