You are on page 1of 28

INDIA

Approach to Tax Due Diligence


February 25, 2009

M&A TAX
Contents of the presentation

 Tax Due Diligence – An overview

 The Process

 Deliverables – Report-drafting &


Conclusions

 Key Considerations

 Identifying business opportunities

 Annexures

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 2
What is “Due Diligence”

American Management Association

“Process for seeking sufficient information about a business entity to


reach an informed judgment as to its value for a specific purpose”

• Potential investors should have an understanding of the risks


associated with the business he proposes to acquire

• Knowledge of the Target and a detailed understanding of its


business risks critical in price negotiations

• Tax Due Diligence helps in identifying potential tax exposures


pertaining to the Target

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 3
Tax Due Diligence – An overview

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 4
Which HAT should we DON???

Tax Advisor Consultant Auditor

Open Tax Integration Valuation


Issues Issues Issues

Our scope is restricted to highlighting the potential tax issues and report
non-compliance by the Target

We are not to advise the client on Tax Strategies to mitigate any risk
during the due diligence process

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 5
Want of a Due Diligence

Buy-side

 Cases where we have been appointed by the INVESTOR to perform a diligence on the TARGET

 Strategic investment by investors for acquiring controlling stake in the Target

 Financial investment by investors without acquiring control of the Target

 Investments by Private Equity Funds / Venture Capital funds in the Target

 Acquisition of an undertaking or a part of an undertaking of the Target

Sell-side

 Cases where we have been appointed by the TARGET to perform a diligence on itself

 Sale or hive-off of an undertaking or a part of an undertaking by the Target

 Divestment or sale of stake by the Target to potential bidders

 Vendor Due Diligence to identify potential buyers


© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 6
Key Drivers from a Direct Tax perspective

Acquisitions

 Critical to highlight open tax issues & the underlying tax risks

 Significant tax-outflow / potential tax liability in the hands of the Target may be a factor in
consummation of the transaction

 Comment on the provision towards tax in books and the nature of contingent liability, if any

 Section 79 issue in case of closely-held companies

Sale of undertaking / asset sale

 Significant contingent liability on account of taxes could be an issue – Section 281 of the Act

 Continuity of any tax-benefits in the hands of the buyer to be ascertained

 Potential tax exposure to the buyer as a successor of business to be highlighted

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 7
Due Diligence – The Process

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 8
Under the scope

 As a first step, obtain the Letter of Engagement and understand the following;

 Exact scope of work and expectations of the TS Team / Client

 Limited DD vis-à-vis Detailed DD?

 Our client – Buyer or Seller…

 Critical to understand the “Historical Period” covered in the scope of work

 Fact finding exercise should be restricted to the Historical Period

 Open tax assessments and tax liability pertaining to period prior to the “Historical Period” should
be highlighted

 Potential Tax exposure on consummation of transaction may be highlighted though outside the
“Historical Period”

 Communicate the projected time-cost and time-overruns if any at the outset

 Find out the deadlines to issue report and obtain a format of the DD report

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 9
Familiarizing the Transaction

Prior to meeting the Target

 Obtain an understanding of the Target, its business, Promoters, etc.

 Understand the business sector and common tax issues relating to that sector

 Peruse the financial statements / corporate presentations if the Target is publicly


traded

 Hold discussions with TS Team and obtain an understanding of the Transaction

 Background and the proposed transaction structure;

 Promoter tax liability or implications;

 Obtain the ‘Term Sheet’ or ‘Transaction Memorandum’ if any to understand the


mechanics

 Obtain other related documents available including financial statements, Target PPTs, etc.

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 10
Knowing the Target

 Get a detailed understanding of the business of the Target and the proposed transaction
structure

 Critical to understand the rationale of the proposed transaction viz.

 Fund raising exercise through strategic / financial investment

 Divestment to raise funds for other business

 Sale of non-core businesses

 Focus on key tax issues while holding discussions with CFO, key management personnel,
etc.

 A detailed IRL to be provided to the Target and TS contact on conclusion of meeting

 Ask for all information needed to quantify exposures

 Agree time-lines with the Target for provision of information


© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 11
Information Requirement List – An overview

 Audited Financial Statements for the Historical Period

 Tax Audit reports for the Historical Period

 Returns of Income for the Historical Period

 Copy of orders, notices, documents, etc. issued by the Revenue

 Copy of TDS returns

 Assessment Status with a description of the amounts involved, demand raised, tax paid, tax authority
involved, etc.

 Details of contingent liability reported on account of tax demand raised and the nature thereof

 Critical agreements entered into by the Target, as deemed relevant for the transaction

 Ledger extracts, if relevant, of the following;

 Related party transactions;

 Provision for tax;

 Expense heads with significant sums

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 12
Deliverables – Report-drafting &
conclusions

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 13
What to report

 Comment on direct tax filings for the scope period, including:

 Timeliness of filings

 Aggressive positions adopted - should be highlighted with judicial precedents

 Review documents relating to open assessments / appellate proceedings and comment on potential
tax exposures

 Exposure to be quantified on an estimate basis

 Comment on possibility of tax exposures in foreign tax jurisdictions

 Comment on TDS filings, if within scope

 Comment on adequacy of provision for tax

 Comment on tax benefits and their availability in the future

 Output in the form of:

 Summary of issues

 DDR report

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 14
Report format – Points for consideration

 Executive Summary – Headlines

 Meant to highlight key issues for Management / CEO / Promoters, etc.

 Should highlight key & significant tax issues and quantify the potential exposure

 Should not be verbose and should not contain references to sections/citations

 Executive Summary – Key Findings

 Meant to highlight issues / finding to CFO / Finance Team

 Should report all the key findings of the review and quantify the potential exposure

 Should not be verbose and detailed in nature

 Supporting Analysis to Key Findings

 Detailed analysis to support the key findings

 Should include details of documents reviewed, discussions with Target officials, judicial
precedents, quantification of exposure, etc.

 Scope & Limitations

 Should highlight the documents / details that were provided for our review
© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 15
Concluding an issue

 Conclusions should be fact-based and based on the inputs given by the Target

 Supporting analysis to the key findings should clearly highlight the following points

 Case laws including citation, year, and jurisdiction of the concerned tax authority

 Circulars, instructions, etc. issued by the Revenue

 Documents provided by the Target should be clearly communicated

 Management information or information provided by the Target’s personnel

 External sources of information – Websites, etc.

 Research resouces for drawing conclusions include;

 Provisions of the Act;

 Case laws pronounced by judicial authorities;

 Commentaries on the provisions of the income-tax act

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 16
Tax findings significant in decision-making

 Deal Breakers

 Where the potential issue could derail the consummation of the transaction – Tax
issues may be a deal breaker

 E.g. Non-compliance with key regulations, etc.

 Valuation Issues

 Where the potential issue would be relevant in determining the valuation of the
business – Significant tax issues may in some cases impact the valuation of the
business

 E.g. Non-availability of tax benefits under section 10A/10AA, etc. – Could potentially
increase tax outflow by 33%

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 17
Tax findings significant in decision-making

 Warranties and Indemnity

 Parties to transactions typically seek reps and warranties to cover issues over which
they are concerned

 Where the consummation of the transaction would warrant seeking an indemnity for
potential future tax liability

 Other tax findings

 Tax risks knowingly taken over on the basis where other commercial parameters for
consummation of transaction are in favour

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 18
Key Considerations

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 19
Key Considerations…

 Identify key issues at an early stage and discuss the same with the TS contact / Client

 Seek clarifications from the Target prior to commenting on potential tax exposures in the
report

 Refrain from communicating potential tax exposures with the Target officials prior to
conclusion of the DD

 Quantify estimated amount and the likelihood of exposures resulting in future tax cash
outflow

 Report should be in plain English – should avoid technical jargon as far as possible

 Address the parties as ‘acquirer’ and ‘target company’

 Liaise with the identified contact of the target

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 20
Key Considerations…

 Do not discuss details of assignment with identified contact or any employees of the
Target

 End each day with a list of pending information

 Escalate if information not flowing through

 Seek information needed to quantify exposures

 Avoid commenting on deferred taxes unless specifically asked for

 Discussion with target company only along with supervisor

 Maintain confidentiality

 When in doubt, seek help either from supervisor or TS

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 21
Identifying Business Opportunities

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 22
Identifying Business opportunities

Buy-side opportunities

 Understand the proposed investment structure of the investor – Potential tax and regulatory issues to
be identified

 Alternative structures could be evaluated to mitigate any pain points

 E.g. Jurisdiction analysis and capital structuring where the buyer is a non-resident

 Tax issues identified during the DD could be significant – possible to suggest ways to mitigate tax
exposure

 E.g. Section 79 issue where losses cannot be carried forward

Sell-side opportunities

 Evaluate possible mechanics for hive-off of business or company

 E.g. Sale of business through demerger, slump sale or itemized sale

 Promoter taxability may be an issue where the promoter exits the business or dilutes stake

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 23
Annexures

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 24
Annexure 1 – “Reps & Warranties” and “Indemnity”

“Reps & Warranties”

 Reps & Warranties means “statements by which one party gives certain assurances to the
other, and on which the other party may rely”

 E.g. Rep is given with respect to carved out financial statements that they are correct
(mostly unaudited numbers)

 Where the Rep / Warranty is breached, parties have remedies under the agreement to
seek relief from the other party

Indemnity

 Indemnity means “to compensate another party to a contract for any loss that such other
party may suffer during the performance of the contract”

 Indemnity is a protection mechanism, when you have a quantifiable estimate of any


contingency that you will like to safeguard yourself against

 E.g. Buyer may seek indemnity against contingent tax liability that may devolve, tax
liability pertaining to the seller required to be borne by the buyer, etc.

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 25
Annexure 2 – Illustrative Check List of Issues (1/2)

 Implications of deemed dividend

 Restructuring (if any) and its implications on carry forward of tax losses and depreciation

 Tax benefits (if any) claimed by the company and conditions as to its eligibility

 Implications of change in shareholding in case of closely held companies

 Applicability of Section 14A of the Act

 Regulatory approvals, if any

 Transfer pricing implications if any

 Applicability of section 40(a)(i) / 40(a)(iii)

 Examination / verification of the reconciliation of TDS claim with taxable income

 Eligibility to claim foreign tax credit in India tax return

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 26
Illustrative Check List of Issues (2/2)

 Deductibility of interest u/s 36(1) (iii) of the Act

 Deductibility of bad debts / provision for bad debts

 Examination of whether the deduction claimed in respect of contractual/statutory liability is


allowable in the year under consideration

 Examination of whether provisions made on an estimated basis are allowable as


expenditure in computation of business income

 Examination of details of Miscellaneous/Sundry expenses for ascertaining whether the


said heads contain certain expenditures not allowable under the Act

 Examination of whether the payments made for expenses are disallowable under section
40A(3)

 Examination of tax treatment of “Provision for doubtful debts” while computing “Book
Profits” under MAT

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 27
Thank You

© 2009 KPMG, an Indian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All
rights reserved. 28

You might also like