VOCABULARY ERROR ANALYSIS

ON SPEAKING PERFORMANCE IN
DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BY VII A1
GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI
4 SINGARAJA IN ACADEMIC YEAR
2019/2020

Brenda Khanadi
1612021252
 What will
discuss?
01 Introduction
Background and Research Question.
05
Conclusion and Suggestion 02 Theoretical Review and Empirical Review
Review of Related Error Analysis

04 03 Research Method
Research Finding Research design
Finding Research subject
Discussion Research object
Implication Research instrument
The procedure of data collection
Data analysis
Triangulation
 Introduction

Language as intercessor.
The purpose of
Speaking skill. Micro skill in learning
English.

Issue of low
speaking
I performance.
Vocabulary is
essential case.

Speaking problems.
Research Questions

1. What kind of vocabulary error are committed on

students’ speaking performance by VII A1 grade students
of SMP Negeri 4 Singaraja?

2. What source of error is committed on students’

vocabulary error in speaking performance by VII A1
grade students of SMP Negeri 4 Singaraja?
 Theoretical review

Error analysis is a term use for

Speaking is most challenging skill to
non-native speaker (Richards,
be mastered (Nunas, 1991).
1985).

Vocabulary error types: omission, addition,

misformation and misordering (Dulay,
1982).

Source of Error are intralingual error

and interlingual error (Richard,
1974).
 Empirical review

Topic Recent Studies Results

Error Analysis in the Descriptive Text of Vocational High School
Ilmu (2019)
Students.

Vocabulary Phettongkam (2017)

Grammatical Errors in Spoken English of Undergraduate Thai Leaners
Error in a Communicative Business English Course.

Amin (2014) Lexical Error made by students of the Junior High School.

Hervina (2014) Grammatical Errors in Speaking Made by the Third Year English
Department Students at STKIP Abdi Pendidikan Payakumbuh.

Fadhila, Hawa Errors In Speaking English Made By Students Of English Department

(2013) Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.
UNDERLYING THEORY
Error Analysis & Source of
Error
Richards (1985)
Richard (1974)
Error analysis is a way
Source of Error types
identifying, describing, Dulay (1982) are interlingual error
and explaining error.
Error analysis types are and intralingual error.
omission, addition,
misformation and
misordering.
 RESEARCH
METHOD
RESEARCH
Design Subject Object
This study will use The subject are VII A1 grade Vocabulary error and
qualitative method. students in Junior High School at source of error.
SMP Negeri 4 Singaraja.
Research
Instrument Procedure of Data
Data Analysis Triangulation
The researcher, Collection
Data Reduction, Data Method triangulation
observation checklist, Collecting Data, Display, Conclusion
interview guide. Identifying Error, Drawing/Verification
Classifying Error ,
Evaluating Error.
 Research
Table 4. 4 The Finding Types of Vocabulary Errors in Students’ Speaking
Distribution
Table 4. 5 The Distribution Source of Error
Performance
Table 4. 3 The Distribution of Types Vocabulary Errors
No The Types of Error f Percentage
No Source
No Types of Vocabulary
of Error Types Error
f f
Percentage Percentage
1. Adjective 1 2,86%
1. Omission 15 42,86%
2. 1.Verb TenseInterlingual Error 9 11
39,13% 31,43%

3. 2. Conjunction Addition 39 8,57%

25,71%
4. 2.Noun-Plural
Intralingual Error 14 60,87%
4 11,43%
3. Misformation 6 17,14%
5. Linking Verb 5 14,28%

6. 4. Preposition Total
Misordering 23 100%
75 14,29%
20%

7. Incorrect of Noun 4 11,43%

Total 35 100%
Total 35 100%
 Discussion

The analysis kind ofImplication

vocabulary error made by students and
investigating the source of the error in speaking performance are
significant to be conducted.
 Vocabulary error and source of error means to
support learning process more innovative which
consider
Conducting directly
research to students’
study is part ofproblems.
aiding speaking skill such as
analysing errors and identify the source of error.
 Invite the students’ thoughts about their
learning process in class freely.
It found that there were different type of vocabulary distribution in
this research.
 Suggestion
Conclusion

1. Students in VII
 Classroom A1 grade
learning of SMP
process Negeri 4to
recommended
Singaraja
haveacademic year activities
more varieties 2019/2020 andmade 4
materials
types of vocabulary
that the outline error
arein fully
speaking
involved the
performance
students.of descriptive text.

2. More than
 The 50% percentage
students need to haveof the subject
mind-set change
who made
abouterror omitted
learning the vocabulary
English is not fun,error
not
as the fact of Intralingual
challenging, side and
not important, (39%) ofand
not exciting, the
students who made error showed that they had
difficult.
Interlingual error.
Discussion