You are on page 1of 16

Epidemiological Approach

Prepared by I Gede Purnawinadi, S.Kep., Ns., M.Kes., CWCCA.


Epidemiological approach to a health problem
DESCRIPTIVE STAGE Define What is the problem?

Quantify How many are affected?

Describe Who is affected, Where and When


does the problem occur?
DETERMINANTS
ANALYTICAL STAGE Analyze But Why? How?

Identify causing factor(s) What are the possible causes?

INTERVENTION Design intervention So what? Which intervention(s)?


STAGE
Implement and evaluate Did it help?
intervention
Teori Gordon
DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH
M. Roemer, 1993
CHARACTERISTIC SOCIAL
PHYSICAL OF INDIVIDU: ENVIRONMENT:
ENVIRONMENT: Age, Sex, immunity, Education, Occupation,
Geography, Climate, Genetic, Income, Relationships,
Housing, Food, Background, Urbanization, etc.
Water, etc. Habit, etc.

HEALTH
STATUS:
Physical, Mental,
and Social
Well being

HEALTH SERVICES:
Promotion, Prevention, Protection,
Treatment, Rehabilitation, etc.
DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH
Janelle Nichols
DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH
(HL. Blum, 1981)

Heredity

Health Medical
Environment Status Service

Life Style
Basic Epidemiology: Evaluating Quality of Evidence
• Association vs. causality: criteria for causality
• Epidemiological studies provide evidence for an association between
an exposure and an outcome.
• In 1965 Sir Austin Bradford Hill composed a list of criteria to help
evaluate whether an observed association between an exposure and
an outcome is likely to be causal. These are now commonly known as
the Bradford Hill criteria. Although none of the criteria alone can
prove that a relationship is causal, used together, they can help make
an overall judgement about whether a causal relationship is likely.
The Bradford Hill criteria
Types of studies are used in epidemiology
Association vs. Causality
• When interpreting findings from an epidemiological study it is
essential to also consider whether an observed association between
an exposure and an outcome is causal. To do this, we should explore
whether there are other potential explanations for the association.
• These explanations can include:
random error (chance)
systematic error in the way in which the study was conducted (bias)
confounding
Ratio Measures

You might also like