The document discusses various management theories including the theory of cooperation, group theories, value theory, and McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y. It describes the theory of cooperation as defining an organization as people able to communicate and contribute to a common purpose. Group theories are discussed in the context of how group behavior and norms influence employee motivation. Theory X posits that rigid structures lead to worker apathy while Theory Y assumes workers are ambitious and creative and management should structure work to leverage these motivations.
The document discusses various management theories including the theory of cooperation, group theories, value theory, and McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y. It describes the theory of cooperation as defining an organization as people able to communicate and contribute to a common purpose. Group theories are discussed in the context of how group behavior and norms influence employee motivation. Theory X posits that rigid structures lead to worker apathy while Theory Y assumes workers are ambitious and creative and management should structure work to leverage these motivations.
The document discusses various management theories including the theory of cooperation, group theories, value theory, and McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y. It describes the theory of cooperation as defining an organization as people able to communicate and contribute to a common purpose. Group theories are discussed in the context of how group behavior and norms influence employee motivation. Theory X posits that rigid structures lead to worker apathy while Theory Y assumes workers are ambitious and creative and management should structure work to leverage these motivations.
covers a wide variety of different things which have in common only the element of generalized conceptualization, the two most important functions of which are the facilitation of description and analysis. The Theory of Cooperation
This theory defines a “foreman organization as
any cooperative system in which there are persons able to communicate with each other, and who are willing to contribute action toward a conscious common purpose.” This theory is attributed to Chester Bernard, acknowledged spiritual father of the social systems school. Somewhat similar to this theory is the so-called coordinative principle. As coordination the all-inclusive principle of organization, it must have its own principles and foundation in authority, or the supreme coordinating power. A true coordination must be based on a real community of interest in the attainment of the desired objective. Like Barnard, Herbert Simon who like the former is associated with the social systems school, views organization “as systems of interdependent activity, encompassing at least several primary groups.” These are usually characterized by a high degree of rational direction of behavior toward ends that are objects of common knowledge on the part of the participants. Group Theories
Ofequal interest to the study of
management is known as group theories. According to Elton Mayo, there exists an important influence of group behavior on employee motivation and productivity on the recognition that man is a social being and acts in accordance with the accepted norms of the group to which he belongs. For his part, Rensis Likert contribuited a number of group-related theories, one of which deals with the effect of “employee-centered” versus “task- centered” supervisors on work-group productivity. There is observed a higher level productivity when supervisors are concerned with the welfare of the workers than where their immediate concern is getting the jobs done. Value Theory
Unless management places important values to
the individual workingman’s needs while striving for the attainment of the goals of the company, initiative, creativity and willingness to work will suffer if not altogether disappear. Thus, under that atmosphere, workers will not feel that it is important to do a good job. Cris Argyris, George Straus and others have developed the value theory through the use of “personality versus organization” hypothesis with respect to human motivation in industry. Theory X and Theory Y
Inasmuch as Douglas McGregor’s
Theory X and Theory Y model of managerial philosophy has had a distinctive impact upon managerial thinking, said theories deserve separate treatment. The theory X philosophy contends that by rigidly structuring the work of the worker and removing from him the power of making decisions as well as initiative, just as he is compelled to do a series of repetitive work, the ultimate result is apathy, that is, dissatisfaction with his job, As such, he becomes indifferent, if not hostile to organizational goals. The Theory Y, on the other hand, makes the assumption that workers are by their very nature, ambitious, trustworthy, creative, and energetic. For this reason, management has the bounden duty to restructure by itself the work situation in order to make use of such motivations to produce. Activity
1. Which of the following theories do you believe most?
2. In your own opinion, which of the following theories will best apply to most organization? Why? 3. Will the absence of one theory affect the organizations performance? Why? 4. Site an example of an organization with best practices and assess what theory or theories are being applied.