Professional Documents
Culture Documents
management
Sponsorship Direct
Underwriting Marketing
Sales Internet
Promotions
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertising Budget
Sales Response
Marginal Analysis
Models
Marginal analysis
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Budget Adjustments
Increase
Increase If
If the
the cost
cost is
is less
less than
than the
the
Spending
Spending marginal
marginal return
return
Hold
Hold If
If the
the cost
cost is
is equal
equal to
to the
the
Spending
Spending incremental
incremental return
return
Decrease If
If the
the cost
cost is
is more
more than
than the
the
Decrease incremental
Spending
Spending incremental return
return
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assumptions for Marginal Analysis
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sales Response Models
A. Concave-Downward B. S-Shaped Response
Response Curve Function
Incremental Sales
Incremental Sales
Initial Spending
High Spending
Middle Level
Little Effect
Little Effect
High Effect
Range A Range B Range C
Advertising Expenditures Advertising Expenditures
Source: Belch and Belch, Advertising and Promotion
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Factors Influencing Advertising Budgets
Product Product
durability price
Purchase
Differentiation frequency
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Budgeting approaches
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Top-Down Budgeting Methods
Affordable
Affordable
Method
Method
Return
Return on
on Arbitrary
Arbitrary
Top
Top
Investment
Investment Allocation
Allocation
Management
Management
Competitive
Competitive Percentage
Percentage
Parity
Parity of
of Sales
Sales
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Affordable method
Concerns
• No theoretical basis underlies the budgeting process.
• No systematic thinking
• No criteria set
• Based upon intuition or judgment
Percentage of sales
Two method
• Straight percentage of sales
• Percentage of unit cost
Disadvantages
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Competitive parity
Disadvantages
• Ignores individual company objectives
• Competitors might change method
Return on investment
Isolate
Isolate objectives
objectives
Determine
Determine tasks
tasks required
required
Estimate
Estimate required
required expenditures
expenditures
Monitor
Monitor
Reevaluate
Reevaluate objectives
objectives
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Payout Planning
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Share of Voice Effect
Share of Voice
Decrease–find
Decrease–find aa
High
Competitor’s
Increase
Increase to
to defend
defend
defensible
defensible niche
niche
Attack
Attack with
with large
large Maintain
Maintain modest
modest
SOV
SOV premium spending
spending premium
Low
premium premium
Low High
Your Share of Market
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Organizational Characteristics
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Suggestive Reading
Also refer to :