This document outlines four types of arguments: arguments of fact, which establish whether something is true or not; arguments of definition, which determine whether something fits within a category; arguments of value, which connect evidence to a point through justification of importance; and policy arguments, which claim something should or should not be done based on presented facts and interpretation.
This document outlines four types of arguments: arguments of fact, which establish whether something is true or not; arguments of definition, which determine whether something fits within a category; arguments of value, which connect evidence to a point through justification of importance; and policy arguments, which claim something should or should not be done based on presented facts and interpretation.
This document outlines four types of arguments: arguments of fact, which establish whether something is true or not; arguments of definition, which determine whether something fits within a category; arguments of value, which connect evidence to a point through justification of importance; and policy arguments, which claim something should or should not be done based on presented facts and interpretation.
whether something is or is not so. • Facts become arguments when they're controversial in themselves or when they're used to challenge or change people's beliefs. ARGUMENT OF DEFINITION
• Definitions matter. Definitions matter because they
do. • Definition arguments try to establish whether someone or something belongs to a certain category. • Challenge a definition and seek to broaden an existing definition. • It is possible to disagree with dictionary definitions or to regard them merely as starting points for arguments. ARGUMENT OF VALUE • Value in an argument can be a warrant or justification connecting your grounds/evidence to its primary point. • In an argument, assume that the person listening will fill in desired value. • In general, the side that best upholds his or her value premise which was adequately defended wins the argument/debate. POLICY ARGUMENT • A policy argument supports a claim that something should or should not be done. • Such arguments have two main components: a claim and its support. The claim assert what should or should not be done. • Support for the claim presents the facts and interpretation that lead to making that claim.