Design and

Development of
Autonomated
Chicken Slicing
Machine
Dinglasan, Karl Anthony A.

Cuevas, Junix Jhenvo A.

Falogme, Anthony M.

Bejasa, Sheena Gae

Fod, Mohammed A.

Comia, Abegail H.
Objectives
• Design and Develop Autnomated
Chicken Slicing Machine
• Material
• Component

• Tests:
• Functionality
• Production Rate
• Efficiency
• Quality
• Accuracy and Precision

• Operation and Maintenance Manual

Conceptual Frame Work
Scope and
Limitation of the
Study
 The machine can be operated by one user.

 The machine can be used to reduce worker workload.

 The machine can cut a whole chicken into four

portions, two breast parts and two thigh parts.

 The machine is accurate enough to produce quality

chicken cut ups.

Research Instruments
Used
This comprises the methods of collecting data to gather
enough information regarding this study, including:

• Document Revises
• Survey questionnaires
• Checklist.
 Quality Tests
QUESTIONS 5 4 3 2 1 9

Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor

8

6
1. The blade used in the machine   IIIIIII III    
5
1. The process of cutting the chicken I IIIII IIII    
4
1. The quality of the sliced chicken   IIIIIIII II    
3
1. The accuracy and the precision of the I IIII IIIII    
2
machine
1
1. The safety of the operator   II IIIIIII I  
0
TOTAL 2 26 21 1   1 2 3 4 5

Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor

 Quality Test
QUESTIONS YES NO

1. Do you think Autonomated Cutting Machine is safer than IIIIIIII II

Tally
Manual Cutting?

1. Will you prefer Autonomated Cutting Machine than Manual IIIIIIII II

Cutting?

1. Did you find the Machine more efficient than Manual Cutting? IIIIIIII II

1. Will you prefer to use Autonomated Cutting Machine in the IIIIIIIII I

future?

1. Are you satisfied with the output of the Autonomated Cutting IIIIIIIII I

Machine?

1. Do you find that the Autonomated Cutting Machine saves time IIIIIIIII I

than Manual Cutting

TOTAL 51 9 Yes No
DESIGN AND
CONCEPT
Proposed Design and Configurations
Parts and Functions
 Functionality Test
TRIAL RESET BLADE1 BUTTON2 BLADE2 BUTTON3 PUSHER

BUTTON

1 F F F NF F F

2 F F F NF F F

3 F F F F F F

4 F F F F F F

5 F F F F F F

% 100 100 100 60 100 100

OVER-ALL  
 
PERFORMANCE 93%
TRIAL MANUAL MACHINE Air Compressor’s Pressure

1 25s 6s 4 bar

2 18s 5s 4 bar

3 17s 4s 6 bar

4 10s 4s 6 bar

5 14s 4s 6 bar

AVERAGE 16.8s 4.6s  

Production Rate Test

 
Proposed Design:

Average mass of chicken is 2 kilograms.

A = LW

L=W

We proposed an area of chopping board to be .

 
Cylinder Specification:

Pressure =

*Considering 50% Factor of Safety

Force required to cut a chicken based on previous trials

is, using a bore of .

 

Approximately

Therefore, we chose to have an air compressor

that can provide for efficiency consideration and a

longer time of usage.