Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Value Chain Management: The Concept of Value Addition in Supply Chains
Value Chain Management: The Concept of Value Addition in Supply Chains
Profit
cost value
Activity
View your organisation through the lens of a
cost-price-value value triangle. What value
does your organisation deliver to its
customers?
Does the price offer consumers an attractive
exchange value?
Can the resource cost be justified?
Porter’s value chain
The term value chain was used by Michael
Porter (1985)
Organisations are more than the random
compilation of resources but an arrangement of
the resources into systems and activities that
result in products which customers are willing to
pay for
Management of these activities and their
linkages give an organisation competitive
advantage
Basic model of Porter’s value chain
Support activities
Firm infrastructure (General management, IT systems)
Out
Marketi
Inbound bound
operations ng & Service
logistics logistic
sales
s
Primary activities
Primary activities
Distinguishes between primary and support
activities
Primary activities are directly concerned with the
creation or delivery of the product or service
Can be grouped into five main areas:
Inbound logistics
Operations
Outbound logistics
Marketing and sales
service
Support activities
Each of the primary activities is linked to
support activities which help to improve their
effectiveness or efficiency
The four support activities are:
Procurement
technology development (including R&D)
Human resource management
Infrastructure ( systems for planning, finance,
quality, information management etc)
Margin
Implies that organizations realize profits margins
that depend on their ability to manage linkages
between all activities in a value chain
An organisation is able to deliver a product or
service for which the customer is willing to pay
more than the sum of the costs of all activities
Linkages: flows of information, goods and
services, as well as systems and processes for
adjusting activities
Hines value chain
Important features:
Critique of Porter’s value chain
Points to the opposite of Porter’s model
emphasizing differences in objectives and
processes
Demand a function of collective customer-defined
price levels
Emphasis on collaboration in the value chain
Hines’ value chain model
Raw Supplier Inbound operations Outbound Customer consumer
materials chain logistics logistics chain
Marketing team
Materials team
Engineering team
Jointly define value at Defined product value
Quality team
each stage R&D team and volume
Design team
HRM/training/education
Profit
Hines’ Value chain
Primary activities are teams (marketing,
materials, engineering, quality, R&D and design
teams)
Secondary activities are ABC, HRM/training/
education, TQM, EDI, profit
The importance of these secondary activities is
as follows:
ABC: enables the exact cost of products and benefits of
activities such as kaizen, value analysis to be
ascertained
Hines’ Value chain
HRM, especially employee training and education
facilitates effectiveness, efficiency and proactive thinking
TQM provides a culture for all network members
EDI together with intranets, extranets and so on facilitate
quick response to customer’s requirements and draw
network members together
Profit should be roughly equalized between network
members and should result from cost reductions and
acceptable price for customers
Contrast of Porter and Hines’ models
Porter Hines
Profitability Consumer satisfaction
Pull system
Push system
One large flow pointing from
Series of chains linking firms consumer to raw material
pointing from raw materials source
source to customer
Inbound logistics, operations,
Teams concerned with
marketing, materials,
outbound logistics, marketing engineering quality, R&D and
& sales, service design
Firm structure, HRM,
technology development, Activity based costing, HRM/
procurement training/ education, TQM,
EDI, profit
Day’s value chain
Day (1990): value chain requires a comparison of all
the skills and resources the firm uses to perform
each activity
Useful for comparing relative cost position
Based on Porter’s framework but differs in that it
highlights marketing as a general management
function that ensures an external orientation to all
value creating activities
Day’s Marketing driven value chain
Human Resource
Integrative Technology Development
functions Control systems
Marketing
Development
•Strategic partnerships
chain
Source •Supplier selection
•Supply contracts
Supply chain
Recap….