Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formal Informal
Command Interest
Task Friendship
Formal Group: A designated work
group defined by the organisation’s
structure.
Informal Group: A group that is
neither formally structured nor
organizationally determined; appears
in response to the need for social
contact. Membership in such groups id
voluntary.
Command group: A group composed
of the individuals who report directly
to a given manager.
Task group: represents those who
work together to complete a job task.
“ All command groups are task
groups but all task groups need not
be command groups as task groups
can cut across the organization.”
Interest group : A group of employees
who come together to satisfy a
common interest ;like improving
working conditions, protesting
company’s environmental policies, or
adjusting vacation schedules.
Friendship group
Why people join groups
To satisfy mutual interests
To achieve security
To fill social needs
To fill need for self esteem.
Five stage model of group
formation Stage V
Group
Stage IV Adjourning
Performing may
Stage III Group disband
Stage II Norming
Members members either
Stage I Storming
Members Work work after
come to
Forming
Members Resist
Together towards meeting
get to know Control by developing Getting their goals
group
each other & Leaders & Close their jobs or because
set ground Show Relationships done members
rules hostility & feelings of Leave
Cohesiveness
Punctuated Equilibrium Model
Its is an alternative model for
temporary groups with deadlines’ as
they generally don’t follow the Five
Stage Model.
It claims that groups generally plan
their activities during the first half of
their time and then revise and
implement their plans in the second
half.
Punctuated Equilibrium Model
High
Completi
on
Phase 2
First
Meeting Transitio
Phase n
A 1 (A+B)/ B
2
(Lo
w)
During the first half or Phase 1, groups
define their tasks, setting a mission
that is unlikely to change until the
second half of the group’s life.
Once groups reach the midpoint of
their life they experience a sort of
“middle life crisis” and recognize they
must change how they operate if they
are going to meet their goals.
This begins phase 2 of their existence,
which is the time when group drops
old way of thinking and adopt new
perspectives.
Groups then carry out their mission
until they reach the end of phase two
when they show bursts of activity
needed to complete their task.
Dynamics of group formation
Theodore Newcomb’s classic balance theory of
group formation
–Identifiable stages of group development:
Forming
Storming
Norming
Performing
Adjourning
–Primary groups
Small groups and self-managed teams
–Coalitions
–Other types of groups
Memberships and reference groups
In-groups and out-groups
Implications from research on
group dynamics
High Moderate
Hig Productivity Productivity
h
Types of Group
Effectiveness Interact Brainstorm Nominal Electron
No. & quality
Criteria ing ing ic High
Low Moderate High
of ideas
High Low Low
Social Pressure Moderate
Money Cost Low Low Low High
Speed Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Task Orientation Low High High
High
Potential for
High
interpersonal conflict Low Moderate Low
Commitment to solution
High NA Moderate Moderate
Development of group
High High Moderate Low
cohesiveness
Teams –
self-managed
and cross-
functional
Cross-functional teams
–Synchronous technologies
Self-managed teams
A group of employees who are
responsible for managing and
performing technical tasks that result
in a product or service being delivered
to an internal or external customer
Training guidelines: self-managed
teams
How to make teams more effective
–Team building
–Collaboration
–Group leadership
–Cultural/global issues