Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(MBA666)
Raghu Nandan Sengupta
Industrial & Management Department
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Leadership
Cumulative
Concept Planning Execution Termination
Cost
Time
Cost
Time
Phases
1) Conceptualisation
2) Planning
3) Execution
4) Termination
5
2 10
11
6
1 3 12
7
13
4
8
14
w1
p1 w2 1 w
p2
p3 w3
p4
w4
Case I Case II
Outcome Points Outcome Points
Win 2 Win 5
Draw 1 Draw 1
Lose 0 Lose 0
Accordingly we have E[U(1)] = 3.825 and E[U(2)] = 12.69. So we can have a different
decision depending on the form of utility function we are using.
U (W )
U (W )
W1 W1 1 W1 2
W
U (W )
W1 W1 1 W1 2 W
U (W )
W1 W1 1 W1 2 W
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00 U( W)
A( W)
20.00
A' ( W)
15.00 R( W)
R' ( W)
10.00
5.00
0.00
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00
- 5.00
2.00
1.50
1.00 U(W)
U (W )
A(W)
0.50
A'(W)
0.00 R(W)
R'(W)
-0.50
-1.00
-1.50
W
0.00
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 U(W)
-5.00 A(W)
U(W)
A'(W)
-10.00 R(W)
R'(W)
-15.00
-20.00
W
0.40
0.20
U(W)
0.00
A(W)
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00
U(W)
-0.20 A'(W)
-0.40 R(W)
R'(W)
-0.60
-0.80
-1.00
W
A B
Expected Value
p2
p3 w3
h4 b4
p4
w4
1 h4 0
2 * A 2 * B
RL RA RB
Pr RP RL
0.05
z RB
RP P*
RL , 4
RL,3
RL , 2
RL,1
P
A2
RP A1
B2
B1
RL
P
Stochastic Dominance
• First-order stochastic dominance
• Second-order stochastic
dominance
• Third-order stochastic dominance
Example # 08
·Objective: Selecting a car
·Criteria: Style, Cost, Fuel-economy
·Alternatives: Civic , i20 , Escort,
Alto
Style 1 1/2 3
Cost 2 1 4
Row
Normalized 0.30 0.28 0.37
1 0.5 3 Column Sums
averages 0.32
A= 2 1 4 0.60 0.57 0.51 X= 0.56
0.33 0.25 0.10 0.15 0.12 0.12
1.0 Priority vector
Column sums 3.33 1.75 8.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Criteria weights
• Style 0.32
• Cost 0.56
• Fuel Economy 0.12
C.I. = 0.02
n=3
R.I. = 0.50(from table)
So, C.R. = C.I./R.I. = 0.02/0.52 = 0.04
C.R. ≤ 0.1 indicates sufficient consistency for decision.
Economy
Fuel
Cost
Style
Civic .13 .38 .30 .28
.32
i20 .24 .29 .24 .25
x
.56 =
Escort .07 .07 .21 .07
Alto .56 .26 .25 .12 .34
Normalized Cost/Benefits
Cost Benefits Ratio
Cost
• CIVIC $12k 0.22 0.28 0.78
• i20 $15K 0.28 0.25 1.12
• ESCORT $ 9K 0.17 0.07 2.42
• Alto $18K 0.33 0.34 0.97
2
2
8 0.104690.5 8 0.105361.0
e e
2 2
8 R1.5
100 e 96
2
and R = 0.10681 or 10.681%
0.25 10.127
0.50 10.469
1.00 10.536
1.50 10.681
2.00 10.808
12
Zero
Rate (%)
11
10.68 10.808
10.469 10.53 1
10 6
10.127
9 Maturity (yrs)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
1 10.0
2 10.5 11.0
3 10.8 11.4
4 11.0 11.6
5 11.1 11.5
Rate
FR
ZR
PY
Maturity
Project RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT 251
Management:MBA666 Kanpur,INDIA
Sloping of the different rates curves when
Yield curve is downward sloping
Rate
PY
ZR
FR
Maturity
Project C
Project B
Return
Project A+B+C+D Project D
Project A
Risk(Standard deviation)
2
P
Now if we have a set of different projects and we have to choose one from
that set then how do we decide which project to choose.
Just find the project for which NPV is maximum.
For an investor he/she can either select a firm based on the NPV of the
project that the particular firm has under taken or consider the project (i.e.,
the firm) which results in maximum expansion of the efficient frontier.
Note: These two selection criterion are equivalent.
w
i 1
i 1
wi 0
w
i 1
i 1
are unbounded
w 's i
subject to
n n
w w i j i, j 2*
w
i 1
i 1 wi 0
i , j 1
w w
i , j 1
i j i, j 2*
w 1
unbounded
i 1
i
wi ' s
w R
i 1
i i R *
w
i 1
i 1
RP ( n 3) R *
*2
7 R
P ( n 3) 2* R
*
3 2
R
MVP( RMVP , MVP )
B ( RB , B )
A( R A , A )
R
n n
i i
w R R *
w
i 1
i 1 wi 0
i 1
j
v 1
j 1
w1=(0.088,0.251,0.282,0.104,0.275)
Thus we finally have R 1 14.413 1 0.791
j
v 2
j 1
w2=(0.158,0.155,0.314,0.038,0.334)
Thus we finally have R 2 15.202 2 0.812
Borrowing
Lending
Lending Borrowing
Q ( RQ , Q )
F ( R f ,0)
R
Q ( RQ , Q )
F ( R f ,0)
such that n
wi 1
i 1
There are two solution methods and one is using
Lagrangian. We will discuss that only
Q1 ( RQ , Q1 )
1
Q2 ( RQ , Q2 )
R 2
Q3 ( RQ , Q3 )
F1 ( R f1 ,0) 3
F2 ( R f 2 ,0)
F3 ( R f 3 ,0)
Thus we have RQ R f
max
Q
n
such that wi 1 wi 0
i 1
For this we have to use quadratic formulation and we would not
discuss it here.
Thus we have n n
min{ wi2 i,i wi w j i j }
i 1 i j 1
such that n
wi Ri RP*
i 1
n
wi 1
i 1
wi 0
wimax wi wimin
n
| wi | 1
i 1
Hence the errors are: +1, -1, +2, -1, -1 which adds up to 0 as the case should be
Draw the scatter plot of S&P CNX Niftyt vs. S&P CNX Niftyt-1
For each of the script draw the graph of script price with S&P CNX
Nifty
For each of the script draw the graph of script return with S&P CNX
Nifty return
For each script draw the volatility of the script price with volatility of
S&P CNX Nifty
For each script draw the volatility of the script return with volatility of
S&P CNX Nifty return
For each script draw the total volumes traded against the day
For each script draw the total value traded against the day
Note: For this set of assignment the time frame is 01-Jan-2014 to 31-
Dec-2016
Project RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT 336
Management:MBA66 Kanpur,INDIA
Investment Process
S&P CNX Nifty Price <
https://www.nseindia.com/products/content/equities/indices/historical_index_data.htm>
Ri.t
i
i
Rm,t
i, j bi (1)b j (1) I2(1) bi ( 2)b j (2) I2(2) ..... bi ( L)b j ( L) I2( L) I2( L)
2
i Ri R f
m ( ) j
j 1 2( j )
Ci
2
i 2j
1 m 2
j 1 ( j )
2
n Ri R f
m ( 2
) i
i 1 (i )
Ci
n 2
2
1 m 2i
i 1 (i )
2
n Ri R f
m ( 2
) i
i 1 (i )
Ci
n 2
2
1 m 2i
i 1 (i )
Ri R f
i
Project RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT 389
Management:MBA66 Kanpur,INDIA
Investment Process
Without SS
Ri R f include
C*
i
Ri R f * include
do
Cnot
i
With SS
Ri R f include
*
C
i
Ri R f include with SS
C*
i
1 i j 1 j
f
Ci
i i
1 29 24 3 8 ½ 8 4
2 19 14 2 7 1/3 15 5
3 29 24 4 6 ¼ 21 5.25
4 35 30 6 5 1/5 26 5.2
5 14 9 2 4.5 1/6 30.5 5.08
6 21 16 4 4 1/7 34.5 4.93
7 26 21 6 3.5 1/8 38 4.75
8 14 9 3 3 1/9 41 4.56
9 15 10 5 2 1/10 43 4.3
10 9 4 2 2 1/11 45 4.09
11 11 6 4 1.5 1/12 46.5 3.88
12 8 3 3 1 1/13 47.5 3.65
This C* is different from the C*s we have considered under the single index mode. Also the n
is different for the case when SS is not allowed and for the case when SS is allowed
0.5
C1 *8 4
1 0.5 1* 0.5
0.5
C2 *[8 7] 5
1 0.5 2 * 0.5
0.5
C3 *[8 7 6] 5.25
1 0.5 3 * 0.5
1 n j 1 j
f
Ci
i i
1 29 24 3 8 1/13 47.5 3.65
2 19 14 2 7 1/13 47.5 3.65
3 29 24 4 6 1/13 47.5 3.65
4 35 30 6 5 1/13 47.5 3.65
5 14 9 2 4.5 1/13 47.5 3.65
6 21 16 4 4 1/13 47.5 3.65
7 26 21 6 3.5 1/13 47.5 3.65
8 14 9 3 3 1/13 47.5 3.65
9 15 10 5 2 1/13 47.5 3.65
10 9 4 2 2 1/13 47.5 3.65
11 11 6 4 1.5 1/13 47.5 3.65
12 8 3 3 1 1/13 47.5 3.65
This C* is different from the C*s we have considered under the single index mode. Also the n
is different for the case when SS is not allowed and for the case when SS is allowed
1 n j 1 j
f
Ci
i i
1 29 24 3 8 1/13 47.5 3.65
2 19 14 2 7 1/13 47.5 3.65
3 29 24 4 6 1/13 47.5 3.65
4 35 30 6 5 1/13 47.5 3.65
5 14 9 2 4.5 1/13 47.5 3.65
6 21 16 4 4 1/13 47.5 3.65
7 26 21 6 3.5 1/13 47.5 3.65
8 14 9 3 3 1/13 47.5 3.65
9 15 10 5 2 1/13 47.5 3.65
10 9 4 2 2 1/13 47.5 3.65
11 11 6 4 1.5 1/13 47.5 3.65
12 8 3 3 1 1/13 47.5 3.65
This C* is different from the C*s we have considered under the single index mode. Also the n
is different for the case when SS is not allowed and for the case when SS is allowed
M ( RM , M )
F ( R f ,0)
R
2
M ( RM , M )
F ( R f ,0)
R
cov( R, RM )
Project RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT 426
Management:MBA66 Kanpur,INDIA
Investment Process
Security market line
M ( RM ,1)
F ( R f ,0)
R
M ( RM , M )
F ( R f ,0)
R Portfolio with
systematic risk Portfolios with systematic
only and nonsystematic risks
M ( RM ,1)
Jensens Index
F ( R f ,0)
Project RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT 434
Management:MBA66 Kanpur,INDIA
Investment Process
In order to measure the efficiency of a
security or the market we use, S, the
Sharpe index and the formula is given by
ˆR R Sˆ
i f i
M ( RM , M )
i ( Ri , i )
F ( R f ,0)
R Theta
Project RNSengupta,IME Dept.,IIT 436
Management:MBA66 Kanpur,INDIA
Investment Process
CAPM model with stochastic price would
be
E[ Pi (t T2 ) ] Pi (t T1 ) E[ PM (t T2 ) ] PM (t T1 )
R f i { Rf }
Pi (t T1 ) PM (t T1 )
exp( i , M i M ) 1
where i 2
exp( M ) 1
A C
edge or arc
Activity A
1 2
edge or arc
A B C
E
A C
F
A B
1 2 3 D
C 4
B
A 3
1 2
C 4
D G
B G
2 3 K
7 Q
C H 8
A
A F L O
D 11
4 6 10
1 R
I P
J M S
E
5 9
N
The project network began on more than one node and ended on a
single node. Other variants are:
The Start and Finish boxes tie the network off at its ends and give one a
sense that the network has defined points in time at which the project
begins and ends. The use of such a convention is not necessary and will
generally be avoided.
A E
Start C D
Finish
B F
A C
1 2 A 2 4
1 E
A 2 D
B 3 5
1 B
3
C
2 4
A F
1 H
E 6 7
B
3 D G
5
D
A d1
Rather, this is preferred and why?
C
d2
B
E
4
B, 3 days E, 10 days
4
A, 14 days
1 2 D, 4 days 5
5
C, 7 days
3
4
B, 3 days E, 10 days
4
A, 14 days
1 2 D, 4 days 5
5
C, 7 days
3
E to S
A B
S to S
S to E
5
5
3
2
2
5
4 6 8 9
1 3 2
2
1
3
3 4 7
2 3
4
B, 3 days E, 10 days
4
A, 14 days
1 2 D, 4 days 5
5
C, 7 days
3
Given the early and late start date of any activity/job/task we can
find the amount of slack for that activity/job/task, as LS-ES or LF-
EF, i.e.,
TS = LS –ES or TS = LF- EF
FS(i)=earliest of all ES(j)-EF(i); here j is the set of all
activities/jobs/tasks which are immediate successors to the
activity/job/task i.
Thus the total slack (TS) for the path would simply be the addition
of the slacks of the corresponding activities/jobs/tasks.
Free slack (FS) is the actual number of days which we may have for
us to use as a cushion in case of emergencies.
Remember we always have {FS TS}, and there may be cases
where an/a activity/job/task can have TS but no FS.
4
3
3
10 6
3 5
1
4
14
2 3
7
4
3
3
10
3 5 6
1 4
14
5 3
7
Concrete forms
Reinforcement
Pour concrete
Clear grade
Sewer lines
Concrete forms
Reinforcement
Pour concrete
Clear grade
Sewer lines
4
B, 3, 1 E, 10, 3
A, 14, 4
1 2 D, 4, 2 5
C, 7, 1.5
3
• The longest path is 1-3-5 and the expected time or the critical path time is
12+16=28 and the corresponding variance is 9+16=25.
• This implies the job may take anything between 28-5=23 to 28+5=33
number of days.
• The next longest path (1-2-4-5) has a length of 23 and the corresponding
variance is 9, which implies that the maximum and the minimum time
required along this path is 23+3=26 and 23-3=20 respectively.
• What if due to some external circumstances the standard deviations for the
paths 1-2, 2-4 and 4-5 are 4, 8 and 3 respectively. Then the new sum of
variances for this path is 16+64+9=89.
• In which case the maximum time required along the path 1-2-4-5 is
32.4333. Now can we say which is the critical path and the corresponding
critical activities/jobs/tasks?
4
B, 3 days E, 10 days
4
A, 14 days
1 2 D, 4 days 5
C, 3 days
3
t-SD(t) t D t+SD(t)
Given the due date say D, we may wish to calculate how probable
is it that the project will be completed within that due date, i.e.,
Pr[X D] = Pr[{X-E(t)}/SD(t) {D-E(t)}/SD(t)]. Thus
considering E(t)=50, SD(t)=10 and D=50, we have Pr[Z0]=0.5,
i.e., there is a 50% chance that the project will be completed within
the due date of 50. In other words we can also state that out of 100
cases of the same project being taken up time and again with the
same E(t), SD(t) and due date, D, we will have 50 cases where the
job will be finished within the due date.
We can also find the change in probability that the job will be
completed within the due dates given by the two values, D1 and D2,
i.e., P[Z z1] and P[Z z2], these z1 and z2 are for different values
of D, i.e., z1={D1-E(t)}/SD(t) and z2={D2-E(t)}/SD(t)
Penalty
% complete
Penalty
% complete
F
A C 3
2 2 H
E 2
4
B D G
3 4 5
C
4
A 2 F
E H
1 6 7
B 3 5 G
D
C (5)
2 4
A (9) F (5)
1
D (8) 6
B (8) G (5)
E 3(7) 5
C (5)
2 4
A (8) F (5)
1
D (8) 6
B (8) G (5)
E 3(7) 5
C (5)
2 4
A (7) F (5)
1
D (8) 6
B (8) G (5)
E 3(7) 5
C (5)
2 4
A (6) F (5)
1
D (8) 6
B (8) G (5)
E 3(6) 5
C (5)
2 4
A (6) F (5)
1
D (8) 6
B (8) G (4)
E 3(6) 5
C (5)
2 4
A (6) F (5)
1
D (8) 6
B (8) G (3)
E 3(6) 5
C (5)
2 4
A (6) F (5)
1
D (8) 6
B (8) G (2)
E 3(6) 5
C (4)
2 4
A (6) F (5)
1
D (7) 6
B (8) G (2)
E 3(5) 5
Normal Crashed
Activity
Duration Cost Duration Cost
B F
6 3
A C E H
3 2 6 5
D G
5 4
26 days $ 22,700
25 days $ 22,950
24 days $ 24,700
23 days $ 26,450
22 days $ 28,200
21 days $ 30,200
20 days $ 32,200
19 days $ 34,200
40,000
Crash all
36,000
Crash A+E+H
32,000
24,000 Crash A
All normal
20,000
Duration (days)
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Exclusive OR is a logical operation that outputs true only when inputs differ (one
is true, the other is false)
The truth table of A XOR B shows that it outputs true (value of 1) whenever the
inputs differ
I/P (A) I/P (B) O/P
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 0