This document discusses strategies for managing ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following myocardial infarction. It provides statistics on cases of post-infarction VSR from 2013-2018 at the presenting institution. In 2018, 4 out of 8 patients with VSR underwent surgical repair compared to only 8 out of 15 from 2013-2018. The document outlines differences in 2018 including delaying surgery by 7-21 days and optimal preoperative preparation which resulted in only a 10% mortality rate for operated cases, compared to historical rates of 50-84%. Key steps of surgical repair are also summarized.
This document discusses strategies for managing ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following myocardial infarction. It provides statistics on cases of post-infarction VSR from 2013-2018 at the presenting institution. In 2018, 4 out of 8 patients with VSR underwent surgical repair compared to only 8 out of 15 from 2013-2018. The document outlines differences in 2018 including delaying surgery by 7-21 days and optimal preoperative preparation which resulted in only a 10% mortality rate for operated cases, compared to historical rates of 50-84%. Key steps of surgical repair are also summarized.
This document discusses strategies for managing ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following myocardial infarction. It provides statistics on cases of post-infarction VSR from 2013-2018 at the presenting institution. In 2018, 4 out of 8 patients with VSR underwent surgical repair compared to only 8 out of 15 from 2013-2018. The document outlines differences in 2018 including delaying surgery by 7-21 days and optimal preoperative preparation which resulted in only a 10% mortality rate for operated cases, compared to historical rates of 50-84%. Key steps of surgical repair are also summarized.
Ventricular septal rupture Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Anaesthesia and Cardiology Presented by Dr Suraj Pai The Heart Team • Dr Ramsankar P, Dr Sreevatsa K Prasad, Dr Hemachandran M,Dr Durgaprasad Rath ,Dr B V Saichandran • Dr Satyen Parida,Dr Ajay kumar Jha, Dr Sakthirajan,Dr Chitra,Dr Ashok Sankar Badhe Dr Sandheep Misra • Dr Ajith A,Dr Avinash,Dr Santhosh Satheesh,Dr Raja Selvaraj • Dr Kulkarni,Dr Abhishek Dr Basu • The Perfusion team ,Nursing team, and the department of Transfusion medicine • Senior Residents of CTVS, Cardiology,Anaestheisa and Bloodbank Surgical repair of Post AMI VSR • Outline of the problem • History of Surgical repair • Our Statistics 2013 to 2018 • Patient characteristics • What we did differently in 2018 • Optimal preoperative preparation • Essential steps in surgical repair • Conclusion and message Outline of the Problem • Universal scenario (rare,rarer after early intervention for ACS, 1 surgeon operates 1 case per year Mortality varies (mean 50%,range 12-84%) • Indian scenario • 2003 aggressive management suggested • 2018 delayed surgery by 7 days to 21 days yields as low as 10% mortality Indian Scenario
In unoperated cases, early death is common;
50% die in <7 days, 70% within 2 weeks, and 80%-90% die within 4 weeks[ History of Surgical repair Our Statistics • 2013-2018 (N=15) – 8 Patients, 4 male ,4 Female operated 2 Survived but lost on followup after 6 months – 7 patients either refused surgery or went elsewhere • 2018 (N=8) – 4 were operated 2 male 2 female followup from 3 weeks to 10 months – 4 did not come to surgery(2 mortality, 2 refused) Patient characteristics at presentation • Sex • Age • Presentation(Shock,Pul edema,Acs,) • Duration between MI and VSR • Intervention (Primary PTCA/Thrombectomy/Thrombolysis) • Euroscore 2(at presentation/ at surgery) Cardiology data(Table • ECG-(Type of MI, ) • ECHO LVEF,RWMA,MR,TR, Pericardial effusion • Site and size of VSR, Shunt L to right >2:1 • Coronary angiogram findings Patient characteristics 2013-18 Ag S Typ An Typ MI VSR to Eurosc Thro Natu Status of e e e of gio e of to surger ore 2 mbol re of patient on x MI VSR VSR y DAYS mortali ysis/ Surg table days ty risk PCI/ ery
62 M AW 3 A 12 13 47.5 PCI S Inotropes
CPR 60 M AW 1 A 7 78 2.83 No EL Stable 65 M IW 2 B 2 1 28.9 STK S Inotropes Intubated 50 F IW 2 B 11 1 19 No U Stable, crashed 66 F AW 1 A 7 1 13.6 No U stable 60 F AW 1 A 4 5 5.63 No E Stable 70 F AW 2 A NA 2 29.8 No S CPR 52 M AW 1 A 2 2 12.43 no E Intubated Patient characteristics 2013-18 Ag Se mort Nature Characte e x ality of ristic of risk Surgery VSR 62 M 47.5 Sa Apical, friable 60 M 2.83 EL Apical, good rim 65 M 28.9 Sa Mid basal, friable 50 F 19 U Posterior basal multiple 66 F 13.6 U Apical, friable 60 F 5.63 EM Apical, friable 70 F 29.8 Sa Apical, friable Patient characteristics 2018 Patients who did not have Patients who went for surgery surgery Age Sex MI- TYPE STAT EUR Age Sex MI- TYP STA EU VSR OF US OSC VSR E TUS RO TIME VSR ORE TIM OF SC 2 E VSR OR E2 The Change Timing Critical Type of Type of CPB Cross Post Outco Follow of status VSR Repair time clamp operati me up surgery time ve status