Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management
1-3
The Competitive Environment
Porter’s five forces
•
•An analysis of industry structure
• The framework tries to capture the variation of
competition while remaining pervasive/broad
and rigorous/precise
• Generalizations are made to all industries on
the basis of 5 core elements
• Undertaken from the perspective of incumbent
/current organizations
The Competitive Environment
Porter’s five forces
• Undertaken at the level of an organization’s strategic
business unit (SBU)
• Industry attractiveness (profit potential)
determined by interaction of 5 competitive forces
Figure 3.1
The Competitive Environment
Porter’s five forces
1-11
The Competitive Environment
Porter’s five forces
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers
NB The buyer is the firm in the industry and the
supplier is the producer of that firm’s input
• Supplier power increases when:
- the supplier industry is dominated by a few companies
- It is more concentrated than the industry it sells to
- suppliers are faced with few substitutes
- suppliers’ products are differentiated
- suppliers pose a credible threat of forward integration
Supplier Power
• Supplier power – high when buyers have
few choices and low when choices are many
• The opposite of buyer power
1-13
The Competitive Environment
Porter’s five forces
The Threat of Substitute Products and
Services
• The threat from products and services that can
meet similar needs
• It does not refer to competition from new entrants
• Substitutes limit the potential returns of an
industry
• The price/performance ratio of substitute
products will determine the extent of their threat
The Competitive Environment
Porter’s five forces
The Intensity of Rivalry among Competitors
This is affected by:
• Numerous or equally balanced competitors
• Slow industry growth
• High fixed costs
• Lack of differentiation or switching costs
• Extra capacity in large increments
• High exit barriers
The Competitive Environment
Criticisms of Porter’s Five Forces
• The five forces framework assumes a zero-
sum game . i.e. competitors can only succeed
at the expose or representation of other
players in the industry. For example Toyota
and Honda work closely with their suppliers to
ensure that parts are available at the right
price of the exact quality and only when
needed in order to reduce inventory and
associated costs.
The Competitive Environment
Criticisms of Porter’s Five Forces
• It is static and assumes stable markets
• Many strategies are not deliberate but
emerge (Mintzberg and Waters, 1985)
• The government might usefully constitute a
sixth force
• The five forces need to approximate more
closely a dynamic theory of strategy
The Competitive Environment
Extending Porter’s Five Forces
Figure 3.4
The Competitive Environment
Strategic Group Analysis
Strategic groups are:
• Firms in an industry following similar or identical
strategies
• Strategic groups constitute a cluster within an
industry
• Mobility barriers deter movement between
strategic groups
• If strategic groups are moving further apart
‘strategic space’ may exist that can be exploited
The Competitive Environment
Hypercompetition
• A relentless mode of competitive behaviour to
force competitors out of the industry
• The market is characterised by constant
disequilibrium
• An example is Microsoft in software application
• It requires competitors to constantly upgrade
and innovate
• The effect is to erode any competitive
advantage