This document contains responses from Norma Devi Kurniasari to feedback on her thesis from three reviewers - Mr. Reddy, Mr. Ferdinandus, and Mr. Gunawan. She addresses each of their comments and concerns, explaining the changes and additions she has made to her thesis manuscript. Key points include adding more detail on calculation accuracy, decision making processes, comparisons to old systems, and accountability of the adaptive evaluation system. Overall, the responses indicate Norma has revised her thesis to provide more thorough explanations, examples, and analysis to address the reviewers' feedback.
This document contains responses from Norma Devi Kurniasari to feedback on her thesis from three reviewers - Mr. Reddy, Mr. Ferdinandus, and Mr. Gunawan. She addresses each of their comments and concerns, explaining the changes and additions she has made to her thesis manuscript. Key points include adding more detail on calculation accuracy, decision making processes, comparisons to old systems, and accountability of the adaptive evaluation system. Overall, the responses indicate Norma has revised her thesis to provide more thorough explanations, examples, and analysis to address the reviewers' feedback.
This document contains responses from Norma Devi Kurniasari to feedback on her thesis from three reviewers - Mr. Reddy, Mr. Ferdinandus, and Mr. Gunawan. She addresses each of their comments and concerns, explaining the changes and additions she has made to her thesis manuscript. Key points include adding more detail on calculation accuracy, decision making processes, comparisons to old systems, and accountability of the adaptive evaluation system. Overall, the responses indicate Norma has revised her thesis to provide more thorough explanations, examples, and analysis to address the reviewers' feedback.
214210447 Magister ~ Information Technology Institut Sains Terapan dan Teknologi Surabaya 21 Des 2017’ Mr. Reddy 1. Prove the calculation accuracy and explain the details! Already added on pages 99 and 103. 2. Need to prove the Rule is used correctly, the selection of the right questions or not (think of the solution). Already added on page 99 for the selection of exact questions or not. 3. Change stop decision making! Already added on page 103. Test the dismissal criteria by eliminating the error difference requirement <= 0.01 4. Explain decision making for value giving (importance weightedness) Already dded at page 48 5. Fix the book to describe it related to the decision tree, research results. Theory is reduced! It has been reduced to 20 pages for Chapter 2. 6. The summary format changed! It's been changed 7. How better SIMPTIF proofing is better than other method (do explanation in book to answer this) It has been proved by correlation on pages 101-105 Mr. Ferdinandus 1. The test in detail until the score of students in test with adaptive evaluation should given on the book in order to can be really approved the benefit of adaptive evaluation score only 5 students It has been added in chapter 4 page 63-105 2. Student evaluation and justice for students have to reaponsible with this evaluation It has been added in chapter 4 page 63-105 3. The comparison with the old system It has been added in chapter 4 page 104
4. The two ways from four ways have stopped test in the book page 58 should be clearly and there were explanations in the plus book have already researched truth. It has been added in chapter 4 page 103 Mr. Gunawan 1. Explanation or specification of dataset and topic categorization and difficulty level of each question including the difficulty of history It has been added on page 33 2. Accountability of the hypothesis is 80%, the way to calculate is not from excel, but write how to count in book It has been added on page 99 and 103 3. Analysis of a. sequence of student answers b. sequence of questions given (related to sub topic and difficulty level) c. stop in what number d. start from student who given the system. it has to be showed to student's N. the value of N depends on the category of the system assessment of the student. for example student's competence It has been added on chapter 4 page 63 and 105 4. Tracing calculations for this decisions should be given a detailed example on the report book a. decide to stop or continue b. choose question from the question bank c. decision of value that is given to student It has been added on chapter 4 page 63-105 5. How is it possible when the number of competencies = 10. the Adaptive of this system can stop at the third problem. eventhough every competencies are independent. It has been added on chapter 4 page 63- 105. The algorithm of SIMPATIF refers to a pure CAT algorithm with a stopping rule of error difference 0,01 6. Why the value is not given for each competency in this multimedia subject? Give value for each competency if they are independent It has been added on chapter 4 at page 63-105 7. Analyse how the first question are choosen, dealed with 10 independent cempetencies It has been added on chapter 4 page 63-105. 8. Responsible to it in the book how rapidminer results are easily used by the system It has been added on chapter 4 at page 52-55 9. System architecture clearly concern to competence, but in the program it's clearly ignored. Give your reason! It has been added on chapter 4 at page 63-105 10. Log files for each experiment should be degenerated for verification It has been added to the system and C attachment Thank You NORMA DEVI KURNIASARI (214210447)