Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACTG 6580
Chapter 13 -
REVENUE RECOGNITION
(IAS18)
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.2
Executive summary
► General:
► Under both IFRS and US GAAP, revenue is not recognized until it is both realized
(realizable) and earned.
► The preponderance of the accounting guidance on revenue recognition for IFRS is
contained in IAS 18 and IAS 11. Under US GAAP, there is a large volume of
guidance on revenue recognition, including numerous industry standards. Although
IAS 18 and IAS 11 contain the IFRS general guidance for revenue recognition,
there is a lack of specific guidance in relation to industry-specific issues and
multiple-element arrangements.
► Revenue recognition at the time of sale: under IFRS, there is no specific requirement
that persuasive evidence of a sale must exist before revenue is recognized as there is
under US GAAP.
► Revenue recognition at the time of service: IFRS allows the use of the percentage-of-
completion model for service contracts. This model is prohibited for service contracts
under US GAAP.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.3
Executive summary
► Departures from recognition at the time of sale (sales with right of
return): IFRS generally allows revenue recognition at the time of sale
as long as the seller can reliably estimate the amount of future
returns.
► US GAAP, in addition to the requirement to be able to reasonably
estimate returns, has more detailed guidance. This guidance
includes, among other conditions, that the buyer’s payment is not
contingent on the buyer reselling the product and that the buyer has
economic substance apart from the seller.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.4
Executive summary
► Accounting for multiple elements:
► IFRS does not include specific guidance for determining when a contract should
be separated into multiple units of accounting. US GAAP does provide detailed
guidance. IFRS specifies that the allocation of revenue be based on relative fair
values, whereas US GAAP specifies that the allocation be done on relative
selling price.
► IFRS may allow contingent consideration to be included when allocating total
revenue to the components of a transaction. However, when such
circumstances are encountered, it should be viewed with a great deal of
skepticism, with a thorough review of the facts and circumstances in order to
reach an appropriate conclusion.
► Under US GAAP, contingent consideration is not recognized until the contingency
is resolved.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.5
Progress on convergence
• The Boards are currently conducting a joint project to develop concepts for revenue
recognition and a standard based on those concepts.
• The Boards issued an Exposure Draft (ED), Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, in June 2010 that describes a model to determine the appropriate
amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue recognition consisting of the following
steps:
1) Identify the contracts(s) with the customer
2) Identify the separate performance obligations in the contract
3) Determine the transaction price
4) Allocate the transaction price to the separate performance obligations
5) Recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied.
► 986 ED public comments were received by October 22, 2010. In June 2011, the Boards
decided to issue a new ED for public comment because they made significant changes
to the proposal during re-deliberations. The new ED is expected to be issued by the end
of September, 2011, with a 120 day comment period.
► The industries most likely to be impacted by the proposed guidance are software,
entertainment, telecommunications, real estate, retail (depending on right of return) and
construction.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.6
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.7
Measurement of Revenue
IAS18 states that revenue should be measured "at the fair
value of the consideration received or receivable".
• If the consideration for a sale transaction takes the form
of cash, the amount of revenue is generally equal to the
amount of cash receivable, net of any trade discounts.
• If goods are sold or services rendered in return for other
goods or services, the amount of revenue is the fair
value of the goods or services received.
• If the consideration for a sale is not receivable until
some time after the date of the sale transaction, the fair
value of the consideration is determined by discounting
future receipts to their present value.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.8
US GAAP IFRS
Revenue is not recognized until it is both
realized (or realizable) and earned. Similar
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.9
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.10
US GAAP IFRS
Four revenue recognition criteria:
Four revenue recognition 1. The entity has transferred to the buyer the
criteria: significant risks and rewards of ownership of
the goods.
1. Delivery has occurred.
2. The entity does not retain continuing
2. Persuasive evidence of an managerial involvement to the degree usually
arrangement exists. associated with ownership or effective control
3. The seller’s price to the over the goods sold.
buyer is fixed or 3. The amount of revenue and the costs
determinable. associated with the transaction can be
4. Collectibility is reasonably measured reliably.
assured. 4. It is probable that the economic benefits
associated with the transaction will flow to the
entity.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.11
US GAAP IFRS
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.12
US GAAP IFRS
► Costs with respect to service ► Costs with respect to service
contracts are expensed as contracts may be expensed as
incurred. The percentage-of- incurred depending on a
completion model is prohibited company’s policy for
by US GAAP under ASC 605- recognizing revenue for
35. service contracts, but they
could be deferred if the
company is using the
percentage-of-completion
method.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.13
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.14
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.15
March June
31, 30, Sept. Dec. 31, March June 30,
2010 2010 30, 2010 2010 31, 2011 2011
Costs
$7,200 $28,800 $50,400 $ 36,000 $ 14,400 $ 7,200
incurred
Cumulative
costs $7,200 $36,000 $86,400 $122,400 $136,800 $144,000
incurred
Cumulative
percentage 5% 25% 60% 85% 95% 100%
complete
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.16
Using US GAAP:
► Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met for the year ended
December 31, 2010, how much will Advisco record as revenue related to its
arrangement with Temple (SAB 104)?
► Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, how much revenue
should Advisco record through the end of the project in 2011?
Using IFRS:
► Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met for the year ended
December 31, 2010, how much will Advisco record as revenue related to its
arrangement with Temple?
► Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, how much revenue
should Advisco record through the end of the project in 2011?
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.17
US GAAP:
Under US GAAP (as stated by the SEC staff in SAB 104), service revenue should be
recognized on a straight-line basis, unless evidence suggests that revenue is earned
or obligations are fulfilled in a different pattern. Consistent with this view, since
Advisco is not able to determine a pattern of performance (other than by applying a
percentage-of-completion model, which is prohibited by US GAAP for service
contracts), revenue should be recognized on a straight-line basis over the service
period.
► Advisco should record revenue of $60,000 ($180,000 x 6 months /18 months) or the
remaining portion of the contracted amount.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.18
IFRS:
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.19
US GAAP IFRS
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.22
US GAAP IFRS
Focuses on the need to reliably
estimate future returns before revenue
can be recorded for sales with a right of
return. Similar. IAS 18 allows revenue
recognition at the time of the sale as
ASC 605-15-25-1 includes the ability of long as the seller can reliably estimate
the seller to be able to reasonably the amount of future returns.
estimate future returns as one of the six
criteria for revenue recognition.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.23
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.24
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.25
US GAAP IFRS
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.28
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.29
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.30
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.31
US GAAP IFRS
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.32
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.33
US GAAP IFRS
► The total revenue is ► The total revenues are allocated to the components
allocated to the units based on their relative fair value. IAS 18.7 contains the
of account based on following definition: “Fair value is the amount for which
their relative selling an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled,
prices. The best between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s
evidence of selling length transaction.”
price is VSOE. If
► IFRS does not specify the method to determine fair
VSOE does not exist,
value. However, IFRIC 13 provides guidance for
then third-party
measuring fair value for award credits that are being
evidence of selling
utilized in practice for multiple elements allocation,
price should be used.
such as: (a) costs plus a reasonable profit margin,
If neither of these
(b) third-party evidence and (c) VSOE (essentially
exist, then the entity
the price for which the vendor has sold the goods on
should use the best
a stand-alone basis). From a practical standpoint,
estimate of selling
the use of these factors achieves the same results
price. as under US GAAP.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.34
US GAAP IFRS
► ASC 605-25-30-5 restricts the amount ► Contingent amounts may be included
of revenue recognized, with respect to when allocating total revenues to the
any component, to the amount that is components of the transaction.
not contingent on the delivery of However, IAS 18.18 indicates that
additional items or other specific revenue is recognized only if it is
performance criteria. Contingent probable that economic benefits of a
consideration is not recognized until the transaction will flow to an entity and, in
contingency is resolved. some cases, it may not be probable
until an uncertainty is resolved.
Therefore, when circumstances are
encountered where contingent
consideration is being allowed, it should
be viewed with a great deal of
skepticism and a thorough review of the
facts and circumstances should be
made in order to reach an appropriate
conclusion.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.35
Example 4 (continued):
The packaging machine was installed at Wings and operational on June 30, 2010, at
which time the training services commenced. The training sessions are held weekly at
Wings for the entire 18-month period. In addition, per the contract, the maintenance
service period starts upon the completion of the installation (i.e., June 30, 2010).
Management of Robots wants to report as much revenue as possible on the contract with
Wings in 2010 so they earn their bonuses.
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.37
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.38
IFRS:
The solution under IFRS is the same as for US GAAP. However, it should be noted that
the standards under US GAAP are explicit and structured for determining allocation of
multiple elements, while there is very limited guidance under IFRS. Likewise, IFRS does
not provide guidance on how to determine fair value other than some analogous guidance
contained in IFRIC 13, which is being used in practice for multiple element arrangements
overall. The guidance in IFRIC suggests that some measures to determine fair value
include: the amount for which items may be sold separately (selling price), amounts paid to
third parties plus a reasonable profit margin (cost plus profit margin = selling price) or an
estimated amount. This guidance is very similar to US GAAP with the end result being the
same. However, students should be cautioned that a thorough analysis needs to be made
for multiple-element arrangements under IFRS due to a lack of specific guidance, but
generally there are no differences in accounting under either US GAAP or IFRS (excluding
multiple-element arrangements for software).
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.40
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.41
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.42
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011
Slide 13.43
Alan Melville, International Financial Reporting, 3rd Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011