Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experimental Gingivitis in Man: Harald Löe, Else Theilade, S. Börglum Jensen, 1965
Experimental Gingivitis in Man: Harald Löe, Else Theilade, S. Börglum Jensen, 1965
Man
Harald Löe, Else Theilade, S. Börglum Jensen, 1965
Aim
• Researchers sought to induce gingivitis in subjects with healthy
gingiva by ceasing oral hygiene practices
• Study change in oral microflora
• How long it would take for gingivitis to occur
• Which sites are more affected
• How long would it take for gingivitis to resolve after resuming oral
hygiene practices
Method
• 12 healthy subjects (mean age 23) with healthy gingiva
• Gingiva assessed for health and plaque accumulation at the start
• Subjects instructed to cease oral hygiene routine
• No-hygiene period ended when gingivitis was diagnosed at
subsequent examination
• Detailed hygiene instructions given
• Experiment ended when gingivitis resolved
Gingival index
• From Löe & Silness, 1963
• Each tooth given a score for 3 sites (buccal,
lingual, mesial)
• Average score of 3 sites gave GI for the tooth
• Teeth grouped (incisors, premolars, molars)
and score for group derived from average
score of teeth
• Average score of all teeth became GI score
for patient
Plaque index
• From Silness & Löe, 1964
• Each tooth given a score for 3 sites (buccal,
lingual, mesial)
• Average score of 3 sites gave GI for the
tooth
• Teeth grouped (incisors, premolars, molars)
and score for group derived from average
score of teeth
• Average score of all teeth became GI score
for patient
• Presence/absence of calculus was not
recorded
Bacteria examination
• Two Methods
• Impression technique, stained with gentian violet
• Conventional Smears made from plaque samples at the same sites. Samples
collected with scaling instruments right after impression and stained with gram stain.
• Observed under microscope and classified by morphological characteristics
• Microflora at buccal gingival margin 24, 25, 26, and papillary area mesial 26
and mesial to 25
• Levels recorded
• Examined at intervals from start of experiment until end of no-hygiene
period, final examination done when healthy gingiva is established
Key findings – Plaque
• All subjects accumulated a large amount of plaque by the end of the
no-hygiene period. Mean PI increased from .43 to 1.67
• No major difference in plaque accumulation between maxillary and
mandibular arches, nor between different groups of teeth
• Lingual surfaces accumulated less than buccal and interproximal
surfaces
• PI dropped soon after oral hygiene measures resumed
Key findings – Gingivitis
• All subjects developed gingivitis
• Mean GI increased from .27 to 1.05
• 3 subjects developed gingivitis in 10 days
• 9 others between 15 and 21 days
• No major difference in gingival inflammation between maxillary and
mandibular arches, nor between different groups of teeth
• Interproximal surfaces scored higher and lingual surfaces scored lower
• Interproximal areas of maxillary molars most affected, lingual of mandibular
premolars least affected
• Gingivitis resolved a week after oral hygiene resumed
Key findings – Plaque composition