Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supplier APQP Process Training (In-Depth)
Supplier APQP Process Training (In-Depth)
Leadership
1 Engagement is Critical
© 2014 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.
12
APQP Benefits:
Manufacturing process functions that are clearly planned,
validated, documented and communicated that result in:
• Robust and reliable designs
• Reduced process variation
CONC
• Enhanced confidence in supplier’s
capabilities
• Better controlled process changes
• New part
• Engineering change(s)
• Durable Tooling: transfer, replacement, refurbishment, or
additional
• Tooling inactive > one year
• Correction of discrepancy
• Change to optional construction or material
• Sub-supplier or material source change
• Change in part processing
• Parts produced at a new or additional location
PPAP is required with any significant
change to product or process!
• Approved
• The part meets all Eaton requirements
• Supplier is authorized to ship production quantities of the part
• Interim Approval
• Permits shipment of part on a limited time or piece quantity
basis
• Rejected
• The part does not meet Eaton requirements, based on the
production lot from which it was taken and/or accompanying
documentation
Production quantities shall
not be shipped before Eaton
Approval
© 2014 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.
26
Eaton PPAP Process
• Includes:
• Component drawings
• Assembly drawings
• Bill of Materials
• Referenced engineering specifications
• Material specifications
• Performance or test specifications
• Ensures manufacturer has the complete design record at the
correct revision levels
• This requirement may be satisfied by attaching the “ballooned”
design record to the Production Feasibility Agreement (PFA) –
located in the PPAP Workbook
• Some Eaton businesses may use an alternate approach
• Provide potential cause and effect relationships for the basic design of
the product
• Helps to plan design needs for:
• Materials selection
• Tolerance stack-up
• Software
• Interfaces
• DVP&R (life cycle tests)
• Employs R.P.N rating system
• High R.P.N’s and Severity> 8 need recommended Corrective Actions (CA)
• PROLaunch element
• Initial DFMEA in Phase 2
• Complete DFMEA in Phase 3
• May be “Family” based
Legend:
Operation Transportation Inspection Delay Storage
STEP
• Team Effort:
• Engineers
• Operators
• Supervisors
• Maintenance
• Supply Chain
• Possible Inputs to Mapping:
• Engineering specifications
• Lead time requirements
• Target manufacturing costs
• Operator experience
• Observation
• Brainstorming
• Reviewers Checklist
Process Flow must include all phases of the process
• Receiving
• Storage/ material handling
• Manufacturing
• Offline inspections and checks
• Assembly
• Testing
• Shipping
Should include abnormal handling processes
• Scrap
• Rework
• Extended Life Testing
May also include Transportation
Key Date
ORGANIZATION
Process Step
Current Current
Classification
Occurrence
Detection
/ Function Potential Potential Potential
Severity
Process Process
RPN
• Objective or Purpose
Failure Effect(s) Causes(s)
Mode of Failure of Failure Controls Controls
Prevention Detection
Requirements
controls.
Function.
Customer unable to
Assemble Hardware Kit Bad seal (B) install product, due 8 Bagger error 2 Work Instructions Visual Inspection 8
to missing hardware.
• List all credible failure modes or ways the process/operation can fail in the
PFMEA document before addressing failure effects and failure causes
• In each instance, the assumption is made that the failure could occur, but
will not necessarily occur
• The failure mode:
• “… is the manner in which the process could potentially fail to meet the process
requirements and/or design intent.”
• Is a description of nonconformance
• Assumes incoming parts are correct
• Considers subsequent operations
• Typical failure modes could be, but are not limited to:
• Bent • Cracked • Tool worn
• Open circuited • Improper setup • Handling Damage
• Dirty • Burred
• Binding • Deformed
TIPS
• There should be at least one failure effect for each failure mode.
• Effects should be specific, clear, and leave no doubt to the uninformed reviewer.
© 2014 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.
49
Potential Effect(s) of Failure
Class
Identify special product or
process characteristics
Potential Causes
For each Failure Mode,
determine the possible
cause of the failure.
TIP
• There should be at least one potential cause for each failure mode.
Current Controls
For each potential
cause, list the current
method used for
preventing and/or
detecting failure.
TIPS
• This step in the FMEA begins to identify initial shortcomings or gaps in the current control plan.
• If a procedure exists, enter the document number.
• If no current control exists, list as “none.” There may not be both preventive and detection controls.
© 2014 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.
54
PFMEA - Step 6
Assign Detection
Assign Severity (How easily can the
(How serious is the cause or failure
effect if it fails?) mode be detected?)
Assign
Occurrence
(How likely is
the cause to
occur?)
Criteria: Criteria:
Rank Effect Severity of Effect on Product Effect Severity of Effect on Process
(Customer Effect) (Manufacturing / Assembly Effect)
Failure to Meet Potential failure mode affects safe Product operation and/or involves Failure to Meet May Endanger Operator (machine or assembly)
10
Safety and/or noncompliance with government regulation without warning Safety and/or without warning
Regulatory Potential failure mode affects safe Product operation and/or involves Regulatory May Endanger Operator (machine or assembly) with
9 Requirements Requirements
noncompliance with government regulation with warning warning
Loss of primary function (Product inoperable, does not affect safe 100% of product may have to be scrapped. Line
8 Loss or Major Disruption
Product operation) shutdown or stop ship.
Degradation of
A portion of the production run may have to be
Primary Degradation of primary function (Product operable, but at reduced Significant
7 scrapped. Deviation from primary process including
Function level of performance) Disruption
decrease line speed or added manpower.
Loss or Loss of secondary function (Product operable, but comfort / 100% of production run may have to be reworked off
6
Degradation of convenience functions inoperable) line and accepted
High Disruption
Secondary Degradation of secondary function (Product operable, but comfort / A portion of production run may have to be reworked
5 Function convenience functions at reduced level of performance) off line and accepted
Appearance or audible Noise, Product operable, item does not 100% of production run may have to be reworked in
4
conform and noticed by most customers (>75%) Moderate station before it is processed.
Appearance or audible Noise, Product operable, item does not Disruption A portion of production run may have to be reworked
3 Annoyance
conform and noticed by most customers (50%) in station before it is processed.
Appearance or audible Noise, Product operable, item does not
2 Minor Disruption Slight inconvenience to process operation or operator.
conform and noticed by most customers (<25%)
Criteria:
Likelihood of
Rank Occurrence of Cause - DFMEA
Failure
(Incidents per Item / Products)
2 per Thousand
6
1 in 500
0.5 per Thousand
5 Moderate
1 in 2,000
0.1 per Thousand
4
1 in 10,000
0.01 per Thousand
3
1 in 100,000
Low
=< 0.001 per Thousand
2
1 in 1,000,000
9 Very Remote Not Likely to Detect at any Stage X Failure Mode and/or Error (Cause) is not easily detected (eg random audits)
Controls will probably not detect. Failure Mode detection post processing by operator through visual tactile audible
8 Remote X
Problem detection post processing. means
Failure Mode detection in-station by operator through visual tactile audible means or
Controls have poor chance of detection
7 Very Low X X post processing through use of attribute gauging (go/no go, manual torque check /
Problem detection at source.
clicker wrench etc.)
Failure Mode detection post processing by operator through variable gauging or in-
Controls might detect.
6 Low X X station by operator through the use of attribute gauging (go/no go, manual torque
Problem detection post processing.
check / clicker wrench etc.)
Failure Mode or Error (Cause) detection in-station by operator through the use of
Controls might detect. variable gauging or by automated controls in-station that will detect discrepant part
5 Moderate X X
Problem detection at source. and notify operator (light buzzer etc.). Gauging performed on set-up and first piece
check (for set-up causes only)
Moderately Controls may detect. Failure Mode detection post processing by automated controls that will detect
4 X X
High Problem detection post processing. discrepant part and lock part to prevent further processing.
Controls have a good chance to detect. Failure Mode detection in-station by automated controls that will detect discrepant
3 High X
Problem detection at source. part and automatically lock part in station to prevent further processing.
Controls almost certain to detect. Error (Cause) detection in-station by automated controls that will detect error and
2 Very High X
Error detection and or problem prevention. prevent discrepant part from being made.
Error (Cause) prevention as a result of fixture design, machine design or part design.
Almost
1 Detection not applicable, error prevention. X discrepant parts cannot be made because item has been error proofed by
Certain
process/product design.
Customer unable to
Assemble Hardware Kit Bad seal (B) install product, due 8 Bagger error 2 Work Instructions Visual Inspection 8 128
to missing hardware.
• Higher RPNs are flags to take effort to reduce the calculated risk
Current Controls
D R S O D R
E P Actions E C E P
Prevent Detect T N Recommended Responsible Actions Taken V C T N
Actions Taken
As actions are identified
SEV, OCC, DET, RPN
and completed, document
in the “Actions Taken” As actions are complete
column. reassess Severity,
Occurrence, and Detection
and recalculate RPN.
1. For each Process Input, determine the ways in which the Process Step
can go wrong (these are Failure Modes)
2. For each Failure Mode associated with the inputs, determine Effects on
the outputs
3. Mark special characteristics (product and process)
4. Identify potential Causes of each Failure Mode
5. List the Current Controls for each Cause
6. Assign Severity, Occurrence and Detection ratings after creating a ratings
key appropriate for your project
7. Calculate RPN
8. Determine Recommended Actions to reduce high risks
9. Take appropriate Actions and Document
10.Recalculate RPNs
11. Revisit steps 7 and 8 to continually reduce risks
C
S l Potential O Current PROCESS Current PROCESS D R S O D R
Process Potential Potential Actions
E a Causes(s) C Controls Controls E P Resp. Actions Taken E C E P
step/Input Failure Mode Failure Effects s Recommended
V s of Failure C - Prevention - - Detection - T N V C T N
Add message to
prompt the
operator that the BPB. October
New prompt and
Operator turns off grease is off. Add 2004 8 3 5 120
sensor
grease, grease not sensor to grease Completed
7 5 Visual inspection 8 280 valve to sense that
pumping, or barrel
Sleeve/bearing empty it is firing.
No grease in
wears out -
bearing sleeve Add new sensors
warranty claim PT. October 2010
to detect pumping New sensors added 8 3 4 96
Completed
of air
Add sensors to Modified equipment
Impropoer grease confirm correct PT. October 2010 and changed
7 2 Visual inspection 8 112 8 2 4 64
volume block used voume block is Completed program to look at
used sensors
Op 35.
Grease not Add new sensors
Test and PT. October 2010
7 pumping or barrel 2 Visual inspection 8 112 to detect pumping New sensors added 8 2 4 64
grease No grease in Premature Completed
empty of air
bearing bearing/sleeve
Add sensors to Modified equipment
(Product Z failure - warranty
Impropoer grease confirm correct PT. October 2010 and changed
only) claim 7 2 Visual inspection 8 112 8 2 4 64
volume block used voume block is Completed program to look at
used sensors
Customer will
Wrong bearing TP- 100% inspection of
not be able to 6 Wrong set-up 2 4 48 0
housing 12 housing in tester
install
Modify program to
PT. December
cosmetic issue prompt operator to Modified program 5 3 7 105
Damage to 2010 Completed
and potential Part mislocated in check orientation
mounting 5 3 100% visual check 8 120
effect on bolt tester fixture Change design of
holes PT. February Installed March
torque fixture and 5 2 7 70
2011 Completed 2011
locators
• Reviewers Checklist
Verify risks are prioritized and high risk items have
identified improvement actions
Make sure that high risk process concerns are carried
over into the control plan
Make sure that all critical failure modes are addressed
• Safety
• Form, fit, function
• Material concerns
• See PPAP Workbook for detailed PFMEA checklist
Process Steps
Begin/Work
Monitor Progress
Monitor Progress Begin/Work
Payment mail not go down staffing and associa
7 room 7 10 490
through Power Yes
Project
Follow DMAIC or
Steering and
Monthly
Finance Approval
and Signature Finance Approval
through Bi-
Weekly Updates
and Monthly
Project
Follow DMAIC or
processes
Financial and Signature
DFSS process Do you Reviews DFSS process
Identify Wire Information not AR balance is Customer or bank Acct identifies problem Poka-Yoke wire transer
Reviews
No have BB/GB to
Assist/Work the
Complete Project
Master Form Will
Generate Yes Complete Project Identify Wire Information not Customer identifies Poka-Yoke wire tran
(Has to be fully
Documented
Contract Master Form Will
Generate
(Has to be fully
Documented)
Customer reference
Transfer supplied past due name didand/or
not include 5 payment
when trying to apply 5 250 process
Contract
line reference 10 account
Yes Is Hard nameinfo on
and/or payment
10 account 5 5 250
Savings > $???
Identify Invoice Checks invoice outstanding (AR it when reviewing thecatch with Provide
statement for each
Project Master Form
Incorrect Invoice shows Customer error Customer might payment stu
Group?
Finance Approval Finance Approval
Identify Invoice Checks not supplied outstanding (AR whenAccttrying to applyproblem with Provide
statement for each
Project Owner Project Owner
Steps
Invoice number Invoice shows Customer error identifies payment stu
Dept BB or MBB Yes Dept BB or MBB
Complete all Does the Complete all not supplied balance does go(AR5
outstanding
10 payment
when trying to apply
5 250 invoice
with statement for e
Documentation Yes No Documentation
including a
(1) Page Close-
Close
Project
Project Involve
>3 Depts.
outside Eng?
Close
Project
including a
(1) Page Close-
down)
balance does go 5 10 payment 5 250 invoice
out Sheet out Sheet
down)
Process FMEA
Process Flowchart
d
i ze s
Pr it p
oc i o r Ste
N es Pr ss
Pr we s k
s ce
oc /R
St
ep Ri r o d
es e s P
ove ls
s vi pr tro
St es
ep d Im on
C
s
Control Plan
© 2014 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.
69
The Control Plan Form
CONTROL PLAN
Prototype Pre-Launch Production
Control Plan Number Key Contact/Phone Date (Orig.) Date (Rev.)
FILE.XLS 555-555-5555 1/1/1996 1/1/1996
Part Number/Latest Change Level Core Team Customer Engineering Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
NUMBER ECL
Part Name/Description Organization/Plant Approval/Date Customer Quality Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
NAME
Organization/Plant Organization Code Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
ORGANIZATION CODE
MACHINE, CHARACTERISTICS METHODS
PART/ PROCESS NAME/ SPECIAL
DEVICE REACTION
PROCESS OPERATION CHAR. PRODUCT/PROCESS EVALUATION/ SAMPLE
JIG, TOOLS CONTROL PLAN
NUMBER DESCRIPTION NO. PRODUCT PROCESS CLASS SPECIFICATION/ MEASUREMENT
FOR MFG. SIZE FREQ. METHOD
TOLERANCE TECHNIQUE
Administrative Section
Identifies part number and description,
supplier, required approval signatures,
and dates.
3 Distinct Phases
1. Prototype – a description of the dimensional measurements and material
and performance tests that will occur during Prototype build.
2. Pre-Launch – a description of the dimensional measurements and material
and performance tests that will occur after Prototype and before full
Production.
3. Production – a comprehensive documentation of product/process
characteristics, process controls, tests, and measurement systems that will
occur during mass production
Automated
Wave Wave Sensor inspection
Soldering solder solder continuity (error Adjust and
2 Connections machine height 2.0 +/- .25 mc check 100% Continuous proofing) retest
Flux Test sampling
concen - lab Segregate
tration Standard #302B environment 1 pc 4 hours x-MR chart and retest
Precision Repeatability
(Variability)
Reproducibility
Measurement
System
Variation
Linearity
Observed Accuracy
Observed (Central Bias
Variation
Variation Location)
Stability
Process
Variation Calibration helps address accuracy
Resolution
Error in Resolution
The inability to detect small
changes.
Possible Cause
Wrong measurement device
selected - divisions on scale
not fine enough to detect
changes.
Possible Cause
Lack of standard operating
procedures (SOP), lack of
training, measuring system
variablilty.
Equipment Variation
Possible Cause
Lack of SOP, lack of training.
Appraiser Variation
2. 2 = 2 0.8862 =
3. 3 = 3 0.5908 =
4. AVE xa= Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (AV)
5. R ra= AV = {(xDIFF x K2)2 - (EV2/nr)}1/2 % AV = 100 (AV/Tol)
6. B 1 = =
7. 2 = =
Automatically calculates x
8. 3 A p p ra i s e rs 2 3
9. AVE b= n = parts r = trials K2 0.7071 0.5231
= =
* D4 =3.27 for 2 trials and 2.58 for 3 trials. UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are
beyond this limit. Identify the cause and correct. Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit as originally used or
discard values and re-average and recompute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations. For information on the theory and constants used in the form see MSA Reference Manual , Fourth edition.
Notes:
1. Select 10 items that represent the full range of long-term process variation
2. Identify the appraisers – they should be operator who normally use the gage
3. If appropriate, calibrate the gage or verify that the last calibration date is valid
4. Open the GR&R VAR(Tol) worksheet in the AIAG Core Tools file to record data, or use
MiniTab
5. Have each appraiser assess each part 3 times preferably in random order (Minitab can
generate a random run order)
6. Input data into the GR&R VAR(Tol) worksheet or MiniTab
7. Enter the number of operators, trials, samples and specification limits
8. Analyze data and review GR&R and PV values
9. Take actions for improvement if necessary.
Objective or Purpose
What is It?
• To show conformance to the
Evidence that dimensional customer part print on dimensions
verifications have been completed and all other noted requirements
and results indicate compliance with
specified requirements When to Use It
• For each unique manufacturing
process (e.g., cells or production
lines and all molds, patterns, or
© 2014 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.
dies
97
Dimensional Results
• Reviewer’s Checklist
All design record specifications (notes, referenced specifications, etc.)
shall be included in the Dimensional Results
• Material and performance specifications results can be reported on the separate
Material, Performance Test Results
Results shall include samples from each tool cavity, manufacturing line,
etc.
Data points should come from PPAP samples included with PPAP
submission
• The agreed upon # of parts from the production run must be shipped to the customer
for verification of form, fit, and function
• Supplier must clearly identify PPAP samples used for dimensional results
Results that do not meet the design specification shall be addressed prior
to PPAP submission
• “Not OK” results typically require changes to the manufacturing process prior to
PPAP submission. In some cases the customer may agree to engineering changes.
Product produced
Product produced Product produced
beyond both
above the below the
Upper and Lower
Upper Spec Limit. Lower Spec Limit.
Spec Limits.
13
12
X=12.64
which there is more chance for a
11 LCL=11.10
process shift. (Guideline: 100-200
10
9 data points.)
0 50 100 150
Observation Number
15
Frequency
10
If not, investigate.
5
0
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Mfg Hours
Bimodal Data
Histogram of Mfg Hours Histogram of Mfg Hours
The shape of your data is 25
Mean
StDev
19.98
1.713
20 Mean
StDev
20.19
18.87
Frequency
Analysis applies. If the 15
10
statistics reference. 0
16 18 20 22 24
0
-15 0 15 30 45 60 75
Mfg Hours Mfg Hours
Capable, Capable,
Centered Not Centered
Green (Good)
>1.67 >1.33
When to Use It
• Prior to tooling for production
IMPORTANT!
Only applies for parts with color, grain,
or surface appearance requirements
COLOR EVALUATION
METALLIC COLOR
COLOR TRISTIMULUS DATA MASTER MASTER MATERIAL MATERIAL HUE VALUE CHROMA GLOSS BRILLIANCE SHIPPING PART
SUFFIX DL* Da* Db* DE* CMC NUMBER DATE TYPE
Administrative Section
SOURCE RED YEL GRN BLU LIGHT DAR K GRAY CLEAN HIGH LOW HIGH LOW SUFFIX DISPOSITION
COLOR EVALUATION
META LLIC COLOR
COLOR TRISTIMULUS DA TA MA STER MA STER MA TERIAL MA TERIA L HUE V ALUE CHROMA GLOSS BRILLIANCE SHIPPING PART
SUFFIX DL* Da* Db* DE* CMC NUMBER DA TE TY PE SOURCE R ED YEL GR N B LU LIG HT D AR K GRAY C LEAN HIGH LOW HIGH LOW SUFFIX DISPOSITION
COMMENTS
COMMENTS
What is It?
Actual samples that reflect the parts
documented in the PPAP.
Objective or Purpose
• Confirm cosmetic or functional
part approval.
When to Use It
• Sample parts should be delivered
WITH the PPAP submission
clearly understands
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Eaton design
Comment
finishing, special processes and/or packaging requirements as may be specified on drawing, purchase order or in the supplier quality manual. Add rows as required. (Yes / No) Change Required
1
2
3
4
5
Eaton Agrees Specification
IMPORT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: Add rows as required. Please refer to the Supplier Excellence Manual for further clarifications of governing requirements. Comment
(Yes / No) Change Required
Material COA Requirement Please identify material standard and where The test will Be
requirements
1 (Raw Material Composition done (3rd party lab / supplier plant lab / material supplier)
Test)
Material Performance Test Please identify which test can be done and where (3rd party
2
lab / supplier plant lab / material supplier)
Product safety requirement For material part or Casting process part, please identify
whether the product's radiation conforms with all specific
3 national standards. List who completed the radiation testing
(supplier plant lab or 3rd party). For other material or
process part, fill "NA" in the item
4
• It also provides a
5
Team Feasibility Commitment Questions
Lessons Learned
# Consideration Yes / No Comments
Caliper 1 Is product adequately defined (application requirements, etc. to enable feasibility evaluation?
CMM 2 Can Engineering Performance Specifications be met as written?
3
Color Chip Can product be manufactured to tolerances specified on drawing?
4
Drop Gage Can product be manufactured with Cpk's that meet requirements?
5
Gage Blocks Is there adequate capacity to produce product?
6 Does the design allow the use of efficient material handling techniques?
Spectrophotometer
By signing this document you (supplier) confirm that at the time of mass production you can achieve all print requirements unless otherwise noted "No" in column F above
Texture Plaques
Thread Gage
Visual
Supplier Representative Signature and Date
x Sign Here
Type/Print name here
Type/Print Title Here
Suppliers: Type name on each page
X Sign Here
Type/print name here
Eaton SDE/SQE Name & Signature Date
Evaluation
Special Confirm supplier (you) Measure and input at
Print Requirements Measurem
Characteristics are capable of the completion of
(Including all Dimensions, ent
# / Critical To manufacture and meet PPAP run Supplier Comments
Notes and Specifications or Technique
Quality (CTQ) the require specification
as instructed by Eaton) (Gage
(Yes or No) (Yes / No)
used) SPC PpK / CpK
- Require to fill in all the Print requirements following by the Ballooned prints with numbering.
- For complicated or family parts, only listing the exceptional dimensions or requirements is acceptable. But Ballooned prints are necessary to be attached to show
all the Print requirements have been reviewed.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By signing this document you (supplier) confirm that at the time of mass production you can achieve all print requirements unless otherwise noted "No" in column F
Texture Plaques
Supplier Representative Signature and Date Eaton SDE/SQE Name & Signature Date
x Sign Here X Sign Here
Type/Print name here Type/print name here
Type/Print Title Here
Suppliers: Type name on each page Eaton Purchasing Name & Signature Date
x Sign Here
Type/print name here
Validates APQP Process was followed & checks other important factors for
success
Street Address
Customer Name/Division
Buyer/Buyer Code
supplier confirms the design and
City
MATERIALS REPORTING
Region Postal Code Country Application
validation of manufacturing
Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported?
SUBMISSION RESULTS
• document part approval
The results for dimensional measurements material and functional tests appearance criteria statistical process package
These results meet all design record requirements:
Mold / Cavity / Production Process
Yes NO (If "NO" - Explanation Required)
• provide key information
DECLARATION
I affirm that the samples represented by this w arrant are representative of our parts, w hich w ere made by a process that meets
all Production Part Approval Process Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I further affirm that these samples w ere produced at the
production rate of ____/____ hours. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for your
• declare that the parts meet
review . I have noted any deviation from this declaration below .
EXPLANATION/COMMENTS:
specification
Is each Customer Tool properly tagged and numbered? Yes No n/a
Print Name
Title
Phone No.
E-mail
Fax No.
Date
When to Use It
PPAP Warrant Disposition:
FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY (IF APPLICABLE)
Safety and/or Government Regulation Yes No Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)
Safety and/or Government Regulation Yes No Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)
Saf ety and/or Government Regulation Yes No Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)
ORGANIZ AT ION M ANUFACT URING INFORM AT ION CUST OM ER SUBM ITT AL INFORM ATION
ADDRESS
Street A ddress Buyer/Buy er Code
Has c ustomer-required Substances of Conc ern inf ormation been reported? Yes No
A re polymeric parts identif ied w ith appropriate ISO marking codes ? Yes No n/a
DECL ARATION
EXPLA NA TION/COMMENTS:
etc.
Is each Customer Tool properly tagged and numbered?
Date
Saf ety and/or Government Regulation Yes No Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)
ORGANIZ AT ION M ANUFACT URING INFORM AT ION CUST OM ER SUBM ITT AL INFORM ATION
ADDRESS
Street A ddress Buyer/Buy er Code
Has c ustomer-required Substances of Conc ern inf ormation been reported? Yes No
A re polymeric parts identif ied w ith appropriate ISO marking codes ? Yes No n/a
DECL ARATION
I af f irm that the s amples repres ented by this w arrant are repres entative of our parts, w hich w ere made by a process that meets
all Produc tion Part A pprov al Proces s Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I f urther af f irm that thes e samples w ere produced at the
production rate of ____/____ hours. I also certif y that doc umented evidenc e of such complianc e is on f ile and av ailable f or your
rev iew . I have noted any dev iation f rom this dec laration below .
EXPLA NA TION/COMMENTS:
Engineering Change Lev el • The supplier indicates the PPAP level and
ECL Dated ECL DATE
A dditional Engineering Changes Dated
Dated
ORGANIZATION
design specifications.
ORGANIZ AT ION M ANUFACT URING INFORM AT ION
CODE
CUST OM ER SUBM ITT AL INFORM ATION
CUSTOMER DIVISION
Supplier Name & Supplier/V endor Code Customer Name/Div ision
ADDRESS
Street A ddress
• This certification is by cavity, production Buyer/Buy er Code
line, etc.
CITY STATE ZIP APPLICATION
City Region Postal Code Country A pplication
Has c ustomer-required Substances of Conc ern inf ormation been reported? Yes No
A re polymeric parts identif ied w ith appropriate ISO marking codes ? Yes No n/a
DECL ARATION
I af f irm that the s amples repres ented by this w arrant are repres entative of our parts, w hich w ere made by a process that meets
all Produc tion Part A pprov al Proces s Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I f urther af f irm that thes e samples w ere produced at the
production rate of ____/____ hours. I also certif y that doc umented evidenc e of such complianc e is on f ile and av ailable f or your
rev iew . I have noted any dev iation f rom this dec laration below .
EXPLA NA TION/COMMENTS:
Saf ety and/or Gov ernment Regulation Yes No Pur c has e Or der No. Weight ( kg)
ORGANIZAT ION M ANUFACTURING INFORM ATION CUSTOM ER SUBM ITT AL INFORM ATION
A DDRES S
Str eet A ddres s Buy er /Buy er Code
Has c us tomer- r equired Subs tanc es of Conc ern inf or mation been r epor ted? Yes No
A r e poly mer ic par ts identif ied w ith appropr iate ISO mar king c odes ? Yes No n/a
DECL ARATION
I af f irm that the s amples r epres ented by this w ar rant are repr es entativ e of our parts , w hic h w er e made by a proc es s that meets
all Pr oduc tion Par t A ppr ov al Proc es s Manual 4th Edition Requir ements . I f ur ther af f ir m that thes e s amples w er e pr oduc ed at the
•
pr oduc tion rate of ____/____ hour s . I als o c er tif y that doc umented ev idenc e of s uc h c omplianc e is on f ile and av ailable f or y our
r ev iew .
EXPLA NA TION/COMMENTS:
•
Cus tomer Signature Date
Pr int Name
The supplier states the production rate. Cus tomer Trac king Number (optional)
Saf ety and/or Gov ernment Regulation Yes No Pur c has e Or der No. Weight ( kg)
A DDRES S
•
Str eet A ddres s Buy er /Buy er Code
CITY
City
Submitted by
for production shipments
IMDS or
of Conc ern inf or mation been r epor ted?
A r e poly mer ic par ts identif ied w ith appropr iate ISO mar king c odes ? Yes No n/a
DECL ARATION
I af f irm that the s amples r epres ented by this w ar rant are repr es entativ e of our parts , w hic h w er e made by a proc es s that meets
all Pr oduc tion Par t A ppr ov al Proc es s Manual 4th Edition Requir ements . I f ur ther af f ir m that thes e s amples w er e pr oduc ed at the
pr oduc tion rate of ____/____ hour s . I als o c er tif y that doc umented ev idenc e of s uc h c omplianc e is on f ile and av ailable f or y our
r ev iew . I hav e noted any dev iation f r om this dec laration below .
EXPLA NA TION/COMMENTS:
Is eac h Cus tomer Tool proper ly tagged and numbered? Yes No n/a
• Reviewers Checklist
Must be completely filled out
Must be signed by the supplier
P/N must match the PO
Product family submissions allowed
Submitted at the correct revision level
Submitted at the correct submission level
Specify the reason for submission
Include IMDS, RoHS, etc. as required
Clearly state the production rate used for validation
© 2014 Eaton. All Rights Reserved.
139
PPAP Progress Check – Final (True/False)