This study evaluated outcomes of a selective management approach for penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) using a "no zone" strategy. Patients either underwent immediate neck exploration for hard signs of injury or were selectively investigated based on soft signs. The unstable patients with hard signs had a 10-27% negative exploration rate. Stable symptomatic patients with soft signs could be selectively investigated. Asymptomatic patients could be safely observed with a very low risk of missed injuries. The selective "no zone" approach provided safe management of PNIs with low complications. Further research is needed to compare this approach to zone-based strategies and evaluate the role of endovascular treatment.
This study evaluated outcomes of a selective management approach for penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) using a "no zone" strategy. Patients either underwent immediate neck exploration for hard signs of injury or were selectively investigated based on soft signs. The unstable patients with hard signs had a 10-27% negative exploration rate. Stable symptomatic patients with soft signs could be selectively investigated. Asymptomatic patients could be safely observed with a very low risk of missed injuries. The selective "no zone" approach provided safe management of PNIs with low complications. Further research is needed to compare this approach to zone-based strategies and evaluate the role of endovascular treatment.
This study evaluated outcomes of a selective management approach for penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) using a "no zone" strategy. Patients either underwent immediate neck exploration for hard signs of injury or were selectively investigated based on soft signs. The unstable patients with hard signs had a 10-27% negative exploration rate. Stable symptomatic patients with soft signs could be selectively investigated. Asymptomatic patients could be safely observed with a very low risk of missed injuries. The selective "no zone" approach provided safe management of PNIs with low complications. Further research is needed to compare this approach to zone-based strategies and evaluate the role of endovascular treatment.
• The neck is an extremely complex anatomical region where several vital structures.
• Although zones of neck injury can provide a useful
guideline in the management of PNIs, there are some disadvantages. • Selective management has been the standard management protocol in PNI since this approach has significantly reduced unnecessary neck exploration
• The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of
selective management in PNIs using the ‘‘no zone’’ approach A retrospective study was performed in patients treated for PNIs at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) from January 2003 to December 2013.
The patients with hard signs of neck injury underwent
emergency neck exploration. The asymptomatic patients and the patients with soft signs (other symptoms) were considered to be candidates for selective management.
Data collection included demographic data,
emergency department parameters, details of neck injury, and outcomes in terms of mortality, negative exploration rate, and missed injury rate Figure 1. Management of Penetrating Neck Injuries And The Details Of The Signs Of Neck Injury Table 1. Demographic Data And Emergency Department (ED) Parameters. Table 2. The Zones of neck injury Fig. 2. A 35 Year-old Male With A Stab Wound To The Left Neck Zone II Underwent Neck Exploration Due To Active Haemorrhage.
Asterisk (*) Indicates The
Orientation Of The Patient Head To The Right. The Bleeding From The Left Vertebral Artery Through The Transverse Processes Of The Spine Was Controlled By An Application Of Bone Wax (White Arrow). The Hypopharyngeal Injury Was Also Identified And Repaired With Polydioxanone 3–0 Suturing (Black Arrow). Fig. 3. An Angiography Was Performed As An Adjunct Treatment Of The Left Vertebral Artery Injury In The Patient In Fig. 2.
A. A false aneurysm of the
left vertebral artery was identified (black arrow). B. B. Coil embolization of the left vertebral artery was performed (white arrow). The patient recovered uneventfully without neurological deficit Table 3. Outcomes of penetrating neck injury patients The management of PNIs has shifted from mandatory neck exploration to selective management.
Early experiences of selective management
of PNIs have come from the use of ‘‘zone- based’’ algorithms Nevertheless, there are problems associated with the zone-based approach.
Furthermore, patients with multiple or
transcervical injuries occasionally cannot be grouped into one zone, as seen in 6% of patients in the present study. It is clear that immediate neck exploration is warranted in unstable patients with ‘‘hard signs’’ of neck injury after optimal airway has been obtained
The negative exploration rates of the PNI
patients with hard signs ranges from 10 to 27%, which are higher compared to the present study • In stable but symptomatic patients (the soft sign group), the selective use of investigation to diagnose internal organ injuries seems to be a better approach
• As newer imaging modalities emerge, CTA has
become widely used as an initial screening tool in stable PNI patients • Surgically, the zones of neck injury help surgeons prepare and select the appropriate incisions
• Moreover, difficult vascular control should be
anticipated in zone III injuries, thus angiography and endovascular treatment could be useful Firstly, the present study is a retrospective descriptive study performed in a low volume centre with a high incidence of stab wounds to test our management algorithm
Secondly, the use of selective investigations in the
soft sign group was not uniform during the study period since there was no clear protocol and the routine use of CTA was started in 2006 the selective management of PNIs using ‘‘no zone’’ approach is a safe and simple strategy
The unstable patients with hard signs should
undergo immediate neck exploration
Stable symptomatic (soft signs) patients can
be selectively investigated Asymptomatic patients can be simply observed with very low risk of missed injuries.
Further prospective studies are required
to compare the outcomes between ‘‘no zone’’ and ‘‘zone-based’’ approaches, and to identify the role of endovascular treatment in PNIs. 24