Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Objectives
1. Identify three benefits to providing integrating care and
services for people with co-occurring conditions
• Background
• Challenges
• Goals
• Barriers
• Solutions
3
Intellectual Disability Diagnostic
Criteria
• Intellectual functioning level (IQ) is 70 or below
• Concurrent deficits in adaptive functioning in two or more of the following
areas:
– Communication
– Self care
– Home living
– Social interpersonal skills
– Use of community resources
– Self direction
– Functional academic skills
– Work
– Leisure
– Health
– Self
• The condition is present from childhood (prior to age 18)
4
Degree of Intellectual Impairment
• Mild ID IQ 55 to 70
• Moderate ID IQ 35 to 55
• Severe ID IQ 20 to 35
• Profound ID IQ below 20
5
Mental Illness in People with
Intellectual Disabilities
• Mental Illness: disorders of the brain that
disrupt a person’s thinking, feeling, mood, and
ability to relate to others.
• Some of the most common types of mental
illnesses seen in people with developmental
disabilities include major depression, bipolar
disorder, anxiety disorders, personality
disorders, schizophrenia and other psychotic
disorders, and phobias
6
Co-Occurring Conditions
CD MH
ID
7
ID and MI Contrasts
Intellectual Disabilities Mental Illness
1. Refers to below average 1. Not related to IQ
intellectual functioning
9
Myth Buster
10
Mental Health Conditions
• Associated with Childhood
– Learning Disorders
– Pervasive Developmental Disorders
– Attention Deficit
– Tic Disorders
• Associated with Adulthood
– Psychotic Disorders
– Mood Disorders
– Anxiety Disorders
11
Mental Health Conditions (con’t)
• Associated with older adults
– Delirium
– Dementia
• Others
– Substance Use Disorders
– Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders
– Personality Disorders
12
National Core Indicators Project
• NCI analysis based upon:
– Large random sample
– Cross-state data (17 states)
– Respondents in community and institutional
settings
– Data obtained from consumers and proxies on
physical and behavioral health, services and
supports, community outcomes
13
Type of Diagnosis (n=8501)
ID only Dual dx
n=2,453
29%
n=6,048
71%
14
Level of [ID] (n=8501)
Dual dx ID only
8.8
profound 18.4
13.6
severe 17.9
27.8
moderate 27.8
49.8
mild 35.8
0 20 40 60 80 100
15
Takes Psychotropic Medications
ID only Dual dx
23%
77%
16
Type of Psychotropic Taken
ID only Dual dx
30
27
25
25 24
23
20
% YES
16 17
15 13
12
11
9
10 8
6
5 4 4
0
mood only anxiety only behavior only mood + anxiety mood + behavior anxiety + All of them
behavior
17
Presence of Problem Behavior
MR only Dual dx
100
80
52.8
% yes
60 47.1
40 27.6 26.6 24.4
15.9
20
0
Self-injury Disruptive Uncooperative
(n=1534) behavior behavior
(n=2839) (n=2465)
18
Individuals with Dual Diagnosis
• May sometimes be seen as adults with failed
employment histories who reside in homeless
shelters and/or within the criminal justice system
• Have complex needs and are often unable to
access the services they need due to insufficient
resources
• Persons with dual diagnosis face difficulties
finding appropriate services; often get caught in-
between two service systems
19
Potential Consequences for the Person
• Homelessness
• Overmedication
• Incarceration
• Hospitalization
• Restrictive services
• “Falling between the
cracks”
• Harmful care
20
Commonly Undiagnosed Problems
– Seizure disorders (untreated or
undertreated)
– Chronic pain
– Gastro esophageal reflux disease
– Autoimmune disorders
– Sleep apnea
21
Barriers and Challenges in
Collaboration
• Funding barriers to integrated treatment
• Lack of communication
• Training in integrated approaches (both sides)
• Philosophic differences
22
Philosophical Differences
Intellectual Disabilities System Mental Health System
Habilitation Rehabilitation
Self-Determination Recovery
23
Behavioral Topography
• Although the topography (what the behavior
looks like or sounds like) of behavior may be
similar for individuals, the causes and
functions of behaviors are very different.
24
Integrating Approaches
• Foundations of behavior analysis assert that behavior is lawful and rational to the individual
1
• Mental illness often makes these relations difficult to ascertain, as private events are a part of the
internal logic and play a critical role in the establishment of patterns.
2
• Private events related to the mental illness may crate patterns of behavior reinforced by escape or
the opportunity to obtain certain events, people, or activities
3
• Understanding that these behaviors serve a function for the individual, no matter how difficult it is
to understand, provides a method for linking services for individuals utilizing the best of both
4 psychiatric and behavioral intervention
• Combining information related to psychiatric symptoms into a behavioral model also eliminates the
frequently asked dichotomous question, “is it behavior or is it mental illness?”
5
• The most accurate answer to this question is often “both” and without an understanding of how the
two interact, a real understanding of the question is impossible
6
25
Mental Health Overlay on Individuals
with Intellectual Deficits
• Mental Health conditions are often underdiagnosed in
this population for a number of reasons (Gustafsson &
Sonnander, 2004; Reiss, 1990):
– Some disorders may manifest differently (i.e., different
symptoms may be evident) across a range of intellectual
ability (Powell, 1999)
– Diagnostic Overshadowing: Challenging or disruptive
behaviors may be attributed to the intellectual disability
instead of a potential mental illness (Moss, 2001);
cognitive inefficiencies, slowed processing and/or poor
executive functioning attributed to intellectual disability
– Many diagnostic tools rely on individuals’ ability to express
their symptoms verbally (Moss, 2001).
Challenging ID/MI Assumptions
• Individuals with ID can benefit from MH services
• If a client has a diagnosis that qualifies for mental
health services, the presence of any other diagnosis,
including intellectual disability, does not exclude that
individual from receiving mental health services, and
visa versa
– Eliminate language like “primary diagnosis” and criteria to
receive services that relies on a “which [deficit] came
first?” model
• Coordinated treatment and support should be the
standard for individuals with more than one disability
who are served in state funded programs
Implications/Recommendations for
Individuals with ID/MI
• Assessment and proper diagnosis of psychiatric
disorders is key to creating and coordinating a
plan for treatment
• The plan of treatment should incorporate
interventions for both MI and ID components
– Support providers should note that behavior initially
maintained by physical influences can become
maintained by social attention or release from
demands as well
• Pay attention to stages of change for the
individual and the providers when creating a plan
of treatment
How does knowing me help
them?
• Human service delivery happens between
humans
• All the same issues that occur in social
engagement will be at play in our interactions
with those we support
Using what we’ve got:
Knowing the tools in our toolbox
• Communication: What are we telling the person?
– Verbal
– Non-verbal
• Communication
• Communication
• More Communication
Activity: Making our tools work
• Split up into pairs in the room
Person’s
Mental attainment Community
Health Care of the life
s/he wants
Integrated Care
• A Person Centered approach
– Balance of “Important to” and “Important for”
• De-emphasizes any one tool as the most
important tool or the tool that will fix everything
• Integrates information from many angles/sources
– Multiple/Competing conditions: Neurocognitive,
Mental Health, Substance Use, Medical, etc.
• Gets the right supports at the right time to the
person
Next Steps:
How can we build Integrated Care settings?