Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4.
4.
Theoretical
Theoretical
3. Problem
3. Problem Framework
Definition Framework
Definition 5.5. 6.6.
Research
Researchproblem
problem 7. Data Collection
Variables Generation Scientific
Scientific 7. Data Collection
delineated Variables Generation Analysis, and
delineated clearly ofof Research Analysis, and
clearly Research Interpretation
identified Hypothesis Design
Design Interpretation
identified Hypothesis
and
and
2. Preliminary labelled
labelled
2. Preliminary
Data Gathering
Data Gathering
Interviewing
Interviewing
Literature survey
Literature survey
8. Deduction
8. Deduction
Hypotheses substantiated?
Hypotheses substantiated?
Research question answered?
Research question answered?
Hypotheses
A hypothesis is a statement of the
researcher’s idea or guess.
4
Research Hypotheses
Research Hypothesis: A statement of the
relationship among two or more variables or
groups.
The acceptance or non-acceptance of which
is based on resolving a logical alternative
with a null hypothesis.
H0: µ1 = µ2 H1: µ1 ≠ µ2
7
Example
9
For Example
Some null hypotheses may be:
“there is no difference in male and female
leadership styles”.
12
Avoiding Decision Errors
We always run the risk that we will observe a rare
event, and we will draw the wrong conclusion.
Guilty”
Fail to Reject Correct Type II
Presumption
of Innocence
Error
(Not Guilty
Verdict)
Decision Errors in Testing
In scientific research, keep in mind that it is the null
hypothesis that is tested, and then the null hypothesis is
either confirmed or refuted (sometimes phrased as
rejected or not rejected)
Type I error
a true null hypothesis is rejected .There was no actual
relation but we accept that there is a relation
Type II error
The error that occurs when one accepts a null
hypothesis that is actually false. The researcher fails
to reject the null hypothesis when it should be
rejected. There was a relation but we accepted that
there is no relation.
Example of Null & Alternative
In a research study investigating the effects of a newly developed medication on
blood pressure levels
the null hypothesis would predict that there will be no difference in terms
of blood pressure levels between the group that receives the medication
(i.e., the experimental group) and the group that does not receive the
medication (i.e., the control group).
By contrast, the alternate hypothesis would predict that there will be a
difference between the two groups with respect to blood pressure levels.
So, for example, The blood pressures were taken after exercise and the results
show after medication the blood pressure were lowered where in fact the
blood pressure was lowered due to rest if we reject the true hypothesis that
there is no difference between both groups we are making type 1 error
Similarly since null hypothesis predicts that the group that receives the new
medication will experience the same results in terms of blood pressures as the
control group. lets say after medication their blood pressure is normal but the
control group was taken from the people who didn't have any hypertension so
their blood pressure was naturally normal so the researcher commits type 2
error by saying there is no difference between control and experimental
group where as the blood pressure was lowered by the drug. So a false null
hypothesis is accepted
Discussion 2
A researcher wants to examine the value of electronic
commerce for small businesses. The question is whether
or not the investment is of value. The researcher sets up
a web site with a fictitious business selling a special
printer attachment. The researcher asks those who visit
the site to fill in a specially designed form and return it
via the internet. The researcher will count how many
people visit the site and look at the answers to particular
questions on the form which relate to usability of the
site and whether or not they would buy goods in this
way.
Question Case Study 1