Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and under the influence, of drugs. But then some young people commit
house, grand theft auto, even murder, and rape. Children of all ages
Unless the parent assisted in helping the child commit the crime –underage drinking
drug usage, for example – the adult should never be held responsible for the child’s
actions. If a kid gets in trouble, it’s easy to blame the parents, attribute the mishap to
how they were raised, the kind of family they were born to.
Should Parents Be Responsible for the
Crimes of Their Children?
But that is what is wrong with this country: no one takes responsibility for their
own actions, especially if they’re minors. It’s a major problem. This way, people
become adults never being accountable for anything – they just blame it on
someone else. This isn’t the way to go; all it does is condition someone that they
are not going to face consequences when the do wrong.
Should Parents Be Responsible for the
Crimes of Their Children?
- My Group Position :
A child's actions are a direct result of the child's parents. I believe if a child commits
a crime, the parents are responsible financial and legally. Usually child's action build
up to the point of a crime, parents should stop and step in before the police and
justice system step in.If parents are acting irresponsible in front of their kids then the
kids will think its okay. So all they have to do is act responsible and be a good
example it really isn't that hard. The only reason they would not be a good example
would be if their parents acted bad?
Should Parents Be Responsible for the
Crimes of Their Children?
Children are a product of the environment in which they are raised. Parents
should bear some responsibility for the kind of person they unleash into the
world. A lot of crimes would be diminished if the child's home life were
intact.