Industry Analysis

Universities at the forefront

Agree

Disagree

No Opinion

100%
University serving the Banking Industry

Very Well

Quite Well

Poor

Very Poor

100% No opinion
 Graduates joining the Banking Industry

Ver Well Equipped

Fairly well equipped
50% 50% Not very well equipped
Not at all equipped
No opinion
Summer Placement/Internship

Yes
No

100%
 Average Ranking of Reasons
4.5
4
4

3.5

3 2.75
2.5
2.5

1.5 1.25

0.5
0
0
Teachers not Curricula not been Education not vey Students lack core Other
updated with new updated regularly business oriented competencies to
technologies fulfil Industry
requirements
 Average Ranking of Solutions
4
3.5
3.5 3.25

3 2.75 2.75

2.5

2 1.75

1.5

0.5
0
0
 Average Ranking of Skills
5
4.5
4.5 4.25

4 3.75 3.75 3.75

3.5 3.5 3.5
3.5 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25
3 3 3
3 2.75 2.75
2.5
2.5

1.5

0.5
0 0
0
cy cy e s ty s t e e
ns ns nc es m i ll
s
i ll
s
il l
s
vi in
g
ill en tiv ud ar
n
i li
ty
er
1
er
2
t io tio era era e n t ea s k s k s k ti l v s k m i a i t l e b h h
a t id e a it t ia t t
ic ic
a Li um nf ar fa al al ip re so on m In
it at to el O O
n n N o w o n i c h C m ti o ' n R
u u c la ar
t
at
io yt ns bl
e
tia co
m d si
o
m
m
m
m
e lf c ia p i s n al tio o o d a n s
S r eg a
o co er as n A la P an 'C P
alc n m k rga t re N e
r t e m or O n iv
O rit Co w li e l dr
W t o C a
li it
y
s on
r
Ab Pe
 Ranking of Continuing Education Programs for Students
5 4.75

4.5

3.5
3
3 2.75
2.5
2.5 2.25

1.5 1.25 1.25

1 1
1

0.5
0
0
g y n s 1
ar o m ce io
n ce in ud ti o m r
in ro en at en d t c ra he
m s er t er e a ts r u og O
t
se as nf en nf
r
en st r
cl o es o nt d i n P
c
pr le
c de pe
n
a l ed
e n is
o T e e du al
i de dep I nd iv
i
eci
V I n I nd Sp
 Average Ranking of Selection Criteria
4.5 4.25

3.5 3.25 3.25 3.25

3 3 3 3
3 2.75

2.5 2.25
2 2
2

1.5

0.5
0
0
l er
ew ed ti es oo or
k
ke
n
ke
n
ke
n CV ke
n
in
g ew
vi ay vi h w a a a of a rn rvi th
r l it c t t t rt O
te sp ac
s of s t
de
r n de le
a te
in d i m
e
l d ect jec n t io n e r in
at ic r j b u ta u u
ill
s sa o ub su ts tin fo
c e k em m e
w s f c s en n ce n n
d f je o
an lS a fr
o h
ro
o
Pr
e ie co ti
rm t ia - ac s oft u job
p ro
per d a ra
rf
o n
on te g o to l ex an p
se da in rig i ca n re
Pe Es N di
nd ic c e
c t
o r k ar
f p
an ta m an ra W le lo
c rs e ev P t o e
of d l v
e nde A ca Re ess Le
c
an
U gn
m l l in
or W
i
e rf
P
 Average Ranking of Least Desirable Characteristic
4
3.5
3.5

3
2.5
2.5
2 2 2
2

1.5
1 1 1
1 0.75 0.75

0.5
0
0
t s
de ill
s m e en e ns ll s e ll er
it tu k as nc ng io i nc ki th
S i ga it m a
ca
t Sk e S O
t n us ro Ch i k nf
id
hi
p
orA tio th Ar m
m
or lif or o s
a n a w r
Po ic ,E Co es u lf ‐
c e
un n of g c
Q
eam Se ead
io n i
m
m at ck lle em orT of ofL
o it v L a a d k
C o h
ca Po c k
of M ptC A La L ac
f or
c k o ce
La ck Ac Po
a
L to
i ty
il
xib
fl e
In
 Perception of Training

25%

As an expense

As a reward

As a key
developmental tool

Other
75%
Bank has formal training program for staff

Yes No

100%
Training Programs support the mission of the Bank

Yes No

100%
Training Programs Mandatory for each staff

25%

Yes

No

75%
Training Programs regularly evaluated

Yes

No

100%
 Objectives for Training

Improve the performance in

present roles
Prepare staff for future roles
11%
11% 33% Enable staff to adapt to meet the
upcoming needs
Maintain and enhance the
quality of service in all areas
Support and personal education
development
Increase Job Satisfaction
22% Creating a pool of readily
22% available replacements
Building efficient and motivated
team
Other
 Analysing Training Needs

14%
Performance Reviews by
supervisor
Surveys
Interviews
Customer Feedback
29% 57% Performance Tests
Other
 Training Methods

On the job

50% 50%

Off the job

Both
 On the Job Training Techniques

Orientations
13%

13% Job Instruction Training

Apprenticeships
50%

Internships and
Assistantships

Job Rotation
25%

Coaching

Other
 Off the Job Training Techniques

Lectures
17%
33%
Special Study

Films, Television
conferences
17%

Case Studies

Role Playing

Simulation
17% 17%

Programmed
Instruction
Follow-up system to training course

Yes

No

100%
 Training Conducted

20%

In-House

Outside

80%
 On the Job Training Conducted By

33%

Supervisor

Bank Trainer

67% Outside Instructor

 Ranking of Skills Training
4
3.5
3.5

2.5 2.25

1.5 1.25 1.25

1
1 0.75 0.75

0.5
0
0
n lls l ls lls es
s e ns er
tio i i i nc it o th
a sk sk sk i n i e O
if i c
al ft s s er la
al ic so es bu xp gu
n e e
qu hn g s i th re r
al
c in bu to st
n te op of c te
o ng el ng g se l a
si pi ev pi in
es o D o nd oa
d ith
of el el ta Br r w
pr ev ev er
s li a
g D D d i
nin Un fa
m
ai g
bt in
O Be
 Ranking of Continuing Education Programs for Bank Staff
4
3.75

3.5

2.5

1.5

1
1

0.5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
r g y n s 1
a m ce n ce in d
ti o am r
in oo n ti o n d tu he
m s
r r e ta re e a t s
r u c gr t
se as nf
e n fe tr en st o O
cl es
e n n pr
co co en nd i
ed
pr l e n d e al il s
o Te pe ep id
u
a
i de e I n d
iv ci
V I nd I n d
Sp
e
 Problems with Training

Topics that would help

25% 25%
are not offered

Timings not convenient

Locations not
convenient

Too expensive

Poor quality of
50% instruction

Other