Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internal Competences & Resources Core, Distinctive, Strategic & Threshold Competence, Competence vs
Capability, Resource Analysis , Value Chain Analysis, Strategic Outsourcing Core competence and synergy,
Distinctive competencies, VRIO analysis
Capabilities and Competences
• Capability-based strategies are based on the notion
that internal resources and core competencies derived
from distinctive capabilities provide the strategy
platform that underlies a firm's long-term profitability
• Evaluation of these capabilities begins with a
company capability profile, which examines a
company's strengths and weaknesses in key areas:
– Managerial
– Marketing
– Financial
• Capability-based strategies, sometimes referred to as
the resource-based view of the firm, are determined by
– those internal resources and capabilities that provide the
platform for the firm's strategy and
– those resources and capabilities that are the primary source
of profit for the firm
• A key management function is to identify what
resource gaps need to be filled in order to maintain a
competitive edge where these capabilities are required
• Several levels can be established in defining the
firm's overall strategy platform
• At the bottom of the pyramid are the basic
resources a firm has compiled over time
• They can be categorized as
– technical factors,
– competitive factors,
– managerial factors, and
– financial factors
• Competence can be defined as “a firm’s
capacity to deploy its resources using
processes to affect a desired end.”
• Core competencies are the bundle of skills and resources
that allow a company to
– compete successfully,
– achieve profitability and be the foundation of competitive
advantage
• Business in the past would have considered core
competencies something that was to be held in house and
closely guarded
• The increasing complexity of businesses means that what a
core competency is and how it should be controlled has
become less obvious
• Core competencies are the main strengths or
strategic advantages of a business,
– including the combination of pooled knowledge and
– technical capacities that allow a business to be
competitive in the marketplace
• A core competency should allow a company to
expand into new end markets as well as provide a
significant benefit to customers
• It should also be hard for competitors to replicate
• Core competencies can be defined as the unique combination
of the resources and experiences of a particular firm
– It takes time to build these core competencies and they are difficult to
imitate
• Critical to sustaining these core competencies are their:
– Durability - their life span is longer than individual product or
technology life-cycles, as are the life spans of resources used to
generate them, including people
– In transparency - it is difficult for competitors to imitate these
competencies quickly
– Immobility - these capabilities and resources are difficult to transfer
• ‘Core competence’ introduced by Pralhad and Hamel
[1990]
• They conceptualized core competence as the
collective learning in the organization, especially how
to coordinate diverse production skills and integrate
multiple streams of technologies
• Subsequently the term core competence has been
used by many authors, and most of them have related
the term in the context of gaining competitive
advantage
• The core competency theory is the theory of
strategy that prescribes actions to be taken by
firms to achieve competitive advantage in the
marketplace
• The concept of core competency states that
firms must play to their strengths or those
areas or functions in which they have
competencies
• By providing a basis for firms to compete and
achieve sustainable competitive advantage,
Pralhad and Hamel pioneered the concept and
laid the foundation for companies to follow in
practice.
• Some core competencies that firms might have include
– Technical superiority,
– Its customer relationship management, and
– Processes that are vastly efficient.
• The implications for real world practice are that core
competencies must be nurtured and the business model built
around them instead of focusing too much on areas where the firm
does not have competency
• This is not to say that other competencies must be neglected or
ignored
• The idea behind the concept is that firms must leverage upon their
core strengths and play to their advantages
• Core Competency Criteria:
– Valuable
– Rare
– Costly to imitate
– Non-substitutable
Capability vs. Competency
• “Competency” and “capability” are two terms
that pertain to human ability.
• “Capability” is the term that describes the
quality of being capable
• It is the condition that permits an individual to
acquire the power and ability to learn and do
something within their capacity
• “Capability” is also known as implied abilities,
or abilities that are not yet developed
• A person with a capability has the potential to acquire
a specific ability or skill that will be helpful in a task
• The learned skill or ability adds to a person’s
knowledge bank or skill set
• Capabilities also improve the functions of a person,
which can lead to more productivity
• New skills and abilities make a person more capable
to complete a certain task, which in turn makes them
a more suitable candidate for certain job positions
• With time and practice, capabilities can
develop into competence
• Capabilities serve as the starting point of being
able to do something and gradually becoming
more adept in performing the task
• “Competence” is the state or quality of an individual’s
work
• A person and their work can be evaluated as competent
if the performance is considered “satisfactory” but not
“outstanding.”
• Competence can also be applied to the improvement or
development of one’s abilities and skills for the benefit
of the person and the group or institution they represent
• The improved skills and abilities are applied to tasks or
jobs
• Competence can also result in an increased quality of work
or performance
• In return, the work and performance will produce more
satisfying and favorable results from other parties like
clients, bosses, and other relevant individuals
• Competence starts as a person’s capabilities. In a sense,
competence is the proven abilities and improved
capabilities
• Competence can include a combination of knowledge, basic
requirements (capabilities), skills, abilities, behavior, and
attitude
Resources
• “The tangible and intangible assets of a firm which can
be drawn upon by the firm when required to achieve its
objectives”.
• Unique Resources :
– A unique or strategic resource is one that allows ongoing
competitive advantage and enhanced outcomes
– They are product or project dependent and can be tangible or
intangible
– A unique tangible resource by itself is unlikely to give an
ongoing competitive advantage, it is normally the combination
of the resource and its deployment that gives it value
The VRIN model
• Value: This is the unique resources that can
unlock value and competitive advantage.
• Rarity: These are the resources that possessed
by few other organizations.
• Imitability: The resources that a difficult to
copy.
• Non substitutability: These are the ‘pinch
points’, the resources that can’t be replaced.
• Rolls Royce cars are an example of using
reputation as a unique resource
– There are many car manufacturers that produce high
quality vehicles but Roll Royce is still the best known
aspirational car in the market place
• This reputation is important because a Rolls
Royce is still a large expensive chunk of metal to
which the same laws of physics apply as other
cars, and for which there is no need only desire
Critical Success Factors
• Critical success factors (CSFs) can be
considered the critical “pinch” points, which
are the areas, products, costs, quality etc. that
must be achieved for the project to work and
compete in the market place successfully
• Identifying CSFs allows planners to recognize
if the company has the capacity to move from
analysis to exploitation of the potential
strategic gap.
Strategic capability
• Strategic capability as the capability of an
enterprise to successfully undertake action that
is intended to affect its long-term growth and
development
Organizational capability
• Ulrich and Lake [1990] define ‘organizational
capability’ as a business’s ability to establish
internal structures and processes that influence
its members to create organization-specific
competencies and thus enable the business to
adapt to changing customer and strategic
needs
Threshold competencies
• Threshold competencies include
– basic knowledge,
– skills,
– traits,
– motives,
– self-image and
– social role and are essential for performing a job
• Without these, some areas of performance will be
substandard
• To move beyond minimal performance,
additional competencies are required
Strategic competence
• Strategic competence as the ability of
organizations (or more precisely their
members) to acquire, store, recall, interpret
and act upon information of relevance to the
longer-term survival and well-being of the
organization
VRIO Analysis
• VRIO Analysis is an analytical technique brilliant
for the evaluation of company’s resources and
thus the competitive advantage
• VRIO is an acronym from the initials of the
names of the evaluation dimensions:
– Value,
– Rareness,
– Imitability,
– Organization
• The VRIO Analysis was developed by Jay B.
Barney as a way of evaluating the resources of
an organization (company’s micro-
environment) which are as follows:
– Financial resources
– Human resources
– Material resources
– Non-material resources (information, knowledge)
• The dimensions of VRIO are:
– Value - How expensive is the resource and how easy is
it to obtain on the market (purchase, lease, rent..)?
– Rareness - How rare or limited is the resource?
– Imitability - How difficult is it to imitate the resource?
– Organization, respectively arrangement
– Is the resource supported by any existing arrangements
and can the organization use it properly?
What is the VRIO good for?