Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Business
Sales HR Finance
development Operation
RH
Reginal Reginal
AH
BH
DM ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
MCKINSEY’S 7S FRAME WORK:
In order to assist managers with the difficulties in the implementation that are associated
with the change in organization the S model was formulated by the consultation of McKinsey
and the business in the late 1970’s.
The seven elements are distinguished in so called hard S’s and soft S’s. The hard element
(green circles) are easy to identify. They can be found in strategy statements, corporate plans,
organization charts and other documentations. The four soft S’s however, are difficult to
describe since capabilities, value and elements of corporate culture are continuously
developing and changing. They are highly determined by the people at work in the
organization. Therefore it is much more difficult to plan or to influence the characteristics of
the soft elements.
Structure:
Industry desires to be equipped in an exact type of shape that is in general referred to as
organizational constitution
SKILL:-
-> Communication skill.
-> Human skill.
-> Problem solving skill.
STYLE:-
It stands for the different actions taken by the top management during the course of a
given period of time through reporting relationship among the three levels of manager
(Authoritarian).
STRATEGY:-
A company plans actions in response to or expectation of changes in its external
environment. Strategy includes vision, mission, objectives, goals, and major action plans
and policies. AMC follows Growth strategy to analyze past achievements.
SYSTEM:-
It follows personnel business system where they have huge policies, personnel,
equipment, computer facilities to co-ordinate activities.
STAFF:-
The human resource management processes used to develop managers, socialization
processes, ways of shaping basic value of management cadre, ways of introducing young
recruits to the company, ways of helping to manage the careers of employees.
SHARED VALUE:-
->Simplicity and positivity
-> Adaptability
->Experience
-> Recognize and Humility
PORTERS FIVE FORCES MODEL ANALYSIS OF AMC
Bargaining power of buyers/customers:
The bargaining power of individual customers in case of AMC is high. Individual
customers generally buy based on the demos conducted at their residence
Threat of new Entrants:
In the cookware industry there are several factors that discourage new brands from
entering. Growing a brand overnight is impossible
Threat of Substitute:
With increase of substitute products AMC business will always be at stake. There
are several cookware which are looking to enter the market with the same attributes as
AMC to gain superior market share and growth in this industry with reasonable prices.
Competitive Rivalry between the existing players:
There are very few players in the cookware industry which provide intense
competition in market, there are few smaller players too but they do not pose a major
competitive threat.
Bargaining power of Suppliers:
The bargaining power of supplier of AMC is weak. It is so because the number of
suppliers is high and the switching costs for AMC is low.
SWOT Analysis of AMC
Strengths:- Opportunities:-
Present in India over 23 year It Empowers women
Unique products Provides employment
Huge customer consultant base: Brand enhancement
Unique business methodology
Weakness: - Threats
Perceived to be high Change in customer preference
Not available in retail stores Government regulations
Dependent on demo process Changes in technology
CURRENT RATIO:
It establishes relationship between total current assets and current liabilities.
Year Current liability Current Assets Current Ratio
CURRENT RATIO
1.5
1.45
1.4
current ratio
1.35
1.3
1.25
1.2
1.15
1.1
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
years
NET PROFIT RATIO:
It expresses the relationship between net profits after taxes to sales. Measure of
overall profitability useful to proprietors, as it gives an idea of the efficiency as well as
profitability of the business to a limited extent.
Year Net Profit Net Sales Net Profit Ratio
(%)
2015-16 0.39
120.92 302.76
2016-17 0.51
137.75 270.84
2017-2018 137.75 270.84 0.51
Table for NET
Net Profit Ratio
Net Profit Ratio
0.51 0.51
0.39
net profit ratio