Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Industry - 602
Team Andrews
2019033 - Pavan Rao
2019038 - Rahul Kumar
2019040 - Rohit Naik
2019041 - Sai Jyothirmayee Voloju
2019045 - Siddesh Naik
2019051 - Tanmay Bastikar
1. Summarize the results of 8 Rounds in one slide? What is your view
on your performance in the 8 rounds?
● Giving the cheapest product in the industry for all the segment
● Making automation maximum for Low(10) and Trad(8) and for the remaining 3 keeping it at 5
● Keeping a cash balance of above 15 million
● Investing maximum possible amount in TQM from start
● Keeping A/R at 60 days and A/P at 30 days
● Buying capacity when 2nd shift utilisation crossed 50%
● Investing 4 million in recruitment spend and 80 hours of training to reduce turnover rate and increase
efficiency
4. Mention unexpected events that took place over the rounds. Did
you change your objectives at this point of time, if yes, do you feel
vindicated at the end of round 8?
● Huge emergency loan of 24 million in the first round due to forecasting too much for low and trad,
mistake was using practice rounds data as reference which was deadly as competitors got smarter
● Labour negotiations in the 7th round failed miserably as we tried to match the demands whereas others
far exceeded the labour wages as a result of which ours was lower and lot of days were lost in strike
● R&D for 2 of our products was supposed to get over in December but due to some glitch product release
skipped one year as a result of which products were not competitive
Impact
● After the emergency loan in the first round we became cautious and forecasted less which led to many
stock outs
5. Name the competitor(s) who you were most alert about in different
segments, functional areas and financial parameters, why?
Ferris
● Our prime focus was on traditional and low segments to earn profits as margins could be
greater in these segments and costs can be lower
● Ferris was already out of the trad segment by 5th round and it was evident that their main
focus was high end and size segments
● Their financials were looking weak by 5th round
7. How did your team approach the recession round?
● We were conservative in our entire approach as we just saw to the segments where we stocked out
in previous rounds
● Increasing our sales and promo budget for the segment we were not performing well
● Keeping forecasting low
● We kept our A/R at 60 days and A/P at 30 days
8. How did your team deal with the labor negotiations round?
● Broad Differentiators
● We grew capacity to meet the demand that we generated. After our products were well positioned,
we investigated modest increases in automation levels to improve margins.
● We kept our existing product line, maintained a presence in every segment. Our goal was to offer
customers products that matched their ideal criteria for positioning, age, and reliability.
Changes
1. Maximise automation levels in 1st round
2. Avoid being cost leader since the start -Avoid emergency loan
3. Being conservative in terms of forecasting in initial rounds
14.Describe methods by which you arrived at consensus. (Did you go
for role allocation to bring in element of ownership and
accountability, if no, why not?
● Did not adopt for role allocation - Learn about every department
Six different views
To arrive at a consensus
1. Transferring the data to excel sheet
2. Detailed study of previous round’s courier
3. Analysis of peer data
4. In case of differing opinions -Average of every member’s decision was taken
EXCEL SHEET
THANK YOU