Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Objectivity
• Certainty
• Universality
THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
• Gender relations (interactions and power balances) are a key dynamic of all societies.
• Sexual organisation of society (the sexual division of labour, the distinctions between public and private realms, the
relations between procreation and desire, the natures of families) is integral to every conception of social structure and
social change
• Women's situation or status is a social matter and not a natural phenomenon and is therefore capable of being
historically analysed
• The mere fact of being a woman, at any time in any place, means having a particular kind of social and hence
historical experience.
• There is no history of a ‘Woman’. (Intersectionality)
• Lived experiences of men or work of male historians cannot be expected to communicate for womxn.
• Women’s history is not the same as Men’s history.
DISAPPEARING WOMAN
• Judith Bennett.
• Feminist approach to Medieval History.
• Long Duree perspective to understand lack of transformation in women’s status
in comparison to men, over time.
SOURCES
• Matthews, Jill. “Feminist History.” Labour History, no. 50, 1986, pp. 147–
153. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/27508788. Accessed 5 Dec. 2020.
• "Pedersen, Susan. "The Future of Feminist History"". Retrieved 6 October 2014.
• Bennett, Judith M. History Matters: Patriarchy and the Challenge of Feminism.
University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhtgm. Accessed 5 Dec. 2020.
• Nair, Janaki. “The Troubled Relationship of Feminism and History.” Economic
and Political Weekly, vol. 43, no. 43, 2008, pp. 57–65.,
www.jstor.org/stable/40278103. Accessed 5 Dec. 2020.