You are on page 1of 31

The Efficient

Market
Hypothesis

8
1
EVIDENCE ?

An example from Adaptive Market by Andrew Lo

2
3
4
5
6
7
MY BELIEVE
8 See Graham rules 1137.xls
Those with computers/smartphone, try one stock
to see if we can have one fulfilling the rules.
THE GRAHAM TECHNIQUE
FROM CH14

 Rules for stock selection:


 Purchase common stocks at less than their
working-capital value (or net current-asset value).
 Give no weight to plant or other fixed assets.
 Deduct all liabilities in full from assets.

Note: according to Graham, using this approach for


fund management, over thirty-odd-year period, have
earned an average of some 20% per year

If market is efficient, it is impossible to find cheap stocks consistently.


9
OUTCOMES
CHECK IF YOU CAN DO/UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING AFTER
CLASS

• The Efficient Market Hypothesis and its tests


• Opposite views
• The performance of professionals

10
8.1 RANDOM WALKS AND EFFICIENT
MARKET HYPOTHESIS
• Random Walk
• Notion that stock price changes are random

• You might want to read A Random Walk Down Wall


Street written by Burton Gordon Malkiel
• significant flaws in both technical analysis and
fundamental analysis?

• Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)


• Prices of securities fully reflect available information

• Think about VW, price drops reflect its consequence


of cheating in pollutant emission
11
• May also try The Superinvestors of Graham-and-
Doddsville" by Warren Buffett, see Buffett1984.pdf
FIGURE 8.1 CUMULATIVE ABNORMAL RETURNS
BEFORE TAKEOVER ATTEMPTS: TARGET
COMPANIES

You may want to look at the


share price of Power Asset
about the merger of
CKI HOLDINGS (01038.HK) and
POWER ASSETS (00006.HK),
around Sept. 8, 2015

12
ABNORMAL RETURN AFTER ANNOUNCEMENT
News from Aastocks website:

<Blue Chip Results>Hang Seng Bank FY Net Profit Up 82%; Total Div. $5.4
2016/02/22 12:24

*HANG SENG BANK FY Net Profit Up 82% to $27.494B; 4th Interim Div. $2.4
2016/02/22 12:08

13
FIGURE 8.2 STOCK PRICE REACTION TO
CNBC REPORTS

14
8.1 RANDOM WALKS AND EFFICIENT
MARKET HYPOTHESIS

• Competition as Source of Efficiency


• Investor competition should imply stock prices
reflect available information
• Investors exploit available profit opportunities
• Competitive advantage can verge on insider
trading

15
8.1 RANDOM WALKS AND EFFICIENT
MARKET HYPOTHESIS
• Versions of EMH

• Weak-form EMH
• Stock prices already reflect all information
contained in history of trading
• Semistrong-form EMH

• Stock prices already reflect all public information

• Strong-form EMH

• Stock prices already reflect all relevant


information, including inside information
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Li 16

Dow Jones insider trading incident


8.2 IMPLICATIONS OF THE EMH
 Technical Analysis
 Research on recurrent/predictable price patterns and
on proxies for buy/sell pressure in market
 May try Technical Analysis Explained by Martin
Pring
 Resistance Level

 Unlikely for stock/index to rise above


 Support Level

 Unlikely for stock/index to fall below

What is the implication?


17
IMPLICATIONS OF THE EMH
 Fundamental Analysis
 Research on determinants of stock value, i.e.
earnings, dividend prospects, future interest
rate expectations and firm risk
Assumes stock price equal to discounted

value of expected future cash flow

What is the implication?

18
IMPLICATIONS OF THE EMH
 Active versus Passive Portfolio Management
 Passive investment strategy
 Buying well-diversified portfolio without attempting

to find mispriced securities


 Index fund
 Mutual fund which holds shares in proportion to
market index representation
 Active management assumes market inefficiency
 Is it correct?

19
8.3 ARE MARKETS EFFICIENT?
 Issues
 Magnitude issue
 Efficiency is relative

 Selection bias issue


 Investors who find successful investment schemes

are less inclined to share findings


 Observable outcomes preselected in favor of failed
attempts
 Lucky event issue
 Lucky investments receive disproportionate
attention
20
8.3 ARE MARKETS EFFICIENT?
 Weak-Form Tests: Patterns in Stock Returns
 Returns over short horizons (3 to 12 months holding
period)
 Momentum effect: Tendency of poorly- or well-

performing stocks to continue abnormal


performance in following periods Evidence of price
momentum.
 Returns over long horizons
 Reversal effect: Tendency of poorly- or well-
performing stocks to experience reversals in
following periods
Note: you may try employing the above findings
in your investment 21

You can refer to the articles mentioned in the text.


8.3 ARE MARKETS EFFICIENT?
 Semistrong Tests: Market Anomalies
 Anomalies
 Patterns of returns contradicting EMH

 P/E effect
 Portfolios of low P/E stocks exhibit higher average

risk-adjusted returns than high P/E stocks

 How risky is it if you are investing in low P/E


stocks?

22
8.3 ARE MARKETS EFFICIENT?
 Semistrong Tests: Market Anomalies
 Small-firm effect
 Stocks of small firms can earn abnormal returns,

primarily in January
 Neglected-firm effect
 Stock of little-known firms can generate abnormal
returns
 Book-to-market effect
 Shares of high book-to-market firms can generate

abnormal returns
 Is it risky
23
FIGURE 8.3 AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURN: TEN
SIZE-BASED PORTFOLIOS, 1926-2010
25
Small-firm effect, NYSE stocks
19.8
20
17.0 16.6
15.9
15.2 15.1
Annual return (%)

14.6
15 13.5
12.9
11.0
10

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Size decile: 1 = small, 10 = large
24
FIGURE 8.4 AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURN AS
FUNCTION OF BOOK-TO-MARKET RATIO,
1926-2010
20

18 17.3
16.1
16 15.5

14 13.4 13.4
Annual return (%)

13.1
11.8 11.7
12 11.7
11.0

10

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
25
Book-to-market decile: 1 = low, 10 = high
8.3 ARE MARKETS EFFICIENT?
 Semistrong Tests: Market Anomalies
 Post-earnings announcement price drift
 Sluggish response of stock price to firm’s earnings

announcement
 Abnormal return on announcement day,
momentum continues

26
FIGURE 8.5 CUMULATIVE ABNORMAL RETURNS
AFTER EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS

Magnitude of
surprise, 10 highest

You may want to


see if the stock price
of Hang Seng Bank
will follow

27
8.4 MUTUAL FUND AND ANALYST
PERFORMANCE
 Stock Market Analysis
 Analysts are overly positive about firm prospects
 Womack: Positive changes in recommendation

associated with 5% increase, negative with 11%


decrease, price impacts seem permanent
 Jegadeesh, Kim, Kristie, and Lee:
Recommendations are associated with price
change, but the level of consensus is inconsistent
predictor of future performance
 Barber, Lehavy, McNichols, and Trueman: Firms
with most-favorable recommendations outperform
firms with least-favorable recommendations 28
8.4 MUTUAL FUND AND ANALYST
PERFORMANCE
 Mutual Fund Managers
 Wermers: Funds show positive gross alphas; negative
net alphas after controlling for fees, risk
 Berk and Green: Skilled managers with abnormal
performance will attract new funds until additional
cost, complexity drives alphas to zero
 Chen, Ferson, and Peters: On average, bond mutual
funds outperform passive bond indexes in gross
returns, underperform once fees subtracted
 See the text in this chapter listing a few investment
superstars (Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, John
29
Templeton, Mario Gabelli, etc.)
FIGURE 8.7 MUTUAL FUND ALPHAS
COMPUTED USING FOUR-FACTOR MODEL,
1993-2007 (BEST AND WORST 2.5% TAKEN OUT)

30
Alpha: slightly negative mean
EXERCISES

Q1-9

31

You might also like