Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EIA
BHAVANI .V
PROJECT FACULTY
NABET APPROVED EXPERT
(EIA Coordinator, AP & WP)
The Environment (Protection) Act E PT RI
I. Preliminary
IV. Miscellaneous .
5
Definition of EIA
E PT RI
Environmental
Impact Assessment is
A formal process for identifying:
• likely effects of activities or Environment is
projects on the broadly interpreted:
ENVIRONMENT, and on physical, biological,
human health and welfare. and social.
• means and measures to
mitigate & monitor these In EIA, the term
“impacts” is used
impacts
instead of “effects
of activities.”
What is an
impact?
6
Definition of EIA
E PT RI
8
Sustainable development
E PT RI
Social
Developoment
SD
Economic
Environmental Development
Development
9
Aims and objectives of EIA E PT RI
10
Core Value of EIA E PT RI
The environment impact process was integrated into the Indian legal system in 1994 when
Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification came into existence.
The objective of the Notification was to push for more sustainable industrialisation
process in the country after giving due consideration to environmental and social impacts.
For doing so, the notification imposed restrictions on setting up, modernising or expanding
any new project or proposal without getting an environmental clearance from the
government.
The notification specified the type of project/proposal that needed environmental
clearance and thus would have to conduct the EIA.
The Act made it mandatory for all projects listed in schedule 1 to get an environmental
clearance from the Central government, be it, for setting or expanding any plant anywhere
in the country. It also listed a number of projects/proposals, which have been exempted
from the environment clearance process or public hearing.
The notification also made provisions for formation of an Impact Assessment Agency
(IAA), which essentially consisted of experts for review of the documents submitted to the
MoEF for clearance. It defined the roles and responsibilities of the IAA and has fixed
time frame for various stages of the environmental clearance process. The notification also
made the provision for the proponent to reapply in case it was rejected due to lack of data.
It, however, placed a penalty of automatic rejection in case of misrepresentation and
concealing of factual data.
{
Amendment’s to EIA-1994 E PT RI
The EIA notification 1994 was amended 12 times in 11 years. While most of the amendments diluted the process of
environmental clearance process, there were some, which also strengthened the process. Some of the key amendments
are discussed as follows:
Amendment on April 10, 1997: The process of environmental public hearing (EPH) was introduced in the environmental
clearance process. The SPCBs were entrusted to conduct public hearing to get the views and concerns of the affected
community and interested parties for the proposed project. It was also entrusted with forming an EPH committee to ensure
fair representation in the public hearing process. This amendment also made some changes with reference to the
environmental clearance required for power plants.
Amendment on June 13, 2002: This amendment diluted the purpose of the notification exempting many industries
from the EIA process or from the entire environment clearance process on the basis of level of investment.
It exempted pipeline and highway projects from preparing the EIA report, but these projects would have to conduct public
hearings in all the districts through which the pipeline or highway passes.
A number of projects were totally exempted from the Notification if the investment was less than Rs 100 crore for new
projects and less than Rs. 50 crore for expansion/modernisation projects.
Most of the industries exempted from the clearance process had a very high social and environmental impact even if the
investment was less than Rs 100 crore. For example, in case of hydel power projects, irrespective of the investment, there will
be social impacts due to displacement.
No EIA was required for modernisation projects in irrigation sector if additional command area was less than 10,000
hectares or project cost was less than Rs. 100 crore.
Amendment on 28th February, 2003: It took into consideration location-sensitivity into the environment clearance
process.
Amendment on 7th May 2003: The notification was amended to expand the lists of activities involving risk or hazard.
Amendment on August 4th 2003: This amendment was similar to the one in February 2003 that tried bringing in location-
sensitivity in the entire environmental clearance process. Any project located in a critically polluted area, within a radius of
15 kilometres of the boundary of reserved forests, ecologically sensitive areas, which include national parks, sanctuaries,
biosphere reserves; and any State, had to obtain environmental clearance from the Central Government.
Contd… E PT RI
Amendment on September 2003: Site clearance was made mandatory for green field
airport, petrochemical complexes and refineries.
Amendment on July 7th, 2004: It made EIA mandatory for construction and industrial
estate.
13th Amendment on 4th July 2005: The amendment provided that projects related to
expansion or modernisation of nuclear power and related project, river valley project, ports,
harbours and airports, thermal power plants and mining projects with a lease area of more
than 5 hectares could be taken up without prior environmental clearance. The Central
Government in the Ministry of Environment and Forests may, on case to case basis, in
public interest, relax the requirement of obtaining prior environmental clearance and may,
after satisfying itself, grant temporary working permission on receipt of application in the
prescribed format for a period not exceeding two years, during which the proponent shall
obtain the requisite environmental clearance as per the procedure laid down in the
notification. The grant of temporary working permission would not necessarily imply that the
environmental clearance would be granted for the said project.
There was a wide spread opinion that the EIA notification was not able to address all the
concerns and had several weaknesses which was making the entire clearance process
weak. This was the reason why Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) initiated
the process of bringing in some significant modifications in the environment clearance
process. A draft notification was published on September 15, 2005. This was put up for
public comment for a year and was notified in September 2006. 15
Comparison of Old & New systems
E PT RI
17
Categorization of projects - EIA Notification, 2006
E PT RI
Scale of Impact
Severity of Impact
Nature of location
18
EIA 2006 Preamble E PT RI
Central Government hereby directs that on and from the date of its
publication (14th September, 2006)
21
Specific Condition E PT RI
If any Industrial Estate/Complex / Export processing Zones /Special Economic Zones/Biotech Parks /
Leather Complex with homogeneous type of industries such as Items 4(d), 4(f), 5(e), 5(f), or those
Industrial estates with pre –defined set of activities (not necessarily homogeneous, obtains prior
environmental clearance, individual industries including proposed industrial housing within such
estates /complexes will not be required to take prior environmental clearance, so long as the Terms
and Conditions for the industrial estate/complex are complied with (Such estates/complexes must
have a clearly identified management with the legal responsibility of ensuring adherence to the Terms
and Conditions of prior environmental clearance, who may be held responsible for violation of the
same throughout the life of the complex/estate).
4(d) - Chlor-alkali industry
5(e) Petrochemical products and petrochemical based processing such as production of carbon black and
electrode grade graphite (processes other than cracking & reformation and not covered under the
complexes).
5(f) Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk drugs and intermediates
excluding drug formulations; synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals, other synthetic organic chemicals
and chemical intermediates)
22
State Level Environment Impact Assessment
Authority (SEIAA)
E PT RI
Expert Committees at Central and State Level will screen, scope and
The EAC and SEAC shall be reconstitute after every three years
25
26
• Appraisal
Step IV
• Public Consultation
Step III
• Scoping
Step II
• Screening (only for Category ‘B’ Step I
projects)
E PT RI
Stages in Environmental Appraisal
Stage – I Screening E PT RI
Category B
27
Stage 1: Screening E PT RI
Only for Category B projects and activities to determine if they need EIA
For categorization of projects into B1 or B2, the MoEF shall issue appropriate guidelines
from time to time
Stage – II Scoping E PT RI
29
Stage II: Scoping E PT RI
If the ToR is not finalized and conveyed, then it shall be be deemed as final ToR for the
EIA studies.
In case of Category Hydroelectric project – ToR shall be conveyed along with the
clearance for pre-construction activities.
Approved ToR shall be displayed on the website of the MoEF or the concerned SEIAA
33
EIA report Preparation E PT RI
34
Stage –III Public Consultation E PT RI
All Category ‘A’ and Category B1 projects or activities shall undertake Public
Consultation which has exemptions under few cases. 35
Components - Public Consultation E PT RI
37
Presiding over Public Hearing E PT RI
40
Stage 4: Appraisal E PT RI
The regulatory authority shall consider the recommendations of the EAC or SEAC concerned and
convey its decision to the applicant
The regulatory authority shall normally accept the recommendations of the Expert Committees
In cases where it disagrees with the recommendations of the Expert Committee (Central or State),
the regulatory authority shall request reconsideration by the Central or State Expert Appraisal
Committee
If decision not granted within stipulated time, the applicant may proceed as if the environment
clearance sought for has been granted or denied by the regulatory authority in terms of the final
recommendations of the Expert Committee concerned
Monitoring
Discussions with the client for sharing the views related to DPR
preparation and obtained approved ToR from MoEF&CC.
49
Draft Amendment - 18th December, 2017 E PT RI
50
EC – Certified Compliance Report E PT RI
51
New Delhi, the 28th June, 2018 E PT RI
52
Dated: 27.02.2018 E PT RI
1. Thermal Power
2. Cement
3. Ship Breaking Yards
4. Chemical Fertilizers
5. Sugar
6. Distillieries
7. Leather/Skin/Hide Processing Industry
8. Offshore and On-shore Oil & Gas Exploration, Development & production
(9) Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs)
9. Industrial Estates
10. Pulp & Paper
11. Common Municipal Solid Wastes
12. Petroleum Refineries
13. Petrochemical Plants
14. Pesticides and Pesticide Intermediates
15. Chlor Alkali Industry
16. Synthetic Organic Industry(
17. Petrol-chemical based production
18. Coke Oven Plants
19. Soda Ash
20. Integrated Paints
21. Man-made Fibre
22. Oil & Gas Transportation pipe-line
23. Isolated Storages and handling of hazardous chemicals
24. Metallurgical Industries
25. Induction/Arc Furnaces
26. Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Dispos
al Facilities
Final EIA Manuals prepared by ASCI E PT RI
(1) Mining
(2) Mineral Beneficiation
(3) Ports and Harbours
(4) Airports
(5-A) Building Construction
(5-B) Townships
(6) Asbestos
(7) Highways
(8) Coal Washery
(9) Aerial Ropeways
(10) Nuclear Power Plants,Nuclear
Fuel Processing plants and Nuclear Waste
Managment Plants
Loopholes and deficiencies E PT RI
Stage 1 - Screening
Based on info (form 1, 1A) supplied by investor
Pre-feasibility report and conceptual plan - no guidelines or
requirements, thereby no need to address environmental
issues
Stage 2 - Scoping
No public participation in scoping process - local knowledge
about what environmental concerns should be investigated
is not given consideration
Strict timeline – not a continuous process
Biased in securing favorable Terms of Reference (TOR) for
investors
Access to TOR limited
Loopholes and deficiencies E PT RI
Huge list of exemptions for certain types of projects that cause deep
environmental impact without justification
• Weak wording that widens the scope of these exemptions
Publicity
• Use of internet as the main means
• No definition on how publicity should be carried out
Appraisal
No public participation
65
LAYOUT
6
Land Details
Area Statement Comprehensive Land Use Analysis for EMC and
General Industrial Park
Land taken from Rev. Dept. 373.25
Total Extent
Land use Area in Ac. % of Area
Deduct Kothwal Cheruvu 33.50
Extent of land 373.24
Total Layout Area 339.75
Deduct Tank Area 33.5
6
TOPO MAP FOR PROPOSED PROJECT SITE
68
Latest Photographs of the site
6
Revised layout
Plan of EHP
70
Land use comparison
S.No. Land use Area in Area in acres
acres (Old lay out)
(Revised)
1. Total area 339.75 339.75
2. Plotted area 188.98 197.19
(55.64 %) (58.04%)
3. Roads area 63.92 63.92
4. Green and open area 41.99 33.98
space area (12.35%) (10%)
5. Common Facilities 31.10 30.90
6 Utilities 13.76 13.76
7 No. Of plots (120) No. Of plots (123)
71
PCPIR AREA
• Total Area: 640 sq.km (64000 hectares) – largest PCPIR in India
• Processing Area (41%): 270 sq.km (26,500 hectares)
• 6 SEZs within AP PCPIR – 7,325 hectares (Notified area - 4,128 Ha)
74