Broom Manufacture Machine START

PRODUCT DEPARTMENT
MEC531

•DANISH AIMAN BIN ZULKIFLI (LEADER) (2016218526)

•MUHAMMAD ASYRAF BIN KAMIL HAMZAH (2016218292)

•MUHAMMAD HAZIQ BIN MOHD PAZLI (2016229324)

•AHMAD HAZIQ DANIAL BIN YUSAINI (2016218526)

•MUHAMMAD IMRAN BIN HASHIM (2016218382)

 PHASE I :
–01  ORGANISATION CHART
 PROJECT MANAGEMNET PLAN
 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT &
SELECTION

PHASE II :

Table of –02  PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

 ANALYSIS OF SYSTEM
content  ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL
COMPONENT
 SIMULATION

–03 ENGINEERING BLUEPRINT

COST REPORT:
–04  FINAL PDS
PHASE I
ORGANIZATION
CHART
 M9A PALM LEAF
SCRATCHER
TUAN HAJI IR
RAZALI HASSAN
SUPERVISOR

ASLAM HUSAINI
BIN AZMAN
CEO

MOHAMMAD MUHAMMAD AHMAD AKIF DANISH AIMAN

NUR FITRI FAIZ SHAH ZULKIFLI
FEEDER D.L SCRATCHER D.L SEPARATOR D.L PRODUCT D.L
 PRODUCT
DEPARTMENT

DANISH AIMAN BIN

ZULKIFLI
-DEPARTMENT LEADER-

MUHAMMAD
AHMAD HAZIQ MUHAMMAD MUHAMMAD
ASYRAF BIN
DANIAL BIN HAZIQ BIN IMRAN BIN
KAMIL
YUSAINI MOHD PAZLI HASHIM
HAMZAH
INTRODUCTION
 INTRODUCTION

A broom is a cleaning tool consisting of usually stiff attached to, and roughly parallel to, a
cylindrical handle, the broomstick. In the year 1797 the broom was made out of branches held together by
some rope attached to a bigger branch which was used as the handle. This broom concept is called
the Besom broom. Dickenson subsequently invented a machine that would make better brooms, and
faster. In 1810, the foot treadle broom machine was invented to fasten the sorghum onto the shaft. A hole
was made in one end of the stick and then the sorghum was tied down with a rope and held together by a
wooden nail that was inserted into the hole in the shaft.

The American United Society of Believers invented the flat and plain shovel like shape of the broom.
They were also the first to use metal wire in the broom production. In the beginning of the nineteenth
century machine usage has been introduced in the broom making business. To the middle of the twentieth
century brooms were made out of biodegradable nature friendly materials: cylindrical wooden handle and
a stack like broom head tied together with thin branches of heather, sorghum, birch and similar plants.
Today the brooms are made with the assistance of electrical machines but it is still a hand crafted
production as is the case also with factories. We integrated these concept into our design project.
 PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
 PROJECT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
 PROBLEM
IDENTIFICATION
 Benchmarking
H type frame hydraulic press
machine
Material 304 Stainless steel

Binding hydraulic press

power(w) 3kw

power source electrical

volatage 380V/220V

Dimension 910x650x1560mm

Weight 1-6 T

Price RM 8,394.74

Pros Cons
easy to handle need labour work

increase labour cost

heavy machine
Semi automatic corn broom machines
machine to make broom

Material 304stainless steel

Power 500w

voltage 380VAC/220VAC

Production Capacity 500 Pieces/12 Hours

Weight: 185KG

Dimension 1250*1050*1250mm

binding winding

Price RM 10,592.11

Pros Cons
Semi-Automatic process expensive

decreases the labour cost

Improves the production

efficiency:
Automatic High Speed Double Axis Tufting
broom Machinery

Material 304 Stainless steel

power 0.55kw

volatage 220-380V

binding injection

Dimension 1300*1200*1700mm

Weight 450kg

price 20,592.11

Pros Cons
high productivity high maintainance
PROBLEM
STATEMENT
1. How to figure out process and mechanism use in
producing improved quality of the broom.
2. How to analyse force that occur during the machining.
3. How to utilize a machine that can hold a product
component without using human work.
4. how to select a suitable material and dimension to be
implemented into the machine.
OBJECTIVES

1. To know what type of mechanism use to bind the skewer

2. To analyse the power, force and torque use to run the
machine.
3. To design a machine based on engineering designing
process.
4. To calculate the force by applying related formulas.
5. to evaluate the properties of material and dimension
used.
PRODUCT DESIGN
SPECIFICATION
Requirements Criteria Justification
WEIGHT

SIZE 80cm x 53cm x 195cm  It is believed to be ergonomics for efficient

working condition
TIME SCALE 10 weeks from initial phase to
detail design

COST
MATERIAL Music wire, stainless steel  Suitable and reliable material

TOOLS/ Hydraulic press  Most efficient method out of our ideas

TECHNOLOGY USED
MAX FORCE EXERTED 1 ton  The required force needed
SAFETY  Secure fittings  Precautions to avoid accidents
 Emergency stop button  Minimizes the risk of lethal injuries.
 Smooth surface finish
 Machine Manual provided

COMPETITION Different model of broom which  Brooms made of plastic and

are more appealing produced by
various manufacturers.

MAINTENANCE Springs, lubricant, screws and  Little and light duty maintenance needed.
bolts, welded area
CUSTOMER  Small manufacturers  As a platform for small entrepreneur to start a
 Newcomer entrepreneur business with a low investment
SPRING MATERIAL Music wire  Offers uniform tensile strength
 NOT resist a corrosive environment (shall not be
exposed to a moist/humid atmosphere)
CYLINDERS MATERIAL Stainless steel  Lower Project Costs
SCREW AND BOLT Stainless steel  High Strength
MATERIAL
FRAME MATERIAL Stainless steel

SPRING STIFNESS
GENERATING
CONCEPT
Morphological Chart
 FUNCTION OPTIONS

POWER SOURCE ALTERNATING CURRENT (AC) GENERATOR DIRECT GENERATOR (DC)

STICK MATERIAL WOOD IRON PLASTIC

CYLINDER HOLDER MATERIAL IRON ALUMINIUM STEEL

CYLINDER HOLDER SHAPE

CIRCLE SQUARE TRIANGLE

STICK HOLDER TYPE

CLAW SPINDLE G- CLAMP

BEARING

DEEP BALL BEARING ANGULAR CONTACT BALL SPHERICAL ROLLER

SPRING TYPE

COMPRESSION SPRING GERMAN HOOKS CONICAL SPRING

 CONCEPT
EVALUATION
 Pugh Chart (Mechanism)
A B C

Mechanism

Function 2 0 3
Maintenance 1 2 3
Assemble 1 1 3
Cost 3 2 2
Size 3 2 1
Energy 3 3 3
consumption
Aestetic 3 1 3
Total 16 11 18
 Pugh Chart (Design)
A B C

Design

Function 2 1 3
Ergonomic 3 2 3
Aestetic 2 0 3
Cost 1 3 1
Durability 1 1 3
Size 1 3 2
Weight 2 3 2
Number of broom 2 1 3
produce per day

Energy 1 3 2
consumption
Handling 1 3 3
Total 16 20 25
PHASE II
 PRODUCT
ACHITECTURE
ANALYSIS OF
SYSTEM
PIPE ANALYSIS
HYDRAULIC PRESS ANALYSIS
SPRING ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS OF
MECHANICAL
COMPONENT
Stress Analysis of PE pipe
Stress Analysis of Spring
SIMULATION
ENGINEERING
BLUEPRINT
 List of components:

 Hydraulic Press Broom  Pipe holder

Machine  Hydraulic
 Exploded view  Lower spring
 Cylinder holder  Upper spring
 Small nut  Upper table
 Small bolt  Lower table
 Large nut  Hydraulic shaft
 Large bolt  Broom stick
 Side frame  Pipe holder
 Top frame  Base frame
Hydraulic Press Broom Machine
Exploded view
Cylinder holder
Small nut
Small bolt
Large nut
Large bolt
Side frame
Top frame
Pipe holder
Hydraullic
Lower spring
Upper spring
Upper table
Lower table
Hydraulic shaft
Broom stick
Pipe
Base frame
COST REPORT
WITH FINAL PDS
 MATERIAL COST
COMPONENT REFERENCE PRICE PER
UNIT TOTAL(RM)
UNIT(RM)
CYLINDER HOLDER 1 9.65 2 19.3
SMALL NUT 2 0.3 4 1.2
SMALL BOLT 3 1.2 4 4.8
LARGE NUT 4 0.5 2 1
LARGE BOLT 5 2 2 4
SIDE FRAME 6 180 2 360
BASE FRAME 7 240 2 480
TOP FRAME 8 320 1 320
PIPE HOLDER 9 11.25 2 22.5
HYDRAULIC 10 400 1 400
LOWER SPRING 11 28 2 56
UPPER SPRING 12 22.12 2 44.24
UPPER TABLE 13 130 1 130
LOWER TABLE 14 290 1 290
HYDRAULIC SHAFT 15 49.54 1 49.54
BROOM STICK(sample) 16 0 0 0
PIPE (sample) 17 0 1 0

2182.58