Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ATTACH Failure
PDP Activation Failure
WAP Failure
FTP Failure
Other Failures
Overview ATTACH Failure
Attach
AttachFailure
FailureFeatures Attach
Features Attachsuccess
successrate
rateisislow
lowand
anddelay
delayisislong
long
Weak coverage
Cell has co-channel interference, adjacent interference or
external interference
Radio Environment Cell congestion causes untimely response to attach request
Failure Busy system or slow response impacts logon efficiency
Overview ATTACH Failure
Failure
FailureDescription:
Description: Failure Analysis:
InInone According to signaling flow, BSS is in
onenetwork,
network,subscriber
subscriberfails
failsinin
MS
MSGPRS
GPRSAttach.
Attach. charge of TBF flow establishment, and
MSMSsends
sendsAttach
Attachrequest,
request,then
then then MS exchanges signaling with SGSN;
SGSN
SGSNsends
sendsback
backattach
attachaccept
accept in normal flow, MS sends Attach complete
message,
message,but
butBSC
BSCsends
sendsLLC
LLC to SGSN.
unknown Related BSC data have no problem.
unknowninformation
informationsignaling.
signaling.
From global test we can see that the
same failure occurs in sites controlled by
all BSC that connect with SGSN, so we
Solution:
initially estimate it is SGSN problem.
Turn status of P-TMSI from disable After checking we see modification that
to enable and then the failure is is status of P-TMSI is changed from initial
enable to disable that causes P-TMSI
solved.
can’t allocate and subscriber can’t use
GPRS
ATTACH Failure ATTACH Failure
ATTACH Failure
PDP Activation Failure
WAP Failure
FTP Failure
Other Failure
Overview PDP Activation Failure
PDP
PDPActivation Low
Activation Lowsuccess
successrate
rateof
ofPDP
PDPactivation,
activation,PDP
PDP
Failure
FailureFeatures
Features activation
activationfailure,
failure,long
longPDP
PDPactivation
activationtime
time
Problem: PDP activation failure is caused by less 20281AGCH after reselect from
20022 to 20281.
Solution: control 20281 coverage extension and increase number of 20281AGCH.
PDP Activation Failure PDP Activation Failure
Problem: PDP activation delay is occasionally too long in CQT. 7 abnormal dela
ys occur in 100 times PDP activations in 10 nodes, which is shown in the followin
g tables.
PDP Activation Failure PDP Activation Failure
PDP Activation Failure PDP Activation Failure
Failure From the test result we can see that time is mainly consumed below Gb interface as well as betwe
en Radius and WAP gateway. The sixth time consumption between GGSN and Radius is relativel
analysis:
y long, because the first Accounting Request message sent by GGSN isn’t received by WAP gate
way due to the lost of Accounting Request message in transfer or Radius abnormal processing.
The other six failures are due to too long time consumption below Gb interface as well as betwee
n Radius and WAP gateway. GGSN sends Accounting Request message to Radius, waits for resp
onse from Radius and starts up corresponding wait timer; corresponding WAP gateway doesn’t r
esponse after receiving Accounting Request message. Then wait timer is overtime because GGS
N doesn’t receive response, the Accounting Request message, and then GGSN resends Accountin
g Request message; this time corresponding WAP gateway gives response and GGSN receives A
ccounting Response message transmitted by Radius, and GGSN begins to response to MS PDP a
ctivation request.
TBF resource is released due to overtime timer caused by too long time consumption on Gi interf
ace, therefore MS reestablishes TBF while receiving PDP activation accept message, which furth
er increase time delay on radio interface.
Therefore we can see that the fundamental reason for too long time delay in PDP activation is too
slow WAP gateway response.
Contents
ATTACH Failure
PDP Activation Failure
WAP Failure
FTP Failure
Other Failures
Overview WAP Failure
WAP Failure Reasons:
WAP Failure Features:
Radio coverage problem, interference, cell res
low success display rate of WAP front page; election failure;
long display time of WAP front page; Data configuration mistake on two ports of G
b interface;
low success refresh rate of WAP pages;
Too long WAP gateways connection;
long refresh time of WAP front page.
WAP parameter setting mistake.
Problem: through analysis we see RLC data retransfer ratio is high, Gb link l
oad reaches as high as 64% in test period from OMC statistic data that causes
low download rate.
Solution: readjust NSEI to decrease Gb link load and improve GPRS CQT d
ownload rate.
WAP Logon Failure WAP Failure
Problem: WAP logon test in ** hotel, after tracking Gb interface we figure out th
at on uplink MS sends Get (URL=http://wap.monternet.com) and network replies a
PDU with the contents of “Your request for a service could not be fulfilled, please t
ry again or contact your operator if the Failure persists”. This problem is caused b
y failures in moternet server.
Solution: require cooperation from core network engineer through negotiation.
Too Long WAP Logon
WAP Failure
and Refresh Delay
Too Long WAP Logon
WAP Failure
and Refresh Delay
Attach request
Problem: through signalling analysis
P
context request Access Request R prolongs between CONNECT to CONNE
GPRS A
C
U
核 心
网
Access Accept D
I
CT REPLY and between GET to REPLY;
Accounting Req U
S GET request needs to retransmitted and
Active PDP
Accounting Res.
there is even no response; long signaling
Wap
context accept
Connect
网
关
delay occurs especially between GET an
Connect reply
d REPLY and sometimes even reaches t
Ack
get
get
ens of seconds that largely impacts MS a
M
Reply
Reply
I
S
SP
ccessing rate to WAP;
Ack C
Solution: core network engineer
optimize WAP gateway.
Feint Event WAP Failure
Problem: after MS gets required webpage, WAP gateway replies “URL NOT
EXIST” message, which is the response of WAP gateway after it receives “servi
ce temporarily interrupted” message from SP server.
Solution: this test will be deleted in CDS by processing software and isn’t rega
rded as an attempt test.
Contents
ATTACH Failure
PDP Activation Failure
WAP Failure
FTP Failure
Other Failures
Overview FTP Failure
Network resource
utilization status
Impact of C/ I to data
Impact of coding mode transfer
Problem: frequent cell reselection during FTP download process that causes
long-time suspend of TBF. Cell’s busy TCH makes it’s hard for MS to apply PS
channel and average download rate is only 8.11kbit/s 。
Solution: expand 30553 and 30152 statistic PS channel, adjust
30553RXLEVACCESSMIN from 10 to 14.
FTP Download Failure FTP Failure
Problem: PDCH that MS obtained isn’t stable and PS is in great demand that c
auses slow DL FTP rate.
Solution: increase the number of CI2631 statistic PS channel.
BS_CV_MAX Set
FTP Failure
Unreasonably
Problem description:
Data transfer rate in one cell in one GPRS network is relatively low; the cell is in s
uburb and has low traffic.
Failure analysis
GPRS radio parameter BS_CV_MAX is set as 15; the area has low traffic and no
channel congestion. BS_CV_MAX is GPRS cell option parameter that helps system
to know in advance when MS ends uplink transfer and improve uplink resource utiliz
ation ratio. If value of BS_CV_MAX is set too low, MS may retransmit RLC block dat
a before network sends back confirmation message and radio resource occupation r
atio may be too high; if it is set too high, then sliding window program efficiency will
be too low and data transfer rate will get slower.
Solution:
Decrease set value of BS_CV_MAX to improve retransfer ratio. After adjust the v
alue of BS_CV_MAX to 6, transfer rate is improved obviously.
FTP Download Rate Low FTP Failure
FTP Download Rate Low FTP Failure
Problem: in repetition test we figure out that in one same place, on 52484, C
1=25, C2 = 21; the status from 15:40:33.764 to 15:53:586 lasts 20s and then t
he value of C2 raises to 53. The venue of repetition test is an intersection wher
e large car flow exists and the roads are congested, so PET = 20s that we pre
viously set is far more lesser than the time that we stick in the traffic jam.
Solution: set the cell’s PET as 200s and then the possibility of cell reselection
decreases greatly.
FTP Download Failure FTP Failure
FTP transfer drop goes with RAU Failure every time pass through RAC
area. After detailed analysis, we figure out data error on SGSN is the reason
for this route update failure.
These three parameters are related to GPRS route update:
(1) home location of each MSC on SGSN
(2) home location of each BSC in MSC
(3) RAC area that each cell belongs to
Normal GPRS MS route update can only be insured when the above 3
parameters comply with hardware in the existing network.
FTP Download Rate Instable FTP Failure
Problem:
In one area subscriber complains that FTP download rate varies greatly, with
the difference of more than tens of Kilobits within a very short period of time;
The area is covered completely by Cell A, and this complaint isn’t appeared in
other cells, so we mainly check the difference between Cell A and other cells;
We figure out Cell A’s T3168 is set as 4000ms but that of other cells is set as
1000ms.
Solution:
The value of T3168 is set so high that data transfer rate is relatively high in
normal transfer;
MS sends Require Packet Resource message as the response when it
receives Packet Uplink Assignment message; T3168 is started up when the
response is sent; MS doesn’t respond Packet Downlink Assignment message
when T3168 is running, therefore no downlink data are transmitted during the
time that is equal to the value of T3168, which makes low transfer rate.
Modify T3168 from 4000ms to 1000ms and then FTP download rate is
stabilized and the problem is solved.
Weak Coverage FTP Failure
A -103 -100 8 26 0 23
B -80 -100 8 8 0 28
C -84 -100 8 10 0 26
Conclusion:
The two kinds of FTP download failures mentioned previously are all caus
ed by FTP failure that appears on TCP/IP transport layer and application la
yer instead of caused by GPRS network layer failure.
From the test software we can see that data on application layer can’t be r
eceived in the two situations while logging on FTP server, and finally FTP do
wnload fail is displayed due to overtime and it is counted as FTP download f
ailure once.
Contents
ATTACH Failure
PDP Activation Failure
WAP Failure
FTP Failure
Other Failures
PING Failure 1 Other Failures
Problem: low cell’s C/I causes high BLER (cell BCCH C/I = 5.9). After chec
king planning data we figure out beehive 8800, 7660 and 8750 use the same
BCCH.
Solution: control the coverage of 8800, 7660 and 8750, adjust frequencies o
f 8800, 7660 and 8750.
MMS Transfer Failure Other Failures
Problem:
The transfer success rate of MMS that larger than 15Kbits sent by Panasonic GD
88 mobile phone is relatively low; and the rate is almost 0 when the MMS is larger t
han 30Kbits. But if using mobile phone of other brands, such as NOKIA 6100, the l
arge MMS can be sent both normally and fast.
Solution:
After recording signaling on GB interface we figure out Panasonic EB-GD88 mob
ile phone doesn’t completely support GSM04.60 criterion (GPRS RLC/MAC layer cr
iterion); it can’t support completely the site parameter settings that BS_CV_MAX=1
3, 14 or 15, which is allowed in GSM04.60 criterion, and it only supports BS_CV_M
AX=1, …, 12. We suggest modifying the default value of BS_CV_MAX in the whole
network from 15 to 6.
MMS Receiving Failure Other Failures
Problem: MS sends Get request on uplink for MMS to MMSC, but Cause val
ue in the network Reply message is 404: Not Found; it may be because MS do
esn’t pick MMS in time and MMSC deletes it after waiting for a while, then net
work replies Not Found when MS requires MMS.
MMS Transfer Failure Other Failures
Problem description:
Some subscribers reflect the network accessing rate is slow by u
sing GPRS network card.
Failure analysis:
The subscriber’s SIM card classification is high and confirmation
mechanism is used on LLC layer, so network accessing rate is slow
ed.
Solution:
Check the subscriber’s PS QoS, reliability; 3 represents unconfir
med, 1 represents confirmed. GPRS network accessing rate accele
rates after mode has been modified as unconfirmed.
BVC Reset and Block
Other Failures
Failure
Problem description:
BSC Gb interface connects successfully with SGSN on NS layer, but c
onfigured PS channel’s status is “BVC reset and block”.
Failure analysis:
After checking signaling, RAC is reported mistaken. Check parameter
settings of BSC and SGSN then find out the previous two parameters a
mong the four parameters of RAC in SGSN configuration are DEC, whic
h should be HEX in SGSN configuration.
Solution:
Modify the parameter to HEX and then signaling go back to normal. W
e shall pay special attention that no DEC parameters but HEX paramete
rs shall be used in SGSN configuration.