Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CON5
CON5
Time Response
Analysis
Test signals
• Impulse
• Step
• Ramp
Test signals
• Sinusoidal.
(frequency response)
Laplace Transforms
Impulse (t) 1
step u-1 (t) 1/s
Ramp t u-1 (t) 1/s 2
Order of a
system is ???
Order of a
system is order
of the differential
equation
zeroth order system :
C(s) / R(s) = K
a constant
(algebraic equation)
Examples of zeroth
order systems :
Potentiometer
dc amplifier
dc
First order systems:
C(s) / R(s) = K / (s + a)
Open loop
1000 / ( 100 + 200 s )
= 10 / ( 1 + 2 s )
Closed loop
1000 / ( 200 + 200 s )
= 5/(1+s)
open loop
vt (s) = (vr (s) )(10 / ( 1+2 s ))
= (25 / s )( 10 / (1 + 2 s)
Vt () = 250 V
closed loop
vt(s) = ( 25 / s)( 5 / ( 1+s ))
Vt () = 125 V.
250
200
150
100
x1
50 x2
1
2
1
s s 1 s
-t/
c(t) = t - (1 e )
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 0. 1 1. 2 2. 3 3. 4 4. 5 5. 6 6. 7 7. 8 9 9
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
c
t
c
t
Second order
systems
2
C(s) n
2
2
R ( s ) s 2 n s + n
For unit step input
1
R(s) =
s
Applying final value
theorem
C(t) t =1.0
Second order
example
- position control.
r + Kp KA + KT 1 L
Ra s(Js+B)
- -
sKb
Taking
KP = 0.1 V / rad
KA = 10 V / V
KT = Kb = 0.5 Nm/A
or
V/rad/sec.
J = 1 Kg m 2
= 0. 5
s +s+1 =
2
s + 0.5
2 2
3
2
j 3
2
- 0.5
3
-j 2
In general
s + 2 n s + n
2 2
s + n n 1
2 2
2
s1,2 n
j n 1 2
= - n j d
d = n 1 - 2
d damped frequency
damping factor
n undamped
natural frequency
For 0 < < 1
roots of s are
complex conjugate
For = 1
roots are
repeating at
s = - n
For > 1
roots are real
= 0 : undamped
01:
under damped
1 : critically dam ped
> 1 : over dam ped
Unit step response
r (t) = u-1 (t)
1
R (s) = ----
s
0
2
c( s) n
s ( s n )
2 2
1 s
2 2
s s n
= 0
c ( t ) = 1 - cos nt
(pure oscillation)
0 1:
n 2
s (s + 2 ns + )
2
n
2
1 s + 2 n
s + 2 ns +
2
n
2
1 s + n
s + 2 ns +n
2 2
n
s + 2 ns +
2
n
2
we know
1
u -1 ( t )
s
s
cos at
s a
2 2
a
2 2
sin at
s a
s+b -bt
2 2
e cos at
(s+b) +a
a - bt
2 2
e sin at
(s+b) +a
s n
s 2 n s n
2 2
( s n )
( s n ) d
2 2
nt
e cos d t
n
s 2 s n
2
n
2
n d
.
d ( s n ) d
2 2
n - n t
.e sin d t
d
- n t
.e sin d t
1 2
Combine sine cos terms :
1
1- 2
1
( 1- 2
)
1
sin ( d t +
1- 2
where cos = .
c (t) =
- n t
e
1- sin ( d t + )
1 2
e- nt
C(t) 1+
1- 2
1.0 e-nt
1-
1-2
Time(t)
- n
d is the imaginary
part of roots
2
j n 1 - d
Cos =
n 1- 2
n
- n
C(t)
Mp Tolerance band
1.0
Time
tr
tp
dc
0
dt
sin (dt + ). cos
dt =
Time at peak
overshoot ( tp )
tp = /d
At t = tp ,
n .t p
e
c(t p ) 1 sin ( + )
2
1
2
n . n 1
1 e
1 2
M p e
1 2
e 100%.
As damping factor
increases …
peak overshoot ??
As damping factor
increases …
40
30
20
10
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Settling time (ts)
Assume tolerance
band 5%
ln (0.05) n t s
3
or ts =
n
t s for 2% tolerance is
4
n
Rise time (tr)
- n t r
e
c (t r ) = 1 = 1 -
1 2
sin ( d t r + )
or
sin (dtr + ) = 0
dtr + =
or
tr
d
Steady state
error for step
input = 0
Steady state error
of a second order
system with ramp
input:
E(s) = R(s) - C(s)
1 n 2
s
2
(s + 2 ns + n )
2 2
1 s 2 n s
2
.
s s 2 n s + n
2 2 2
e(t) = Lt sE(s)
t s 0
2
n
For = 0.5 &
n = 1
ess = 1 unit
An example :
R + 1 C
K s(s+1)
-
K
G
s ( s 1)
K
C R 2
s sK
nn K
1
2 K
Let K = 100
n = 10 rad / sec
= 0.05
Mp
1 2
e 100%
= 85 %
ess for ramp input
= 2 /n
= 0.1 / 10
= 0.01
While the steady state
error is acceptable
Mp is not. - Damping
to be increased to say,
0.5
Then 2 n = 1
1
n = 1
2 0.5
ess increases to 1 - not
acceptable. So we go for
changing the configuration
of the amplifier - derivative
error compensation.
Error coefficients
Lt G ( s) K p
s 0
(position error coeff.)
Then
1
ess
1 K p
Ramp input
R (s) = 1/s
2
(Constant velocity)
Steady state error
in position
1 1
Lt s 2 .
s 0 s 1 G ( s)
1 1
Lt
s 0 sG ( s ) Kv
K v = velocity error coefficient
parabolic input
R (s) = 1/s 3
(constant acceleration)
Steady state error
in position
1 1
Lt s. 3
s 0 s 1 G (s)
1 1
Lt 2
s 0 s G ( s ) Ka
Ka = acceleration error
coefficient
( s z1 )( s z 2 )(....)
G ( s) n
s ( s p1 )( s p2 )(....)
n type of the system
Type ‘0’ system
K p Lt G ( s ) finite value
s 0
1
e ss finite value
1 K p
Type ‘0’ system
K v Lt sG (s) 0
s 0
e ss
Type ‘0’ system
2
K a Lt s G (s ) 0
s 0
e ss
Type ‘1’ system
K p L t G (s)
s 0
e ss 0
Type ‘1’ system
K v L t s G (s)
s 0
finite
e ss 1 K v finite
Type ‘1’ system
2
K a Lt s G (s ) 0
s 0
e ss
Type ‘2’ system
K p L t G (s)
s 0
e ss 0
Type ‘2’ system
K v L t s G (s)
s 0
e ss 0
Type ‘2’ system
2
K a Lt s G (s) finite
s 0
e ss 1 K a finite
input
u-1(t) t2
Type tu-1(t) u 1 ( t )
2
1
0 1 Kp
1
1 0 Kv
1
2 0 0 Ka
When feedback is non unity,
K p Lt G ( s ) H ( s )
s 0
K v Lt s G ( s ) H ( s )
s 0
2
K a Lt s G ( s ) H ( s )
s 0
Derivative error
Compensation
R + 1 C
K s(s+1)
-
r + Kp KA
-
L
+ 1 L
KT/Ra s(Js+B)
-
sKb
with
K = 100
n = 10 rad/sec
= 0.05
Mp = 85% (not acceptable)
t s (2%) 4 n 8 sec.
ess for ramp input
(type ‘1’ system)
= 0.01
Objective : increase the
damping factor
to K + s KD
K sK D
G ( s)
s( s 1)
G( s) K s KD
2
G(s) 1 s s K s K D
n = K ( no change)
= 10 rad/sec
2 n = 1 + KD
for = 0.5,
KD = 9
ess for ramp input
remains the same
at 0.01
4
t s ( 2%) 0.8 sec.
n
Derivative output Compensation
R + + 1 C
K
- - s(s+1)
sKt
K
100 - - - - - (1)
1 Kt
2 n 1 Kt
or K 1 K t (2)
From (1) & (2),
K 100
or K 10000
K t 99.
Comparing both methods…
derivative output
•transducer required
•gain reduced due to
feedback
Integral Control
+ KI 1
KA
s s ( s 1)
-
K As K I
G ( s) 2
s ( s 1)
type 2
ess for step input = 0
ess for ramp input = 0
ess for parabolic
input is finite
However system
becomes of 3 rd order
- stability problem -
will be discussed in
later chapters