You are on page 1of 30

Transportation Engineering

Department of Civil Engineering


Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology

Submitted To : Presented By :
Dr. Pritikana Das C Noor Mohammed Parvez
Department of Civil Engineering 202111513
STRENGTHENING FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
USING FWD TECHNIQUE
Contents :
1. Introduction
2. Principle of Pavement Evaluation Using FWD
3. Specification of FWD
4. Calibration of FWD
5. Pavement Evaluation Survey and Data Collection
6. Analysis of Field Data
7. Overlay Design
8. Conclusion
9. References
INTRODUCTION :
What is FWD?

■ Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) is an Non Destructive Impulse-

loading device in which a transient load is applied to the pavement and the

deflected shape of the pavement surface is measured.

■ It is used to evaluate structural condition of pavement and estimating the

overlay thickness to be provided.


Why FWD is preferred over BBD?

 FWD closely simulates the duration and amplitude of the load pulses
produced by moving wheel loads.

 Quick and accurate testing.

 Entire test can be run from a laptop inside car.


PRINCIPLE OF PAVEMENT EVALUATION USING
FWD :
 The working principle of the FWD is a mass of weights is dropped from
a pre-determined height onto a series of springs placed on top of a
loading plate. The corresponding peak load and peak vertical surface
deflections at different radial locations are measured.
Specifications :
S.No FWD Components IRC recommended Specification for FWD
1 Plate Diameter 300mm/450mm
2 Mass Density Single Mass
3 Falling Weight Mass 50 to 350Kg
4 Height of fall 100 to 600mm
5 Target Peak Load 40KN
6 Load Pulse Time 15-50ms
7 Load Cell Accuracy + 2%
8 Number of deflection Transducers 6 to 9
9 Deflection Sensor Types Geophones
10 Reading of resolution of deflection Min 1um
transducers
11 Deflection transducers accuracy + 2%
■ Deflection sensors are placed on the surface of pavement at
different radial direction aligned in the longitudinal direction :-

i. 7 sensors at 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500 and 1800 mm radial distances

ii. 7 sensors at 0, 200, 300, 450, 600, 900, 1500 mm radial distances

iii. 6 sensors at 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200 and 1500 mm radial distances and

iv. 6 sensors at 0, 200, 300, 600, 900, 1200 mm radial distances.


Calibration of FWD :
1. Static Calibration :
■ The date of calibration of the load cell should not be earlier than 365 days
from the date of structural evaluation of pavements using FWD .

2. Load Repeatability :
■ Peak deflection 250 to 600 μm

■ Standard Deviation for min. of 12 load drops <5% of the mean peak load.

3. Absolute calibration of deflection transducers :


■ Should be accurate to 2%
Pavement Evaluation Survey and Data Collection
1. Historical data about pavement :
 Historical data can be useful in identifying the reasons for different
distresses.
2. Pavement condition survey :
 Pavement condition survey is primarily of visual observations
supplemented by measurements for estimation of cracking, rutting and
other distresses in the pavement.
3. Deflection Measurement :
■ Estimation of sample size

■ Cv- coefficient of variation for Good, fair and poor as 15%, 30% and 45%
respectively.
Steps for measuring deflection :
1. Mark the test point and center the load plate over the test point on
pavement.

2. The longitudinal and transverse slope of the pavement should not exceed
10 percent at the test location for accurate measurement of deflection.

3. Lower the frame holding the displacement transducers (geophones) so


that the transducers are in contact with pavement surface.

4. Raise the mass to a pre-determined height required for producing a target


load of 40 kN
5. Raise the mass and drop. Record load and deflection data into the
computer through data acquisition system.

6. Record air & Pavement temperature at hourly interval.

7. Raise the geophone frame and load plate and move to the next test
location.

8. Measure pavement temperature by drilling holes of 40mm depth into the


pavement surface layer by using glycerol.

9. Deflection measurements should not be made when the pavement


temperature is more than 45°C.
Determination of Pavement Layer
Thicknesses
■ Pavement layer thickness is essential inputs :
 To the process of backcalculation of layer moduli
 To the estimation of remaining life and
 Overlay requirements of the in-service pavement.
Determined Using :
 Historical Data
 By excavating test Pits
 Ground Penetrating Radar Survey
Note:
It is generally difficult to excavate test pits in the inner lanes, it is suggested that
cores be taken in the bituminous layers at 2.0 km interval on the inner lanes and at
1.0 km interval on the outer lanes (in the case of multi-lane divided or undivided
carriageways).

Dynamic Cone Penetration test :


■ Conducted to obtain the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer value for in-situ subgrade.
Analysis of Data :
1. Processing of load and deflection data
2. Identification of Homogeneous Sub-sections
 A statistical technique popularly used for identification of homogeneous
sections is the "Cumulative Difference" approach.
 It compares the sequence of actual cumulative sums in a measurement series
with the sums that would have resulted from adding averages.
 The difference between these values is termed as cumulative difference.
■ According to AASHTO (1986), a section border is indicated whenever
the “trend” in the series of cumulative differences changes from positive
to negative or vice versa.
■ No sub-section should be shorter than 1.0 km in length and each
subsection should have at least twelve deflection test locations.
3. Back Calculation of Layer Moduli
■ Inputs : Surface deflections, layer thicknesses, Poisson's ratio values
of different layers, applied peak load and loading plate radius.
■ Outputs : The elastic moduli of different layers of the existing pavement.

■ IRC 115-2014 recommends KGPBACK software for back calculation of


pavement layer moduli.
■ Correction for Temperature and Seasonal Variation to be done for layer
moduli as per IRC 115-2014
Overlay Design :
■ Data Required :
 Design Traffic
 Elastic Moduli
 Critical strain in the layers ( calculated using IITPAVE
software)
 Performance Criteria
Performance Criteria :
 The following are the steps to be followed for design of overlays for Indian
highways based on FWD evaluation:

1) Measurement of surface deflections of homogeneous section of the in-


service pavement using FWD

2) Normalization of the deflections correspond to a standard load of 40 KN

3) Collection of information about layer type and layer thicknesses of


pavement layer moduli using an appropriate backcalculation software.
Backcalculation will be done by considering the pavement to be a three
layer system.

4) Correction for Temperature and Seasonal Variation to be done for layer


moduli as per IRC 115-2014.
5) Selection of 15th percentile modulus (15% of the values will be less than
this value) of each of the three layers considered for analysis.

6) Computing the critical strains using IITPAVE software by taking thickness


and layer moduli as inputs.

7) The strain values obtained will be used to estimate the remaining lives
from fatigue and rutting consideration.

8) The combination of existing pavement and overlay will be analysed as a


four-layer system to ensure that fatigue and rutting criteria are satisfied for
the assumed design traffic.

9) Design overlay thickness can be selected by trial in such a way that the
computed critical strains are less than the permissible limits given by the
performance criteria for the design traffic level considered.
Conclusion :
We concluded that the FWD is more better than the BBD and we can handle
easily. By using this FWD we can determining the elastic moduli of
pavement layers, and using these moduli as inputs to a pavement design
model for overlay requirement. And we can also estimate the residual life of
an existing pavement and overlay requirement.
References :
■ Guidelines for structural evaluation and strengthening of flexible road
pavements using falling weight deflectometer (FWD) technique IRC:115-
2014.
■ Guidelines for design of flexible pavement IRC 37-2014

■ Dr. Pritikana Das, Department of Civil Engineering

■ www.slideshare.net

■ Flexible Pavement Overlay Design Using Cumulative Difference Approach


of Homogeneous Section, International Journal of Technical Innovation in
Modern Engineering & Science (IJTIMES).

You might also like