to convince the reader to agree with the point of view or perspective of the author. Tools of persuasion such as pathos and logos helps make writing convincing. Using Pathos and Logos While pathos appeals to the emotions of the reader, logos appeals to reason and logic The effective use of pathos allows the writer to connect emotionally and to sway the latter to take the writer’s side. Essential to pathos is language. When chosen carefully, words can stir up powerful feelings in the reader and elicit the emotional response intended by the writer Using Pathos and Logos In one of his epistles, Horace (65 BC-8BC), revered as one of the greatest Roman poets and also known for his works of prose, expertly uses language and pathos in declaring how country life is preferable to city life Using Pathos and Logos If we must live suitably with nature, and a plot of ground is to be first sought to raise a house upon, do you know any place preferable to the blissful country? Is there any spot where the winters are more temperate? Where a more agreeable breeze moderates the rage of the Dog-star, and the season of the Lion, when once that furious sign has received the scorching sun? Is there a place where envious care less disturbs or slumbers? Is the grass inferior in smell or beauty to the Libyan pebbles? Is the water, which strives to burst the lead in the streets, purer than that which trembles in murmurs down its sloping channel? Why, trees are nursed along the variegated columns [ of the city ]; and that house is commended, which has a prospect of distant fields. You may drive out nature with a fork, yet still she will return, and insensibly victorious, will break through [ men’s ] improper disgusts Using Pathos and Logos Logos consists in supporting the writer’s stand or position through sound evidence in the form of examples, facts, statistics, or expert opinions. In another epistles. Horace asserts how Homer is a better philosopher than others. To support his assertion. Horace cites evidence from Homer’s epic Using Pathos and Logos While you, great Lollius, declaim at Rome, I at Praeneste have perused over again the writer of the Trojan war, the writer of the Trojan war; who teaches more clearly, and better than Chrysippus and Crantor, what is honorable, what shameful, what profitable, what not so. If nothing hinders you, here why I have thus concluded. The story is which, on account of Paris’ intrigue, Greece is started to be wasted in a tedious war with the barbarians, contains the tumults of foolish princes and people. Aantenor gives his opinion for cutting off the cause of war. What does Paris? He cannot be brought to comply, [though it be in order] that he may reign safe, and live happy. Nestor ;labors to compose the differences between Achilles and Agamemnon: love inflames one; rage both in common. The Greeks suffer for what their princes act foolishly. Within the walls of Ilium, and without, enormities are committed by sedition, treachery, injustice, and lust and rage Again to show what virtue and what wisdom can do, he has propounded Ulysses and instructive pattern: who, having subdued Troy wisely got an insight into the constitutions and customs of many nations; and, while for himself and his associates he is contriving a return, endured many hardships on the spacious sea, not to be sunk by all the waves of adversity