Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter One
One
Modern Project Management
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–1
An
An Overview
Overview of
of Project
Project Management
Management 77thth ed
ed
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–2
What
What Is
Is aa Project?
Project?
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–3
Program
Program versus
versus Project
Project
• Program Defined
– A group of related projects designed to accomplish a
common goal over an extended period of time
• Program Management
– A process of managing a group of ongoing,
interdependent, related projects in a coordinated way
to achieve strategic objectives
– Examples:
• Project: completion of a required course
in project management.
• Program: completion of all courses required
for a business major.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–4
Comparison
Comparison of
of Routine
Routine Work
Work with
with Projects
Projects
TABLE 1.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–5
Project
Project Life
Life Cycle
Cycle
FIGURE 1.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–6
The
The Challenge
Challenge of
of Project
Project Management
Management
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–7
Current
Current Drivers
Drivers of
of Project
Project Management
Management
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–8
Project
Project Governance
Governance
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–9
Integrated
Integrated Management
Management of
of Projects
Projects
FIGURE 1.2
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–10
Alignment
Alignment of
of Projects
Projects with
with
Organizational
Organizational Strategy
Strategy
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–11
A
A Project
Project Management
Management Today:
Today:
A
A Socio-Technical
Socio-Technical Approach
Approach
• The Technical Dimension (The “Science”)
– Consists of the formal, disciplined, purely logical parts
of the process.
– Includes planning, scheduling, and controlling projects.
• The Sociocultural Dimension (The “Art”)
– Involves contradictory and paradoxical world of
implementation.
– Centers on creating a temporary social system within a
larger organizational environment that combines the
talents of a divergent set of professionals working to
complete the project.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–12
AASocio-Technical
Socio-Technical
Approach
ApproachtotoProject
Project
Management
Management
FIGURE 1.3
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–13
Key
Key Terms
Terms
Program
Project
Project life cycle
Project Management Professional (PMP)
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 1–14
Where
Where We
We Are
Are Now
Now
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–15
Why
Why Project
Project Managers
Managers Need
Need
to
to Understand
Understand Strategy
Strategy
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–16
The
The Strategic
Strategic Management
Management Process:
Process:
An
An Overview
Overview
• Strategic Management
– Requires every project to be clearly linked to strategy.
– Provides theme and focus of firm’s future direction.
• Responding to changes in the external environment—
environmental scanning
• Allocating scarce resources of the firm to improve its
competitive position—internal responses to new programs
– Requires strong links among mission, goals,
objectives, strategy, and implementation.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–17
Four
Four Activities
Activities of
of the
the Strategic
Strategic
Management
Management Process
Process
• Review and define the organizational mission
• Set long-range goals and objectives
• Analyze and formulate strategies to reach
objectives
• Implement strategies through projects
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–18
Strategic
Strategic
Management
Management
Process
Process
FIGURE 2.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–19
Characteristics
Characteristics of
of Objectives
Objectives
EXHIBIT 2.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–20
Benefits
Benefits of
of Project
Project Portfolio
Portfolio Management
Management
EXHIBIT 2.2
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–21
A
A Portfolio
Portfolio Management
Management System
System
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–22
Portfolio
Portfolio of
of Projects
Projects by
by Type
Type
FIGURE 2.2
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–23
A
A Portfolio
Portfolio Management
Management System
System
• Selection Criteria
– Financial models: payback, net present value (NPV)
– Non-financial models: projects of strategic
importance to the firm
• Multi-Criteria Selection Models
– Use several weighted selection criteria to evaluate
project proposals.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–24
Financial
Financial Models
Models
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–25
Financial
Financial Models
Models (cont’d)
(cont’d)
• The Net Present Value (NPV) Model
– Uses management’s minimum desired rate-of-return
(discount rate) to compute the present value of all net
cash inflows.
• Positive NPV: project meets minimum desired rate
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–26
Example
Example Comparing
Comparing Two
Two Projects
Projects
Using
Using Payback
Payback Method
Method
EXHIBIT 2.3A
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–27
Example
Example Comparing
Comparing Two
Two Projects
Projects
Using
Using Net
Net Present
Present Value
Value Method
Method
EXHIBIT 2.3b
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–28
Nonfinancial
Nonfinancial Strategic
Strategic Criteria
Criteria
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–29
Multi-Criteria
Multi-Criteria Selection
Selection Models
Models
• Checklist Model
– Uses a list of questions to review potential projects
and to determine their acceptance or rejection.
– Fails to answer the relative importance or value of a
potential project and doesn’t to allow for comparison
with other potential projects.
• Multi-Weighted Scoring Model
– Uses several weighted qualitative and/or quantitative
selection criteria to evaluate project proposals.
– Allows for comparison of projects with other potential
projects.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–30
Sample
Sample Selection
Selection Questions
Questions Used
Used in
in Practice
Practice
Topic Question
Strategy/alignment What specific strategy does this project align with?
Risk Where does the proposed project fit in our risk profile?
Benefits, value, ROI What is the value of the project to this organization?
EXHIBIT 2.4
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–31
Sample
Sample Selection
Selection Questions
Questions Used
Used in
in Practice
Practice
Topic Question
Organization culture Is our organization culture right for this type of project?
FIGURE 2.3
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–33
Applying
Applying aa Selection
Selection Model
Model
• Project Classification
– Deciding how well a strategic or operations project
fits the organization’s strategy
• Selecting a Model
– Applying a weighted scoring model to align projects
closer with the organization’s strategic goals
• Reduces the number of wasteful projects
• Helps identify proper goals for projects
• Helps everyone involved understand how
and why a project is selected
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–34
Applying
Applying aa Selection
Selection Model
Model (cont’d)
(cont’d)
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–35
A
A Proposal
Proposal Form
Form for
for
an
an Automatic
Automatic
Vehicular
Vehicular Tracking
Tracking
(AVL)
(AVL) Public
Public
Transportation
Transportation
Project
Project
FIGURE 2.4A
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–36
Risk
Risk
Analysis
Analysis for
for
500-Acre
500-Acre
Wind
Wind Farm
Farm
FIGURE 2.4B
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–37
Project
Project
Screening
Screening
Process
Process
FIGURE 2.5
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–38
Priority
Priority
Screening
Screening
Analysis
Analysis
FIGURE 2.6
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–39
Managing
Managing the
the Portfolio
Portfolio System
System
• Senior Management Input
– Provide guidance in selecting criteria that are
aligned with the organization’s strategic goals.
– Decide how to balance available resources among
current projects.
• The Governance Team Responsibilities
– Publish the priority of every project.
– Ensure that the project selection process is open
and free of power politics.
– Reassess the organization’s goals and priorities.
– Evaluate the progress of current projects.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–40
Balancing
Balancing the
the Portfolio
Portfolio for
for
Risks
Risks and
and Types
Types of
of Projects
Projects
• Bread-and-butter Projects
– Involve evolutionary improvements
to current products and services.
• Pearls
– Represent revolutionary commercial opportunities
using proven technical advances.
• Oysters
– Involve technological breakthroughs
with high commercial payoffs.
• White Elephants
– Showed promise at one time
but are no longer viable.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–41
Key
Key Terms
Terms
Implementation gap
Net present value
Organizational politics
Payback
Priority system
Priority team
Project portfolio
Project screening matrix
Project sponsor
Sacred cow
Strategic management process
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 2–42
Chapter
Chapter Four
Four
Defining the Project
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–43
Where
Where We
We Are
Are Now
Now
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–44
Defining
Defining the
the Project
Project
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–45
Step
Step 1:
1: Defining
Defining the
the Project
Project Scope
Scope
• Project Scope
– A definition of the end result or mission of the project
—a product or service for the client/customer
• Purposes of the Project Scope Statement
– To clearly define the deliverable(s) for the end user.
– To focus the project on successful completion
of its goals.
– To be used by the project owner and participants
as a planning tool and for measuring project success
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–46
Project
Project Scope
Scope Checklist
Checklist
1. Project objective
2. Deliverables
3. Milestones
4. Technical requirements
5. Limits and exclusions
6. Reviews with customer
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–47
Project
Project Scope:
Scope: Terms
Terms and
and Definitions
Definitions
• Scope Statements
– Also called statements of work (SOW)
• Project Charter
– Can contain an expanded version of scope statement.
– A document authorizing the project manager to initiate
and lead the project
• Scope Creep
– The tendency for the project scope to expand over
time due to changing requirements, specifications, and
priorities
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–48
Step
Step 2:
2: Establishing
Establishing Project
Project Priorities
Priorities
• Causes of Project Trade-offs
– Shifts in the relative importance of criterions related
to cost, time, and performance parameters
• Budget–Cost
• Schedule–Time
• Performance–Scope
• Managing the Priorities of Project Trade-offs
– Constrain: original parameter is a fixed requirement.
– Enhance: optimizing a criterion over others
– Accept: reducing (or not meeting) a criterion
requirement
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–49
Project
Project Management
Management Trade-offs
Trade-offs
FIGURE 4.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–50
Project
Project Priority
Priority Matrix
Matrix
FIGURE 4.2
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–51
Step
Step 3:
3: Creating
Creating the
the Work
Work
Breakdown
Breakdown Structure
Structure
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–52
Hierarchical
Hierarchical
Breakdown
Breakdown ofof the
the
WBS
WBS
FIGURE 4.3
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–53
How
How WBS
WBS Helps
Helps the
the Project
Project Manager
Manager
• WBS
– Facilitates evaluation of cost, time, and technical
performance of the organization on a project.
– Provides management with information appropriate
to each organizational level.
– Helps in the development of the organization
breakdown structure (OBS), which assigns project
responsibilities to organizational units and individuals
– Helps manage plan, schedule, and budget.
– Defines communication channels and assists
in coordinating the various project elements.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–54
Work
Work Breakdown
Breakdown Structure
Structure
FIGURE 4.4
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–55
Work
Work Packages
Packages
• A work package is the lowest level of the WBS.
– It is output-oriented in that it:
1. Defines work (what).
2. Identifies time to complete a work package (how long).
3. Identifies a time-phased budget to complete
a work package (cost).
4. Identifies resources needed to complete
a work package (how much).
5. Identifies a person responsible for units of work (who).
6. Identifies monitoring points for measuring success (how
well).
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–56
Step
Step 4:
4: Integrating
Integrating the
the WBS
WBS
with
with the
the Organization
Organization
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–57
Integration
Integration of
of
WBS and
WBS and OBSOBS
FIGURE 4.5
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–58
Step
Step 5:
5: Coding
Coding the
the WBS
WBS for
for
the
the Information
Information System
System
• WBS Coding System
– Defines:
• Levels and elements of the WBS
• Organization elements
• Work packages
• Budget and cost information
– Allows reports to be consolidated at
any level in the organization structure
• WBS Dictionary
– Provides detailed information about
each element in the WBS.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–59
Coding
Coding
the
the WBS
WBS
EXHIBIT 4.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–60
Process
Process Breakdown
Breakdown Structure
Structure (PBS)
(PBS) for
for
Software
Software Development
Development Project
Project
FIGURE 4.6
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–61
Responsibility
Responsibility Matrices
Matrices
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–62
Responsibility
Responsibility Matrix
Matrix for
for aa Market
Market Research
Research Project
Project
FIGURE 4.7
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–63
Responsibility
Responsibility Matrix
Matrix for
for the
the Conveyor
Conveyor Belt
Belt Project
Project
FIGURE 4.8
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–64
Project
Project Communication
Communication Plan
Plan
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–65
Developing
Developing aa Communication
Communication Plan
Plan
1. Stakeholder analysis
2. Information needs
3. Sources of information
4. Dissemination modes
5. Responsibility and timing
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–66
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Communications
Communications
FIGURE 4.9
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–67
Information
Information Needs
Needs
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–68
Shale
Shale Oil
Oil Research
Research Project
Project Communication
Communication Plan
Plan
FIGURE 4.10
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–69
Key
Key Terms
Terms
Cost account
Milestone
Organization breakdown structure (OBS)
Priority matrix
Process breakdown structure (PBS)
Project charter
Responsibility matrix
Scope creep
Scope statement
WBS dictionary
Work breakdown structure (WBS)
Work package
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 4–70
Chapter
Chapter Five
Five
Estimating Project Times and Costs
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–71
Where
Where We
We Are
Are Now
Now
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–72
Estimating
Estimating Projects
Projects
• Estimating
– The process of forecasting or approximating the time
and cost of completing project deliverables
– The task of balancing expectations of stakeholders
and need for control while the project is implemented
• Types of Estimates
– Top-down (macro) estimates: analogy, group
consensus, or mathematical relationships
– Bottom-up (micro) estimates: estimates of elements
of the work breakdown structure
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–73
Why
Why Estimating
Estimating Time
Time and
and Cost
Cost Is
Is Important
Important
EXHIBIT 5.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–74
Factors
Factors Influencing
Influencing the
the Quality
Quality of
of Estimates
Estimates
Planning
Planning
Horizon
Horizon
Other
Other Project
Project
(Nonproject)
(Nonproject) Complexity
Complexity
Factors
Factors
Quality of
Organization
Organization Estimates People
People
Culture
Culture
Padding
Padding Project
Project Structure
Structure
Estimates
Estimates and
and Organization
Organization
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–75
Estimating
Estimating Guidelines
Guidelines for
for Times,
Times,
Costs,
Costs, and
and Resources
Resources
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–76
Developing
Developing Work
Work Package
Package Estimates
Estimates
Use
Use people
people
familiar
familiar with
with
the
the tasks
tasks
Use
Use several
several
Include
Include aa risk
risk people
people to
to make
make
assessment
assessment estimates
estimates
Preparing
Preparing
Make
Make no
no Initial
Initial Assume
Assume normal
normal
allowance
allowance for
for Estimates
Estimates conditions
conditions
contingencies
contingencies
Assume
Assume tasks
tasks Use
Use consistent
consistent
are
are independent
independent time
time units
units
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–77
Top-Down
Top-Down versus
versus Bottom-Up
Bottom-Up Estimating
Estimating
• Top-Down Estimates
– Are usually derived from someone who uses
experience and/or information to determine the project
duration and total cost.
– Are sometimes made by top managers who have little
knowledge of the processes used to complete the
project.
• Bottom-Up Approach
– Can serve as a check on cost elements in the WBS
by rolling up the work packages and associated cost
accounts to major deliverables at the work package
level.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–78
Top-Down
Top-Down versus
versus Bottom-Up
Bottom-Up Estimating
Estimating
Top-down Bottom-up
Condition Estimates Estimates
- Strategic decision making X
- Cost and time important X
- High uncertainty X
- Internal, small project X
- Fixed-price contract X
- Customer wants details X
- Unstable scope X
TABLE 5.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–79
Estimating
Estimating Projects:
Projects: Preferred
Preferred Approach
Approach
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–80
Top-Down
Top-Down Approaches
Approaches for
for Estimating
Estimating Project
Project
Times
Times and
and Costs
Costs
• Consensus methods
• Ratio methods (sometimes
called parametric)
• Apportion method Project Estimate
Times
Costs
• Function point methods for
software and system projects
• Learning curves
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–81
Apportion
Apportion Method
Method of
of Allocating
Allocating Project
Project Costs
Costs
Using
Using the
the Work
Work Breakdown
Breakdown Structure
Structure
FIGURE 5.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–82
Simplified
Simplified Basic
Basic Function
Function Point
Point Count
Count Process
Process
for
for aa Prospective
Prospective Project
Project or
or Deliverable
Deliverable
TABLE 5.2
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–83
Example:
Example: Function
Function Point
Point Count
Count Method
Method
TABLE 5.3
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–84
Bottom-Up
Bottom-Up Approaches
Approaches for
for Estimating
Estimating
Project
Project Times
Times and
and Costs
Costs
• Template methods
• Parametric procedures
applied to specific tasks
• Range estimates for
the WBS work packages
• Phase estimating: A hybrid
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–85
Range
Range Estimating
Estimating Template
Template
FIGURE 5.2
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–86
Phase
Phase Estimating
Estimating over
over Product
Product Life
Life Cycle
Cycle
FIGURE 5.3
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–87
Top-Down
Top-Down and
and Bottom-Up
Bottom-Up Estimates
Estimates
FIGURE 5.4
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–88
Level
Level of
of Detail
Detail
• Direct Costs
– Costs that are clearly chargeable to a specific work
package.
• Labor, materials, equipment, and other
• Direct (Project) Overhead Costs
– Costs incurred that are directly tied to project
deliverables or work packages.
• Salary, rents, supplies, specialized machinery
• General and Administrative Overhead Costs
– Organization costs indirectly linked to a specific
package that are apportioned to the project.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–90
Contract
Contract Bid
Bid Summary
Summary Costs
Costs
FIGURE 5.5
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–91
Three
Three Views
Views of
of Cost
Cost
FIGURE 5.6
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–92
Refining
Refining Estimates
Estimates
• Reasons for Adjusting Estimates
– Interaction costs are hidden in estimates.
– Normal conditions do not apply.
– Things go wrong on projects.
– Changes in project scope and plans
– Overly optimistic
– Strategic misrepresentation
• Adjusting Estimates
– Time and cost estimates of specific activities are
adjusted as the risks, resources, and situation
particulars become more clearly defined.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–93
Estimating
Estimating Database
Database Templates
Templates
FIGURE 5.7
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–94
Mega
Mega Projects:
Projects: A
A Special
Special Case
Case
• Mega Projects
– Are large-scale, complex ventures that typically cost
$1 billion or more, take many years to complete, and
involve multiple private and public stakeholders.
• High-speed rail lines, airports, healthcare reform, the
Olympics, development of new aircraft
– Often involve a double whammy.
• Cost much more than expected but underdelivered on
benefits they were to provide.
– Are sometimes called “White Elephants”
• Over budget, under value, high cost of maintaining (exceeds
the benefits received)
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–95
Three
Three Steps
Steps of
of the
the Reference
Reference Class
Class
Forecasting
Forecasting (RCF)
(RCF) Process
Process
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–96
Key
Key Terms
Terms
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–97
WBS
WBS Figure
Figure
TABLE A5.1
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–99
Learning
Learning Curves
Curves Cumulative
Cumulative Values
Values
TABLE A5.2
.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 5–100