This document provides an overview and comparison of the economic histories and development approaches of South Korea and Argentina. It discusses their pre-crisis, crisis, and post-crisis periods as well as PESTLE analyses and future recommendations. South Korea experienced rapid growth from the 1960s-1980s before an economic crisis in 1997 while Argentina had periods of stability and debt issues. Both countries received IMF loans and implemented reforms after their crises to stabilize their economies through measures like export promotion. The document recommends increased transparency, market discipline, and fiscal improvements to support continued development.
This document provides an overview and comparison of the economic histories and development approaches of South Korea and Argentina. It discusses their pre-crisis, crisis, and post-crisis periods as well as PESTLE analyses and future recommendations. South Korea experienced rapid growth from the 1960s-1980s before an economic crisis in 1997 while Argentina had periods of stability and debt issues. Both countries received IMF loans and implemented reforms after their crises to stabilize their economies through measures like export promotion. The document recommends increased transparency, market discipline, and fiscal improvements to support continued development.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document provides an overview and comparison of the economic histories and development approaches of South Korea and Argentina. It discusses their pre-crisis, crisis, and post-crisis periods as well as PESTLE analyses and future recommendations. South Korea experienced rapid growth from the 1960s-1980s before an economic crisis in 1997 while Argentina had periods of stability and debt issues. Both countries received IMF loans and implemented reforms after their crises to stabilize their economies through measures like export promotion. The document recommends increased transparency, market discipline, and fiscal improvements to support continued development.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
to Development Presented By: Anjandeep Kaur (440) Darpan Bajaj ( ) Neha Rai (292) Kanwarpreet Sangha ( ) Pandya Ashish Yogesh Bhai ( ) Ravi Vijay Gupta ( ) Rishab ( ) Pre-Crisis South Korea Argentina • Exponential growth from 1960s to • Rapid economic stability from 1860- 1980s. 1930. • Huge debt acquired during National • South Korea's GDP expanded by an Reorganization Process(1976-1983) average of more than 8 percent per • Creation of a new currency Austral in year. 1983, for which new loans were • They adopted outward-looking required. strategy in the early 1960s. • Hyperinflation: in the year 1989 • 4 Main industry which contributed to inflation reached 200% the growth were: • In 1991 Argentinean peso was legally – Shipping pegged to the dollar, on a one-to-one – Automobile basis. – Construction • Argentina's foreign investment and – Armaments exports dried up During Crisis South Korea Argentina • The Korean Won started to heavily • Huge flight of money from the country depreciate in October 1997. • Froze all the banks in the year 2001, • Non-performing loans at many of limiting withdrawals to $1,000 a month. Korea's merchant banks. • State of emergency declared • By December 1997, the IMF had precipitating the violent protests. approved a USD $21 billion loan. • In 2001 Government defaulted on the • Throughout 1998, Korea's economy larger part of the public debt, totaling would continue to shrink quarterly at $132 billion. an average rate of -6.65%. • GDP fell by a record 16 percent in the • Korean chaebol Daewoo became a first quarter of 2002 . casualty of the crisis as it was • Proportion of the Argentinean dismantled by the government in population living below the poverty line 1999 due to debt problems. increased to 57% Post-Crisis South Korea Argentina • By the first quarter of 1999, GDP • The devalued peso made Argentine growth had risen to 5.4%, and strong exports cheap and competitive abroad, while discouraging imports. growth there after combined with • The government encouraged import deflationary pressure on the currency substitution and accessible credit for lead to a yearly growth of 10.5%. businesses. • Foreign investment and export played • aggressive plan to improve tax collection setting aside an important role in boosting growth large amounts of money for social which later on declined. welfare while controlling expenditure in • other fields. Growth moderated to about 4-5% • By December 2005, foreign currency annually between 2003 and 2007. reserves had reached $28 billion • Due to export growth, low interest • The exchange rate had been stabilized rates, and an expansionary fiscal near a reference value of 3 pesos to the dollar. policy has not affected much in 2008 • The GDP jumped 8.8% in 2003, 9.0% in crisis. 2004, 9.2% in 2005, 8.5% in 2006 8.7% in 2007, 5%in 2008 & -2.5% in 2009 PESTLE – South Korea POLITICAL ECONOMICAL SOCIAL • Government involvement • USD $21 billion loan. • Family run business in chaebol. • Export oriented country environment. • Continuous intervention dependent on USA and • High level of corruption. by the govt. in banking other countries. • Large labour force. sector. • Unstable political environment. TECHNOLOGICAL LEGAL ENVIRONMENTAL • Low Quality Image • Government control • Climate of Korean • R&D expenditure kept • Forced conditionalities company was secrecy. increasing. laid down by IMF. • Lack of transparency in regulatory system. PESTLE – Argentina POLITICAL ECONOMICAL SOCIAL • Argentine governance • High level of unemployment • High level of corruption fluctuated between civilian and •Since 2002, the country has •State of emergency declared military rule. embarked on a path of gradual in 2001, leading to protests and •Highly unstable until 2002. economic recovery intense rioting. Now a politically stable •Unresolved and pressing •Enormous regional disparities. democratic state. issues of inflation and energy •Economic and political crisis shortage of 2001 TECHNOLOGICAL LEGAL ENVIRONMENTAL • Significant technology gap •Mixture of US and West • Staunch commitment to with leading economies European legal systems; has limited government regulation •private sector investments in not accepted compulsory ICJ and corruption during 1990’s R&D are low jurisdiction •Wide gap between those •Hampered by a low number of •The current government sectors linked to transnational researchers holding advanced generally has a good track financial sectors and the rest of university degrees record on human rights. the economy. Future South Korea Argentina • Low birth rate and aging population. • Economic indicators in Argentina point • Erosion of tax base. to a severe downturn. • • Argentina has experienced an increase Hindrance to the security of the in capital flight since mid-2007, nation. totaling $26 billion till 2009. • Low productivity. • The country has experienced a severe decline in the volume of imports • Severe contraction in investment in the manufacturing and production sectors • Real wages in both the public and private sectors have increased by 2.1% Recommendation
South Korea Argentina
• There should be transparency and less • Fiscal improvement is needed secrecy to increase the profitability. • Negotiate wage policies with unions, • Market discipline should be there for and reduces its public expenditure financial institutions. • Reform agenda would help Argentina • Reduce government control in foreign demonstrate transparency and strong exchange market. fiscal policies • A depreciation of the peso may help Thank You
[Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series] Gian Luca Gardini, Maria Hermínia Tavares de Almeida (Eds.) - Foreign Policy Responses to the Rise of Brazil_ Balancing Power in Emerging States (2