You are on page 1of 70

Chapter 6

Strategy Analysis & Choice

Strategic Management:
Concepts & Cases
11th Edition
Fred David

Ch 6 -1
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline

The Nature of Strategy & Choice

A Comprehensive
Strategy-Formulation Framework

The Input Stage

Ch 6 -2
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

The Matching Stage

The Decision Stage

Cultural Aspects of Strategy Choice

Ch 6 -3
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Chapter Outline (cont’d)

The Politics of Strategy Choice

Governance Issues

Ch 6 -4
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

To acquire or not to acquire, that is the


question –
Robert J. Terry

Life is full of lousy options –


General P.X. Kelley

Ch 6 -5
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Nature of Strategy Analysis & Choice

-- Establishing long-term objectives


-- Generating alternative strategies
-- Selecting strategies to pursue
-- Best alternative - achieve mission & objectives

Ch 6 -6
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice
Alternative Strategies Derive From --

 Vision
 Mission
 Objectives
 External audit
 Internal audit
 Past successful strategies

Ch 6 -7
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy Analysis & Choice

Generating Alternatives --

Participation in generating alternative


strategies should be as broad as
possible

Ch 6 -8
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Comprehensive Strategy-Formulation
Framework

Stage 1:
The Input Stage

Stage 2: Stage 3:
The Matching Stage The Decision Stage

Ch 6 -9
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
Internal Factor Evaluation
Matrix (IFE)

Stage 1: External Factor Evaluation


The Input Stage Matrix (EFE)

Competitive Profile Matrix


(CPM)

Ch 6 -10
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Stage 1: The Input Stage

Basic input information for the matching &


decision stage matrices
Requires strategists to quantify subjectivity
early in the process
Good intuitive judgment always needed

Ch 6 -11
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -12
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage

Match between organization’s internal


resources & skills and the opportunities & risks
created by its external factors

Ch 6 -13
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Stage 2: The Matching Stage

SWOT Matrix

Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats

Ch 6 -14
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix

Four Types of Strategies

Strengths-Opportunities (SO)
Weaknesses-Opportunities (WO)
Strengths-Threats (ST)
Weaknesses-Threats (WT)

Ch 6 -15
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SO Strategies

Strengths
Weaknesses Use a firm’s
internal strengths
Opportunities
to take advantage
Threats SO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT

Ch 6 -16
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
WO Strategies

Strengths
Weaknesses Improving internal
weaknesses by
Opportunities
taking advantage
Threats WO of external
Strategies opportunities
SWOT

Ch 6 -17
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
ST Strategies

Strengths Use a firm’s


Weaknesses strengths
Opportunities to avoid or
Threats ST reduce the impact
Strategies of external
threats
SWOT

Ch 6 -18
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
WT Strategies

Defensive tactics
Strengths aimed at reducing
Weaknesses internal
Opportunities weaknesses &
Threats WT avoiding
Strategies environmental
threats
SWOT

Ch 6 -19
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix

Developing the SWOT

List firm’s key internal Strengths


List firm’s key internal Weaknesses
List firm’s key external Opportunities
List firm’s key external Threats

Ch 6 -20
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SWOT Matrix
Strengths – S Weaknesses – W
Leave Blank
List Strengths List Weaknesses

Opportunities – O SO Strategies WO Strategies

Use strengths to take Overcoming weaknesses


List Opportunities advantage of by taking advantage of
opportunities opportunities

Threats – T ST Strategies WT Strategies

Use strengths to avoid Minimize weaknesses and


List Threats threats avoid threats

Ch 6 -21
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Matching Key Factors to Formulate Alternative Strategies

Key Internal Factor Key External Factor Resultant Strategy

20% annual growth in


Excess working capacity
+ the cell phone industry = Acquire Cellfone, Inc.
(strength)
(opportunity)

Exit of two major foreign Pursue horizontal integration


Insufficient capacity
+ competitors from the = by buying competitor's
(weakness)
industry (opportunity) facilities

Decreasing numbers of Develop new products for


Strong R&D (strength) + =
young adults (threat) older adults

Develop a new
Poor employee morale Strong union
+ = employee benefits
(weakness) activity (threat) package

Ch 6 -22
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Limitations with SWOT Matrix

 Does not show how to achieve a competitive


advantage
 Provides a static assessment in time
 May lead the firm to overemphasize a single
internal or external factor in formulating
strategies

Ch 6 -23
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -24
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix
Strategic Position & Action Evaluation Matrix

Aggressive
Conservative
Defensive
Competitive

Ch 6 -25
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix

Two Internal Dimensions

Financial Strength (FS)


Competitive Advantage (CA)

Ch 6 -26
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix

Two External Dimensions

Environmental Stability (ES)


Industry Strength (IS)

Ch 6 -27
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position

Financial Strength (FS) Environmental Stability (ES)

Technological changes
Return on investment
Rate of inflation
Leverage
Demand variability
Liquidity
Price range of competing products
Working capital
Barriers to entry
Cash flow
Competitive pressure
Price elasticity of demand
Ease of exit from market
Risk involved in business

Ch 6 -28
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SPACE Factors
Internal Strategic Position External Strategic Position

Competitive Advantage CA Industry Strength (IS)

Market share Growth potential


Product quality Profit potential
Product life cycle Financial stability
Customer loyalty Technological know-how
Competition’s capacity utilization Resource utilization
Technological know-how Ease of entry into market
Control over suppliers & distributors Productivity, capacity utilization

Ch 6 -29
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Steps to Developing a SPACE Matrix

1. Select a set of variables to define FS, CA,


ES, & IS
2. Assign a numerical value:
1. From +1 to +6 to each FS & IS dimension
2. From -1 to -6 to each ES & CA dimension
3. Compute an average score for each FS,
CA, ES, & IS

Ch 6 -30
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Steps to Developing a SPACE Matrix

1. Plot the average score on the appropriate


axis
2. Add the two scores on the x-axis and plot
the point. Add the two scores on the y-axis
and plot the point. Plot the intersection of
the new xy point
3. Draw a directional vector from the origin
through the new intersection point.

Ch 6 -31
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
SPACE Matrix
FS
Conservative Aggressive
+6
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1

CA IS
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6

-2
-3

-4
-5
Defensive Competitive
-6
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
ES Ch 6 -32
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -33
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Boston Consulting Group Matrix


Enhances multi-divisional firm in formulating
strategies
Autonomous divisions = business portfolio
Divisions may compete in different industries
Focus on market-share position & industry
growth rate

Ch 6 -34
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Relative Market Share Position

Ratio of a division’s own market share in an


industry to the market share held by the largest
rival firm in that industry

Ch 6 -35
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix
Relative Market Share Position
High Medium Low
1.0 .50 0.0

High
+20
Industry Sales Growth Rate

Stars Question Marks


II I
Medium
0

Cash Cows Dogs


III IV
Low
-20
Ch 6 -36
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Question Marks
Low relative market share – compete in high-
growth industry
Cash needs are high
Case generation is low

Decision to strengthen (intensive strategies) or


divest

Ch 6 -37
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Stars
High relative market share and high growth rate
Best long-run opportunities for growth & profitability

Substantial investment to maintain or


strengthen dominant position
Integration strategies, intensive strategies, joint
ventures

Ch 6 -38
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Cash Cows
High relative market share, competes in low-
growth industry
Generate cash in excess of their needs
Milked for other purposes

Maintain strong position as long as possible


Product development, concentric diversification
If weakens—retrenchment or divestiture

Ch 6 -39
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
BCG Matrix

Dogs

Low relative market share & compete in slow or


no market growth
Weak internal & external position

Liquidation, divestiture, retrenchment

Ch 6 -40
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -41
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
The Internal-External Matrix

 Positions an organization’s various divisions


in a nine-cell display
 Similar to BCG Matrix except the IE Matrix:
 Requires more information about the divisions
 Strategic implications of each matrix are different

Ch 6 -42
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -43
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
IE Matrix

 Based on two key dimensions


 The IFE total weighted scores on the x-axis
 The EFE total weighted scores on the y-axis
 Divided into three major regions
 Grow and build – Cells I, II, or IV
 Hold and maintain – Cells III, V, or VII
 Harvest or divest – Cells VI, VIII, or IX

Ch 6 -44
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -45
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework
SWOT Matrix

SPACE Matrix

Stage 2: BCG Matrix


The Matching Stage

IE Matrix

Grand Strategy Matrix

Ch 6 -46
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Tool for formulating alternative strategies


Based on two dimensions
Competitive position
Market growth

Ch 6 -47
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
RAPID MARKET GROWTH
Quadrant II Quadrant I
1. Market development 1. Market development
2. Market penetration 2. Market penetration
3. Product development 3. Product development
4. Horizontal integration 4. Forward integration
5. Divestiture 5. Backward integration
6. Liquidation 6. Horizontal integration
WEAK 7. Concentric diversification
STRONG
COMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE
POSITION Quadrant III Quadrant IV
POSITION
1. Retrenchment 1. Concentric diversification
2. Concentric diversification 2. Horizontal diversification
3. Horizontal diversification 3. Conglomerate
4. Conglomerate diversification
diversification 4. Joint ventures
5. Liquidation
SLOW MARKET GROWTH
Ch 6 -48
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant I

Excellent strategic position


Concentration on current markets/products
Take risks aggressively when necessary

Ch 6 -49
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant II

Evaluate present approach


How to improve competitiveness
Rapid market growth requires intensive strategy

Ch 6 -50
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant III

Compete in slow-growth industries


Weak competitive position
Drastic changes quickly
Cost & asset reduction (retrenchment)

Ch 6 -51
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Grand Strategy Matrix

Quadrant IV

Strong competitive position


Slow-growth industry
Diversification to more promising growth areas

Ch 6 -52
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Strategy-Formulation Analytical
Framework

Quantitative Strategic
Stage 3:
Planning Matrix
The Decision Stage
(QSPM)

Ch 6 -53
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
QSPM

Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix

Technique designed to determine the relative


attractiveness of feasible alternative actions

Ch 6 -54
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
QSPM Strategic Alternatives
Key External Factors Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3
Economy
Political/Legal/Governmental
Social/Cultural/Demographic/
Environmental
Technological
Competitive
Key Internal Factors
Management
Marketing
Finance/Accounting
Production/Operations
Research and Development
Computer Information
Systems

Ch 6 -55
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Steps to Develop a QSPM

1. Make a list of the firm’s key external


opportunities/threats and internal
strengths/weaknesses in the left column
2. Assign weights to each key external and
internal factor
3. Examine the Stage 2 (matching) matrices,
and identify alternative strategies that the
organization should consider implementing

Ch 6 -56
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Steps to Develop a QSPM

4. Determine the Attractiveness Scores


5. Compare the Total Attractiveness Scores
6. Compute the Sum Total Attractiveness
Score

Ch 6 -57
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
QSPM

Limitations

Requires intuitive judgments & educated


assumptions
Only as good as the prerequisite inputs

Ch 6 -58
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
QSPM

Advantages

Sets of strategies considered simultaneously or


sequentially
Integration of pertinent external & internal
factors in the decision making process

Ch 6 -59
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Cultural Aspects of Strategy
Choice

Organization Culture

Successful strategies depend on the degree of


consistency with the firm’s culture

Ch 6 -60
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice

Politics in Organizations

Management hierarchy
Career aspirations
Allocation of scarce resources

Ch 6 -61
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Politics of Strategy Choice

Political Tactics for Strategists

Equifinality
Satisfying
Generalization
Higher-order issues
Political access on important issues

Ch 6 -62
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Governance Issues

Board of Directors Roles & Responsibilities

Control & oversight over management


Adherence to legal prescriptions
Consideration of stakeholder interests
Advancement of stockholder rights

Ch 6 -63
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Corporate Governance Issues

Business Week’s “Principles of Good Governance”

1. No more than 2 directors are current or former company


executives
2. No directors do business with the company
3. Audit, compensation, and nominating committees made up
of outside directors
4. Each director owns a large equity stake in the company
5. At least one outside director with extensive experience
6. Fully employed directors sit on no more than 4 boards –
Retirees on no more than 7
7. Each director attends at lest 75% of all meetings

Ch 6 -64
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Corporate Governance Issues

Business Week’s “principles of good governance”

8. Board meets regularly without management present


9. Audit committee meets at least four times a year
10. Board is frugal on executive pay, diligent in CEO succession,
and prompt to act when trouble arises
11. CEO is not also the Chairperson of the Board
12. Shareholders have considerable power and information to
choose & replace directors
13. Stock options are considered a corporate expense
14. No interlocking directorships

Ch 6 -65
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Aggressive Quadrant Business Portfolio

Attractiveness Scores
Cash Cows
(AS)

Competitive Advantage
Boards of Directors
(CA)

Boston Consulting
Competitive Quadrant
Group (BCG) Matrix

Ch 6 -66
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Conservative Quadrant Dogs

Environmental Stability
Culture
(ES)

Financial Strength
Defensive Quadrant
(FS)

Directional Vector Governance

Ch 6 -67
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Internal-External (IE)
Grand Strategy Matrix
Matrix

Halo Error Matching

Industry Strength
Matching Stage
(IS)

Quantitative Strategic
Input Stage
Planning Matrix (QSPM)

Ch 6 -68
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Question Marks Stars

Relative Market Share Strategic Position & Action


Position Evaluation (SPACE)

Sum Total Attractiveness


SO Strategies
Score (STAS)

ST Strategies Sustainability

Ch 6 -69
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
For Review (Chapter 6)

Key Terms & Concepts

Strengths, Weaknesses
WO Strategies
Opportunities, Threats SWOT

Total Attractiveness
WT Strategies
Scores (TAS)

Ch 6 -70
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall

You might also like