Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All Agreements Are Not Contracts But All Contracts
All Agreements Are Not Contracts But All Contracts
agreements.
Farina v Fickus, 1900(just an expression of an intention but not a firm offer capable
of acceptance)
Balfour v Balfour, 1919
Rose Frank & Co. v Crompton Brothers Ltd, 1923
Jones v Padavatton 1969
Merritt v Merritt, 1970
Gould v Gould
2)The terms of an offer must be certain or capable of being made certain
According to section 29the agreements meaning of which is not certain or capable
of being made certain are void.
Taylor v Portington, 1855
Gunthing v Lynn, 1831
3) OFFER must be communicated to the offeree
Section 4 of ICA “ the communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the
knowledge of the person”
Lalman Shukla v Gauri Datt, 1913
Offer may be of Specific or General
An offer need not be made to an ascertained person, but no contract can arise until it
has been accepted by an ascertained person----Anson
Weeks v Tybald, 1605
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, 1893 (proposals acceptable by conduct)
Lalman shukla’s case
Section 8 Acceptance by performing conditions, or receiving consideration
Har Bhajan Lal V Har Charan Lal, 1925
Where a General offer is of continuing nature, as it was, it will be open for acceptance to
any number of persons until it is retracted. But where an offer requires some information
as to a missing thing, it is closed as soon as the first information comes in.
Cross offer
Tinn v Hoffman (1873) 29 LT 271
Counter offer
Hyde v Wrench (1840)
Promise express and implied section 9
Upton-on-Severn RDC v Powell, 1942
Acceptance
Section 2(b)
When the person to whom the proposal is made, signifies his assent thereto, the proposal
is said to be accepted. A proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise;
Acceptance must be absolute and unconditional sec 7
Neale v Merret, 1930
Hyde v Wrench,1840
Communication by acceptor himself or acceptance can be given by the offeree and no one
else
Boulton Jones , 1857
Powel v Lee, 1908
Acceptance must be given before the offer is revoked of offer lapses
When communication not necessary
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke ball company
Communication to offeror himself
Felthouse v Bindley, 1863
Offeror cannot impose the Burden of Refusal
Cotton Corporation of India Ltd v Bombay Dieing & Mfg Co Ltd, 2006
Acceptance by external manifestation or overt act
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co, 1877
Communication section4
Communication of offer and acceptance when complete
Lalman Shukla v gauri datt
R v Clarke, 1927
William v Carwardine, 1833
Modes of Communication
Eliason v Henshaw, 1819
Acceptance must be made in a prescribed manner
When no manner prescribed usual and reasonable manner
Postal communication
Adams v Lindsell, 1818
Household Fire & Accident Insurance co v grant, 1879
Communication when complete
4. Communication when complete.—The communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge
of the person to whom it is made. —The communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge
of the person to whom it is made." The communication of an acceptance is complete,— as against the proposer,
when it is put in a course of transmission to him so as to be out of the power of the acceptor; as against the acceptor,
when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer. The communication of a revocation is complete,— as against the
person who makes it, when it is put into a course of transmission to the person to whom it is made, so as to be out
of the power of the person who makes it; as against the person to whom it is made, when it comes to his knowledge.
When parties in direct communication
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East corporation, 1955
Bhagavandas Goverdhandas Kedia v Giridharilal Parshottamdas &co, 1966