Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Piyush Verma
Dept of Paedodontics & Preventive Dentistry
Contents
Introduction
Goals of isolation
Advantage of isolation
Methods of isolation
Direct methods
Indirect methods
• Conclusion
Introduction
good accessibility and visibility
, adequate room for instrumentation
X ray shows a bur at the level of L4 Vertebra in left lumbar region in a 4 yrs
child, aspirated during access cavity preparation of 55 with an airoter hand
piece
Case 2
X ray shows a finishing bur at the level of L5 vertebra in left lumbar region in a
6 yrs old male child, aspirated while finishing restoration in his decayed 64, 65
Case 3
X ray shows an airoter cap at the level of L5 vertebra in left lumbar region
Disadvantages of rubber dam
Winged
Frequently used clamps
used in pediatric
dentistry :
2Aclamp
14 clamp
14Aclamp
Clamps for front
teeth
Ivory # 6 Ivory # 9
Ivory # 15
Ivory # 90N Ivory # 212S
Dental floss
After selecting the appropriate
clamp place a 12 inch piece of
dental floss on the bow of the
clamp to aid in retrieval of the
clamp if it is dislodged from
the tooth and falls into the
posterior pharyngeal area
Rubber dam clamp forceps
Nygard-Ostby frame
U-shaped frame made of plastic
Because of its shape, exerts less
tension on the dam
Easier to use
Requires no absorbent
napkin, when taking
radiographs
Stands away from face
Metal frame :
Young frame
U-shaped metal frame with
small metal projections for
securing borders of the
rubber dam.
Modifications
Le Cadre Articule rubber
dam frame (articulated
frame)
Finger tip is introduced in the dam opening to better illustrate the patient
the functions of this rubber sheet
Assistant’s hands position the dam directly around the tooth to be
treated
The dentist positions the clamp
With assistance dentist positions Young’s frame
Disadvantages
Procedure is often difficult
Especially in posterior areas or particularly small
mouths
Clamp first
• Inspection –
Inspect the clamp for wear, distortion or damage
Discard if distorted
Care –
Do not bend or distort the clamp
Type 4 reaction
Contact dermatitis
Thought to be caused by chemicals
added to the latex during
processing
Reactions take up 2 days to develop
Symptoms : swelling & redness of
skin, cracked, itchy & dry skin
Type 1reactions :
Precaution:
Moisten the cotton rolls & cellulose wafers while
removing to prevent inadvertent removal of
epithelium from cheeks, floor of mouth or lips
Gauze piece or throat
shields
Advantage –
Better tolerated by delicate tissues
Less adherence to dry tissues compared to cotton
Dri – angle
A thin, absorbent, cellulose triangle
Unique replacement on the cotton roll in
the parotid area
Covers the parotid or Stensen's duct and
effectively restricts the flow of saliva
Provides the required Dri-Field for
Composites
Bonding
Cementing
Saliva ejectorprevent
pooling of saliva in the floor Saliva ejector
of the mouth
Precautions
Should be disinfected after each use
Child patient- cautioned not to close his mouth
Retraction
Used for isolation
cords & retraction in direct
procedures of treatment of accessible
sub gingival area
Types –
Block
Ratchet
Block type Ratchet type
Ideal characteristics -
Should be adaptable to all mouths
Should be easily positioned & removed with no patient
discomfort
Should be stable once applied
Should be either sterilizable or disposable
Mouth
mirror
Secondary function -- Helps to retract cheeks,
lip & tongue in the absence of rubber dam
Indirect methods :
Local anaesthesia
Drugs –
Anti sialogogues (Atropine)
Anti anxiety ( Diazepam)
Conclusion
A thorough knowledge of the preliminary procedures
reduces the physical strain on the dental team
associated with the daily dental treatment, reduces
patient’s anxiety associated with dental procedures &
enhance moisture control thereby improving the
quality of operative dentistry
References
Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry
Grossman’s Endodontic practice
Shobha tandon. Textbook of Peadodontics
MS Muthu. Pediatic Dentistry, Principles & Practice
Vimal K Sikri. Textbook of operative dentistry
Raggio DP et al. Latex allergy in dentistry: clinical cases
report. J Clin Exp Dent. 2010;2(1):55-9
Panse E et al. Accidental ingestion of instruments in
Pediatric dental patients : Report of 3 cases. JADA
2012;1(2): 79-81