This document discusses the concepts of ethnocentrism and cultural relativism. It defines ethnocentrism as judging other cultures based on one's own cultural standards, and cultural relativism as considering cultural practices in their own context rather than from one's own perspective. The document then presents Milton Bennett's model of intercultural sensitivity, which proposes stages individuals move through - from ethnocentric views to more ethnorelative perspectives - as their intercultural competence develops.
This document discusses the concepts of ethnocentrism and cultural relativism. It defines ethnocentrism as judging other cultures based on one's own cultural standards, and cultural relativism as considering cultural practices in their own context rather than from one's own perspective. The document then presents Milton Bennett's model of intercultural sensitivity, which proposes stages individuals move through - from ethnocentric views to more ethnorelative perspectives - as their intercultural competence develops.
This document discusses the concepts of ethnocentrism and cultural relativism. It defines ethnocentrism as judging other cultures based on one's own cultural standards, and cultural relativism as considering cultural practices in their own context rather than from one's own perspective. The document then presents Milton Bennett's model of intercultural sensitivity, which proposes stages individuals move through - from ethnocentric views to more ethnorelative perspectives - as their intercultural competence develops.
What is Ethnocentrism? A perspective of the world in which we consider our own culture to be the measure of everything. We put our culture in the “center” of the world and we judge others to be right or wrong based on how far apart or close they are to our own perspective. An example of an Ethnocentric view
• In some countries people drive on the right
and in others they drive on the left. To consider that those who drive in the opposite direction to us are wrong, is to loose sight of the context. Ethnocentrism What is Cultural Relativism? Considering cultural practices as relative to context rather than imposing our own frame of reference (judging based on our experience).
• Someone with an ethnorelative view will try
and think about a cultural practice from the perspective of the culture in question rather than judging based on their own experience. An example of a Culturally relative view • In Arabic the writing is different to English and other European languages as you read from right to left.
Rather than viewing writing from right to left as
“wrong” the person views it simply as different. They recognize that their own culture is one of many cultures with different practices and traditions. Ethnocentric Vs. Culturally relative Ethnocentric Culturally relative • Judging other cultures using • Considering other cultures your own experience as a and practices relative to the measure of what is normal. context. • Anything outside of your • Not imposing a judgement experience or knowledge is based on the experience judged abnormal, weird or and knowledge of your wrong. culture. Where do we see this in practice? • Have you ever noticed that travel guide books often have information about cultural practices and behaviour that is considered disrespectful?
This information is provided to develop
awareness about different practices and beliefs, in other words to help people develop intercultural competence. What is intercultural competence? Intercultural competence is the ability to communicate effectively and appropriately with people of other cultures.
• Test your intercultural competencies! http://
www.areyouintercultural.eu Milton Bennett’s Model of Intercultural Sensitivity What’s the idea? Based on Bennett’s research the model attempts to explain different stances people can inhabit on a spectrum from an ethnocentric viewpoint to an ethnorelative one.
With experience and knowledge of cultural
differences, people may move along the spectrum and their ability to engage in respectful intercultural communication is enhanced. They will improve their intercultural competence. Denial • Denial of cultural difference indicates an experience in which cultural difference is not perceived at all, or it is perceived only in very broad categories such as "foreigner" or "minority." The constructs available for perceiving one's own culture are far more complex than those available for other cultures. Individuals experience psychological and/or physical isolation from cultural difference.
People are disinterested or perhaps even hostilely
dismissive of intercultural communication. Defense • Defense against cultural difference indicates an experience in which cultural difference is perceived in stereotyped and polarized ways. Cultures are organized into "us and them," where typically the "us" is superior and the "them" is inferior.
People at Defense are threatened by cultural
difference, so they tend to be highly critical of other cultures and apt to blame cultural difference for general ills of society. Reversal • Reversal, one's own culture is heavily criticized, while other cultures are perceived in relatively non-critical, romanticized ways. The intercultural worldview is still polarized, but the poles are reversed.
People at Reversal view other cultures as
better than their own. Minimization • Minimization of cultural difference indicates an experience in which elements of one's own cultural worldview are perceived as universal.
People assume that their own physical or psychological experiences
are shared by people in all cultures, and/or that certain basic values and beliefs transcend cultural boundaries. The stressing of cross-cultural similarity reduces Defense, so people here are much more tolerant of superficial cultural diversity. However, Minimization obscures deep cultural differences, including the masking of dominant culture privilege by a false assumption of equal opportunity ie. The assumption is made that everyone has the same opportunity to access resources like schools or jobs even though this may not be the case as a result of cultural difference eg. having a different religion Acceptance • Acceptance of cultural difference indicates an experience in which one's own culture is experienced as just one of a number of equally complex worldviews. Acceptance does not mean agreement - cultural difference may be judged negatively - but the judgment is not ethnocentric.
People at Acceptance are curious about and respectful
toward cultural difference, but their knowledge of other cultures does not yet allow them to easily adapt their behavior to different cultural contexts. Adaptation • Adaptation to cultural difference indicates the experience of generating appropriate alternative behavior in a different cultural context. Adaptation involves intercultural empathy, or experiencing the world to some extent "as if" one were participating in the different culture. This imaginative participation generates "feelings of appropriateness" that guide the generation of authentic behavior in the alternative culture.
People at adaptation can enact their intercultural
sensitivity as intercultural communication competence. Integration • Integration of cultural difference indicates an experience of self that is expanded to include the movement in and out of different cultural worldviews.
People with a predominant Integration position
often are dealing with issues related to their own "cultural liminality," or in-betweeness. This liminality can be used to construct cultural bridges and to conduct sophisticated cross-cultural mediation.