0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views7 pages

Kiln Capacity Upgradation Plan

The document discusses proposed upgrades to Kiln I and Kiln II to increase their production capacities. For Kiln II, the target capacity is 8000 TPD, up from the present 6980 TPD. Several bottlenecks are identified along with suggested modifications and actions by BCL to address each bottleneck. Similarly for Kiln I, the target is 6300 TPD, up from the current 6050 TPD, and bottlenecks and proposed solutions are outlined. Raw mill upgrades are also proposed for both units to handle the increased throughput.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views7 pages

Kiln Capacity Upgradation Plan

The document discusses proposed upgrades to Kiln I and Kiln II to increase their production capacities. For Kiln II, the target capacity is 8000 TPD, up from the present 6980 TPD. Several bottlenecks are identified along with suggested modifications and actions by BCL to address each bottleneck. Similarly for Kiln I, the target is 6300 TPD, up from the current 6050 TPD, and bottlenecks and proposed solutions are outlined. Raw mill upgrades are also proposed for both units to handle the increased throughput.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UPGRADATION OF UNIT I & II

Based on
Recommendation By Mr. Larsen
and
Reviewed by BCL
Kiln II

• Present capacity : 6980 TPD


• Max. Capacity identified : 8600 TPD
• Target capacity : 8000 TPD*
* i) Based on minimum modification &
investment level
ii) Limiting thermal loading to max. 5.6
which is practical ( Mr. Larsen suggested
for 6.0 Gcal/m2hr )
iii) Limiting kiln speed to 5.5 RPM which is
practically safe ( Mr. Larsen suggested
for 7.0 RPM)
iv) Limiting pressure drop across PH cyclones
to 850 mmWg (Larsen suggested 900 mmWg )
v) Retention time in Calciners is adequate
Kiln II – Bottlenecks for 8000 TPD

Present Required Action

• Kiln speed 4.65 RPM 5.5 - 6.0 RPM Under examination


by FLS

• Thermal loading 4.9 Gcal/[Link] 5.6 Gcal/[Link] Will be increased


after increase in kiln speed

• PH Downcomer To increase prodn. Gas cooling system


Gas Cooling by to 7500 TPD under commissiong
max. 90 Deg C

• Tipping of PH Fans To increase prodn. Presently it is deferred.


to 8000 TPD Awaiting result of gas
cooling
P.S.
Kiln specific power consumption will increase from present 7.5 kWh/t to 8.0 kWh/t

Mr Larsen also suggested to modify top stage cyclone to reduce sp. power cons.
However this is not being considered presently; being a major modification.
Other suggestion is to install swing water cooler, which in our opinion is not required.
Raw Mill – II Bottlenecks for 8000 TPD

Present Required

• Capacity 470 TPH 550 TPH


Suggested Modification Action By BCL

• Increase grinding pressure : Already the pressure is at upper safe practical


upto [Link] value limit, however we are trying to maximize
pressure under close observation
• Reduce bed thickness : Bed thickness has been reduced, results under
( Potential increase 40 TPH) observation
• Supply 50 Hz power frequency : It will be tried to supply better quality of
( Potential increase 15 TPH) power through CPP
• Improve separator sealing : Sealing has been improved. Result under
( Potential increase 20 TPH) observation
• Reducing feed size to Mill : Option of secondary crushing is under
( Potential increase 20 TPH) formulation
• Improve running hrs of Raw Mill : Shut down planning rescheduled to improve
to 22.5 hrs. / day running hrs.
Kiln I

• Present capacity : 6050 TPD


• Max. Capacity identified : 7800 TPD
• Target capacity : 6300 TPD*

* i) Based on minimum modification &


investment level (For 7800 TPD, complete
modification of PH tower will be required)
ii) Limiting kiln speed to 5.0 RPM which is
practically safe ( Mr. Larsen suggested
for 6.0 RPM)
iii) Limiting safe pressure drop across PH cyclones
to 850 mmWg of existing level (Larsen suggested
950 mmWg)
iv) Increase in production may be obtained through
increasing load on kiln string as per Mr. Larsen
v) Retention time of 2.6 sec is adequate for 6300
TPD
Kiln I – Bottlenecks for 6300 TPD

Present Required Action

• Kiln speed 4.25 RPM 5.0 RPM Under examination


by FLS

• PH Downcomer Installed but not To be operative Water spray started.


Gas Cooling operative Result under
observation

• Damper before PH fan Louvre damper Shut-off damper Procurement under


process

• Water spray system in No cooling To reduce pressure Inquiry is being sent


top stage cyclone system drop across PH
Tower
Raw Mill – I Bottlenecks

Present Required

• Capacity 410 TPH 435 TPH

Suggested Modification Action By BCL


• Increase grinding pressure : Already the pressure is at upper safe
practical limit, however we are trying to
maximize pressure under close observation
• Supply 50 Hz power frequency : It will be tried to supply better quality of
(Potential increase 10 TPH) power through CPP
• Replacement of separator rotor : Inquiries sent
(Potential increase 20 TPH)
• Reducing feed size to Mill : Option of secondary crushing is under
(Potential increase 10 TPH) formulation
• Improve running hrs of Raw Mill : Shut down planning rescheduled to improve
to 22.5 hrs/day running hrs.

You might also like