Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION TO GEARS
TYPES OF GEAR AND ARRANGEMENTS
TYPES OF GEAR FAILURE
IDENTIFICATION OF GEAR FAILURE
MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES
PREVENTIVE ACTIVITIES
CASE STUDY
CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTI
ON
Rotating machine part having cut teeth
Widely used where change in transmitting of torque with varying speed, direction
of shaft alignment, or direction of rotation are required
Simple machine that create a mechanical advantage through the gear ratio
Parallel Shaft Alignments
TYPES OF GEARS
ON THE BASIS OF SHAFT ALIGNMENT
1. Spur Gears
- Noisier (Single line of contact
between teeth)
- Crushers, Aircraft Engine etc
2. Helical Gears
- Quieter (multiple lines of
contact)
- Conveyers and Elevators Intersecting shafts alignment
1. Bevel Gears
- Costlier
- Hand Drills
1. Worm Gear
- High shock load -Low efficiency-
lower horse power applications
- secondary braking system
- Gates and Guitar
TYPES OF GEAR TRAINS
• Profile Error
-Deviation of the actual tooth profile from the ideal involute profile
Gear Errors Cont.
• Runout Error and Eccentricity
• Radial runout
- Measured along a perpendicular to the axis of rotation
E.g.: spur gear with an offset Centre.
• Axial Runout
- Measured parallel to the axis of rotation
E.g.: drill chuck not holding the drill exactly in line with the
axis.
FAILURE IN GEARS AND GEAR DRIVES
MAJOR PROBLEMS:
MINOR PROBLEMS: Lack of attention to the minor problems
Oil leaks can result in the following typical major
problems :
Ingress of dirt
Bearing failure
Water contamination
Gear tooth damage
Oil starvation
Rust contamination
Overheating
Mechanical looseness
Coupling misalignment
Bearing bore wear
Shaft damage
COMMON GEAR FAILURE MODE
WEAR FAILURE
Loss of material from the
contacting surface of gear
teeth
Normal Wear
Slow loss of metal from the contacting Abrasive Wear
surfaces without affecting the Surface injury caused by fine particles
performance within the expected life of passing through the gear
gears
COMMON GEAR FAILURE MODES
Figure Borescope
PREVENTION:
1. Identify source of abrasive wear marks
2. Regular visual inspection of gearbox
3. Change lubrication oil (if necessary) Figure Oil Debris Sensor
3. SURFACE FATIGUE (PITTING)
• Major cause of gear failure accounting for nearly 60% of the gear failures
• Pitting is the formation of craters on the gear tooth surface
• Craters are formed due to the high amount of compressive contact stresses in the gear surface occurring during transmission of the
torque or in simple terms due to compressive fatigue on the gear tooth surface.
2. Destructive Pitting:
• Characterized by large pits
• Stress concentration is formed on the surface adjacent to the pits, and further destruction occurs
• No maintenance possible
4. BENDING FATIGUE
• The most common form of tooth breakage is by bending fatigue.
• If a particular tooth is subjected to a higher load than it is designed to transmit, either by shock loading, misalignment or
bad manufacture, the tooth is subjected to a higher bending moment as it passes through mesh.
4. BENDING FATIGUE
Corrective Maintenance
actions log
IDENTIFICATION OF FAILURE
Lubrication Vibration
Thermography
analysis analysis
• Check lubricant from the • Measuring vibration • Measuring of the
gear assembly regularly signature
• Amount of impurities in
temperature
• Helps to localize the • Suitable test for running
lubricants
• Quality of lubricant point of failure systems
IDENTIFICATION OF FAILURE
Greasing
Methods of Lubrication
1. Grease Lubrication
Replacement and
Proper Installation Repairs
• Highly worn out gears are replaced
• Use of appropriate gears with standard spare parts
• Proper meshing of gears • In case of minor surface defects, gears
• are grinded
Proper Alignments of shafts
• Must be carried out by professional
• No loose parts and components under clean and controlled
environment
Mounting and Dismounting of Gear
CASE STUDY: Diagnosing a Low-speed Gearbox Problem
Corrective maintenance
https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/27271/Low-speed-gearbox-problem
Problem Identification
• Lubricating oil in the gearbox was regularly subjected to analysis and the last report
stated that there were iron particles in the oil
• The maintenance supervisor asked if maintenance engineer could determine the source
of oil contamination
Fault Detection
• The first thing the maintenance team did is fault detection by examining the vibration
spectra measured near the bearings.
• The spectra looked normal, without the evidence of bearing tones, so team suspected
the noise was coming more of the gears
• Problem shifted to identify the faulty gear, so as to allow the maintenance effort to
proceed without delay.
Fault Detection Cont’d…
• In order to detect fault in the gears, the team decided to perform synchronous averaging of gearbox
vibration signature
• This involves the use of a tachometer-derived synchronizing trigger in the vibration analyzer to
collect of series of waveform samples that are averaged together. The important part of this is that
the beginning of each time record must occur at exactly the same time in the rotation of the gear.
• When the team did synchronous averaging of each two bull gears, there was no indication of any
defect in the waveform, but when same test is performed in the pinion, waveform was different
saying there was obvious area on the gear where the meshing with bull gears was very noisy and
non-uniform
Fault Isolation
• On looking the data, team called for an inspection of the gear; removed the access plate and looked
at the gears
• Found that the keyway in the pinion shaft wad badly worn such that the gear could be rotated back
and forth on the shaft by about one-half of a tooth at the edge of the gear
• There was no visible clearance between shaft and the bore of pinion.
Fault Elimination
• The team called one of the engineers at the gearbox factory and described the situation.
• The engineer explained problem occurred during the installation when the interference fit
between pinion and the shaft was too loose.
• The shaft and pinion was replaced quickly after looking for the standard preventing
catastrophic failure along with proper installation method unlike previous installation
Lubrication methods
Case study
References
https://khkgears.net/new/gear_knowledge/gear_technical_reference/lubrication-of-gears.html
https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Gear-measuring+Instruments
https://www.accelix.com/community/proactive-maintenance/what-is-proactive-maintenance/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/gear-accuracy
https://www.geartechnology.com/subjects/runout/
https://www.mobiusinstitute.com/site2/item.asp?LinkID=8030&iVibe=1&sTitle=Eccentricity
Any Queries…………