You are on page 1of 17

MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS

MINI PROJECT
By,
Anjum Samira
Mohammed Saqlain Khan
Joysee Jenee Toppo
Sabrina Nalakath
Rohan Bhajanka
BRITANNIA ( Monopolistic company)

 Britannia is an Indian food-products corporation based in Bangalore, India.


 Started in 1892, in a non descript house in Calcutta, with an initial investment of Rs. 295.
 It sells its Britannia and Tiger brands of biscuit throughout India.
 The company’s principle activity is the manufacture and sale of biscuits, bread, rusk, cakes and
diary products.
 First bakery company in India to remove transfats from its biscuits.
 Britannia innovates for strong presence in health and nutrition space living upto its credo “Eat
healthy and Think better”.
NIKE (Oligopoly Company)

 Nike is an American multinational corporation, established in Eugene, Oregon in 1964 as Blue


Ribbon Sports.
 It is engaged in designing and worldwide marketing and selling of footwear, apparel,
equipment and accessories.
 It owns Converse, Hurley, Umbro and Jordan brands.
 Nike is the world’s leading supplier of Athletic Shoes and apparel and also a major
manufacturer of sports equipment.
 It also holds substantial popularity in the leisure and casual products.
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)

• Help people enjoy life through healthy • To make a profit for the shareholders.
snacking. • To bring inspiration and innovation to every
• Make delicious and enjoyable food. athlete in the world.
• Make accessible to all people, anytime, • Minimize environmental footprint, transform
anywhere and everyday. manufacturing and unleash human potential.
• To be the lowest cost producer in the market. • To improve quality and convenience of
• To become largest volume player in the bakery footwear, clothing, through introduction of
industry. new technologies and development.
• To promote products as fashion wear, not just
sports wear.
MARKET STRUCTURE

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)


• One seller controlling the production •Many sellers in the market
• Absolute product differentiation •Similarity of products
• Freedom of entry and exit in the market •High barriers to entry in the market
• Imperfect competition •Prefers not to compete through price wars
• Economic profits in short run only, normal rather compete in other ways such as
profits in the long run advertising product differentiation and barriers.
• Lack of perfect knowledge •Potential for economic profits in both short
• Less control over price run and long run.
•Well known producers.
•High price setting power.
Monopolistic graph for Britannia Oligopoly graph for Nike
MARKET SHARE

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)


• Between 1998 & 2001, the company’s sales • Nike’s shares jumped more than 6% in early
grew at a compound annual rate of 16% trading, hitting a record of $92.79.
against the market, and operating profits • The stock had last hit an intraday high of $90
reached 18%. on April 18.
• More recently the company has been growing • It closed Tuesday, ahead of the earnings report,
at 27%, a year, compared to the industry’s at $87.18
growth rate of 20%. • Nike shares have climbed more than 17% this
• At present 90% of Britannia’s annual revenue year, giving the company a market cap of about
of Rs 22 billion comes from biscuits. $136.6 billion.
• Britannia has an estimated market share of
38%.
BRITANNIA PRODUCTS

Vita marie Gold


Fruit cake
Britannia toned milk
Bourbon

Tiger glucose Britannia Curd

Whole wheat bread


Good day
Little hearts

Britannia ghee
Britannia 50 50

Pure magic
Britannia butter
Britannia rusk
NIKE’S PRODUCTS

 Nike produces a wide range of sports equipment such as track running shoes, jerseys,
shorts, cleats, baselayers etc. for a wide range of sports including track and field, baseball,
icehockey, tennis, basketball and cricket etc.
PRODUCTION PROCESS

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)

Making dough by mixing the ingredients Cutting of leather & rubber parts

Sewing the cut parts on the sole of the shoe


Fermentation

Preparing the sole through stock fitting


Giving the shape
Preparation attachment of shoe uppers to the sole (by means of
lasting)
Baking the Raw biscuits
The shoe heel is sharped into the final form

Testing
Finishing

Packaging & supply


Attaching of accessories (like company ribbons)
REVENUE

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)

• Biscuit maker Britannia industries Ltd on • NIKE revenue for the quarter ending Aug 31, 2019
Wednesday reported a 11.82% jump in profit for the was $10.660B ,a 7.16% increase year-over-year
year at 294.27 crore for the quarter ended March 31.
• NIKE revenue for the 12 months ending August
• Total income for the fourth quarter stood at 2860.75
crore up 10.8% from the same quarter in the
31,2019 was $39.829B, a 6.85% increase year-
corresponding year. over-year.
• For the full year the company reported consolidated • NIKE annual revenue for 2019 was $39.117B, a
revenue of Rs 11,261.12 crore while net profit stood 7% increase from 2018.
at Rs 1,155.46 crore.
PRICING STRATEGY

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)


• Value-based pricing strategy: By using this strategy,
• Competition pricing: Britannia set a price which is
reasonable when compared with competitors. Nike considers consumer perception about the value of
• Product line pricing: Pricing the different products within its customers.
the same product line @ different price points. • This value is used to determine the maximum prices
• Bundle pricing: Bundles a group of products at a reduced that consumers are willing to pay for the company’s
price when providing the family packs. sports, shoes, apparel & equipment.
• Value-based pricing: Provide in the good quality product & • Premium pricing strategy: It involves high prices,
good service for the good price. based on a premium branding strategy that establishes
• Mainly focuses on the middle class & lower middle class Nike products as higher in quality & value than
families. Therefore, the britannia products will range from competing products.
Rs5 to Rs 40 only. • Therefore, Nike successfully uses its pricing strategies
• The pricing strategy along with the distribution has been so to maximize its profits while emphasizing high value in
strong, that people buy these products even on railway profiting its products and brand.
stations while travelling, instead of buying local snacks.
MARKETING STRATEGIES

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)


• A strong quality of the product & customer • Product design & quality innovation.
satisfaction. • Use IT and social media for customer
• A growing relationship with customer & connection & engagement.
customer retention. • Focus on inspiring customers & athletes.
• Focus on competitors activity. • Sustaining competitive advantage based on
• A growing emphasis on global thinking and costs i.e; the company minimizes the
local marketing planning. production costs to maximize profitability
• Promotional strategies such as making or reduce selling prices.
advertisement according to the convenience
of the people and the features of the
product.
DEMAND FACTORS

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)


• Income level: Income of the customer who wants quality • Changes in income levels: This factor indicates that people
biscuits in low price. would like to consume more money when the number is higher.
As their income level increases so does their demand for it.
• Age & population: Fruit rolls are demanded by the • Taste & preferences: The factors such as quality, design, brand,
children whereas Good day, marie gold etc are basically for fashion & preference in sports shoes have affected the consumer
more mature people. Little hearts are demanded more by before purchasing Nike shoes and those factors have caused
youngsters. changes in the demand curve.
• Consumer taste & prefernces: A consumer has his own • Changes in price of related goods-Non price determinant:
choices for biscuits they eat what they like most and it all There are several football shoe industries that might affect the
depends on their own taste & preference and utility to demand of Nike football shoe. For instance, Adidas is a
spend money. competitive substitute to Nike where if the price of adidas shoe
• Cost: Britannia biscuits form a common product increases the demand for Nike’s shoe decreases.
• Advertising: If NIKE were to make a successful advertising
irrespective of rich & poor consumers. They are available
for a price as low as Rs 5 making it affordable for all campaign for football shoes, they will attract new consumers
and encourage existing ones to increase their demand for Nike.
sections of the society.
• Expectations: When people expect that the value of
britannia’s biscuits will rise, their demand for it rises.
SUPPLY FACTORS

Britannia (Monopolistic) Nike (Oligopoly)


• Cost of production: The cost of producing biscuits is • Cost of production: The cost to make the shoes will be
cheaper making it affordable for everyone. higher which means there will be less amount of shoes
• Technology: Some of the trends impacting Britannia produced, but the price will go up because they will not
industries are E-commerce & related infrastructure have as much product as they did while making shoes for a
development, property rights & protection of cheaper price in Asia.
technology, technology transfer & liscensing issues for • Technology: Increasing R&D investment among firms,
britannia biscuits etc. rapid technological obsolescence, widespread use of
• Government policies: The govt is adhering to all rules mobile technology.
and regulations under WTO norms. • Government policies: Improving employment law,
• Climate change: If the supply chain is not flexible it expanding consumer law and expanding health & safety
can lead to failure of shipments from one part of the regulations in developing countries.
world getting delayed because of sudden climate shift. • Weather conditions: Climate change affects supply
chains and the appropriateness of Nike sports shoes and
apparel in certain regions.
• Goal of producers-profit: In order to achieve profit, they
manufacture superior products, maintaining the integrity
of the global operation in area of design of the product.
CONCLUSION

Britannia is a monopolistic company because of its differentiated products, there are no


barriers to entry or exit in the market, has limited market power, less control over price and it
is a non-price competition (advertising).

Nike is an oligopoly because there are multiple producers creating the same type of products,
high barriers to enter into the market and has a lot of price setting power.

Britannia had projected the profit at Rs 282 crore. The consolidated revenue rose 6% YoY to
Rs 2,677 crore for the quarter ended June 2019.

Nike reported revenue of $10.2 billion in Q4 2019, making a growth of 4% over $9.8 billion
in Q4 2018.

You might also like